Quote:
Originally Posted by mdavismccoy Just a note, an example:
Lighting circuit, at the furthest point, last one on the circuit. Join the L & N together, take a resistance reading, R1 and N, half the result, you get R1.
Then join the L and CPC together, take a resistance reading, R1 +R2. One of the readings reqiured. Now subtract R1 from the first test above, you are left with R2.
The same way to get the R2 of a ring. The reistance of R1 and N, in the figure of 8, half the result. Then L and CPC, R1 and R2. |
????????
mate, where the hell did all that come from?
Firstly the R1+R2 for the lights is not neccassrily the last one on the circuit, it is more likely to be the one with the two way switching, which is why we link phase and CPC at the board, measure R1+R2 (switched phase to CPC )at each and record the higest value
thats it R1 +R2 for the lights. Neutrals got nowt to do with it
You could possibly make it more complicated than you have done, but I can think how!!!
In answer to the original question
You are required to confirm the continuity of the protective conductor
you may do this as I have just said, which is convenient because you can ad it to your Ze to get a Zs value and avoid breaking the EAWR's
the R2 method is an alternative (not an additonal) check carried out, as said, by running a long fly-lead out and measuring the resistance of the CPC (R2) at relevant points in the circuit.
You are required to establish (R1+R2) OR R2, not neccassrily both
Mdavis, I got a few spaces left on my next 2391 course, or maybe you would be better starting with the 2392
only joking!
