| Inspection, Testing and Certification of Electrical Installations This Section is STRICTLY for testing PROBLEMS which members have occured, misunderstood readings, Periodic Inspection Reporting, Mathematical Equations/Solutions, Part P and other legislation which require you to Inspect and Test. |
20-06-2008
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
| insulation resistance with a Fluke 1652 Hello, i have just bought a Fluke 1652 and was testing lighting circuits, i bridged out the phase and nautral and tested between the phase and earth with 500 volts, the results that keep coming up is less than 500 M ohms is this right or am i doing something wrong. What would your results normal be.
thanks
baz | | |
| |
20-06-2008
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 190
| Re: insulation resistance with a Fluke 1652 >2000 | | |
| |
20-06-2008
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 369
| Re: insulation resistance with a Fluke 1652 What reading are you getting.
The minimum is 0.5 Megohm
But anything less than 2 Megohm needs further investigation due to possible faults.
So I'd want to be seeing above 2 Megohm (>2)
You'll rarely get 500 Megohm (>500) unless a new installation. | | |
| |
21-06-2008
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Respected Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,048
| Re: insulation resistance with a Fluke 1652 like the lads said, what are you getting?
i always get my students to measure a circuit with about 50Mohms on it, we use meggers, and they get so used to seeing >299Mohms, that the first time they get something else they think the sky has fallen in on them, even tough they are 100 times greater than the minimum reading! | | |
| |
21-06-2008
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
| Re: insulation resistance with a Fluke 1652 im getting >500 megoham, my test voltage is 500 volts, i might be doing the test wrong, i link the phase and nautral in the distribution board and then test between the phase and earth bar in the distribution board, im not getting any other reading >500 megohm. It is a new installation, there all lighting circuits wired is 1.5 pvc in conduits.
thanks
Baz | | |
| |
21-06-2008
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 369
| Re: insulation resistance with a Fluke 1652 On the Fluke you will not get any better than >500 meg.
You are doing it right testing at 500volt (so long as not elv circuit) but if it was a new installation you will need to test between
line - neutral
line - cpc
neutral - cpc
after removing lamps / dimmers / neons / trannys etc
For PIR's it is acceptable to link neutral & line then test to cpc, lazy but acceptable | | |
| |
22-06-2008
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
| Re: insulation resistance with a Fluke 1652 Thanks Easyfox, i just got the fluke and was worried i was doing some thing and i need to fill out some test sheets. | | |
| |
27-06-2008
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Brighton
Posts: 78
| Re: insulation resistance with a Fluke 1652 Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakey like the lads said, what are you getting?
i always get my students to measure a circuit with about 50Mohms on it, we use meggers, and they get so used to seeing >299Mohms, that the first time they get something else they think the sky has fallen in on them, even tough they are 100 times greater than the minimum reading! |
LOL that happened to me at college! all my work is new circuits, so at college when it came up at a reading <200MOhms i didn't have a clue why! i just couldn't get my head around the fact that ANY reading less than infinity would be acceptable! | | |
| |
27-06-2008
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 369
| Re: insulation resistance with a Fluke 1652 Just saw this again & remembered that on Thursday (yesterday) this happened to me.
At 16:00 on my way home I take a call on the mobile from a bathroom fitter asking if I'd mind dropping by to give him a hand, as he was getting funny results (as in a fail 0.33Meg) on a ringmain doing IR test "I'll pay you for your time, cant work it out all I've done is extend the ring to power a shower"
Why did he call me, because I changed the cu a month ago & left one of my contact labels on the cu. I had no problems with any of the circuits when I tested it.
Anyway turned up as it was on my way home, found him upstairs poking 500v round the ring showing me the 0.33meg result " there see, are you sure you tested it because i've checked your cert & you got >200Meg"
So pointed out that in my oppinion it was a neon some where, told him to do a walkround & unplug the trailing lead with neon & retest..................... >200Meg yeeeeha
(it feels sooooooooo good when your right dont it)
His response " well thats the sort of thing that they should teach on the part P course, I didnt know what to do as its the first failed IR reading I've had"
I felt sorry for him he was at the crying stage when he called me, so told him to call if unsure in the future............that I may live to regret but heyho goodwill to all. | |
Last edited by EasyFox; 27-06-2008 at 10:25 PM.
|
| |
29-06-2008
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 19
| Re: insulation resistance with a Fluke 1652 Quote:
Originally Posted by EasyFox cant work it out all I've done is extend the ring to power a shower |    
Surely not! | | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 AM. | |