Currently reading:
another perspective on comparing different brands of panels

Discuss another perspective on comparing different brands of panels in the Solar PV Forum | Solar Panels Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

When I was comparing panels I threw together this spreadsheet to compare different panels drop in output with temperature (just based on manufacturers claims of power coefficient / c). Might be of interest (or for comment if I've got something wrong / misunderstood the specs...)
 

Attachments

  • temperature coefficient.jpg
    23.4 KB · Views: 148
Last edited by a moderator:
qtypanelwattkWpPV SolsizeareatheoreticalPV Sol%
efficiencyefficiency
16Sanyo HIT-H250E01250400040501610*8611.38621180.3182.6101.3%
16Trina TSM-DC05 230230368034071650*9921.6368140.5130.192.6%
16Sharp NU-E245J5245392036291652*9941.642088149.2138.192.6%
16Yingli YL-250Wp250400037221650*9901.6335153.0142.493.1%
16Suntech STP250S-20 Wd Plus250400039531655*9911.640105152.4150.698.8%
16WINAICO WSP-240 Wp M6240384038841650*9991.64835145.6147.3101.1%
16Upsolar UP-M230P230368036051640*9921.62688141.4138.598.0%
16Solarworld 240240384038331675*10011.676675143.1142.999.8%
16znshine ZX250(48)MS250400038401575*10821.70415146.7140.896.0%
16REW 230230368037671575*10821.70415135.0138.2102.4%
16BLD Solar Europe BLD250-60M250400037351650x9921.6368152.7142.693.4%
16Suntech PlutoAde-200200320031411580x8081.27664156.7153.898.2%
16Bisol BMO/245245392037361649x9911.634159149.9142.995.3%
16WINAICO WSP-240 Wp P6240384039221665*9991.663335144.3147.4102.1%

Finally got loan of the PV Sol laptop again so more panels added. Note the Suntech PlutoAde-200 was modelled using an SMA 3000TL.
 
Liquidity,
I'd be really grateful if you could add Hyundai HiS S250MG panels to your list and also out of interest if you could also add the Sharp NU-R250 J5 panels.
I am very interested in the Hyundai due to the lack of availability of the Suntech 250s and the Sharp ones seem to pop up although I suspect them to be less efficient than the Hyundais whilst being more expensive.
Also I don't know the difference between Sharp NU-E*** and Sharp NU-R*** series.
Thanks in advance,
and.
 
I'd be really grateful if you could add Hyundai HiS S250MG panels and also the LG 250M1C panels ... trying to keep this excellent tread going!
 
NOCT data is also published for WINAICO panels.

Picking up on some of the points raised by malibu, there are a number of issues to be considered when choosing panels in addition to spec sheet data. It is important to understand the quality of the product. For example all WINAICO panels are electroluminescently tested before leaving the factory in addition to the standard flash testing. This testing is performed to detect micro cracks.

Mike Doherty
WINACIO
[email protected]
07952 426080

Isn't this a standard test for MCS certified panels amongst many other tests prior to release?
 
Are yes good old marketing, like Kraft Slices, once they'd said "Pint of Milk in every slice" everyone believed them, - that's what all cheese takes, they just said it!
 
Flashing testing is a MCS requirements, but unless I am mistaken electroluminescent testing isn't. Happy for someone with more knowledge to confirm or otherwise.
 
Apologies if I got your back up BiggsSolar, perhaps I was a little brash. However I do stand by my guns.

Worcester - we mainly install REC and they provide NOCT data, so too do Up Solar who we are considering at the moment (BiggSolar please feel free to think what you like about any ulterior motive).

Whilst NOCT gives an additional benchmark to compare modules it is ultimately still only a snapshot at 44 degrees and 800w/m2. What happens when the temperature is -15 and irradiance 500 w/m2 or conversely temperature 60 degrees and 1300 w/m2?

In addition to including the above, PV Sol may also include the manufactures temperature co efficient but this is just a temperature coefficient at 1000w/m2, it doesn’t really mean much in the real world.

The point I was making is that real world module performance is not easy to model on a computer. Especially when the raw module data is not independent – it’s derived from manufacturers data sheets. So why does everyone get hung up on a computer model?

I would have thought a far, far better way to decide which modules are worth installing is to look at outdoor field data, such as Photon International.

Those who rate Sanyo hybrids may find this data from Sheffield University interesting….

Microgeneration Data

Though admittedly a new study, it basically shows per kWp installed there is little or no difference between monos, polys and hybrids.



Clearly there is no better way of testing than putting all the panels in a field adding the same shading, changing their orientation annually, taking in to consideration on those annual figures the fact that the panels have now degraded a bit, also altering their pitch too, perhaps pitch & orientation could be changed on alternate years, then we could move the shading across the panels in an infinite number of different ways, move the whole installation a few miles east to that valley where they're not getting so much morning/evening sun, wiping away a few clouds to allow for the extra light due to the valley being in the rain shadow etc etc etc... We'll also have to check that we're being fair by using flash tested panels that give the exact output, i.e. 0%+/- tolerance.

What PV Sol does do is create a level playing field for all panels to perform on. None of our customers installations are exactly alike and we can see that different situations demand different panels. Our desire is to give our customers an informed choice and without going through the millenia of testing that we'd have to do with the field testing you suggest... it's the best information we have.

That's why we're raving about PV Sol!

- - - Updated - - -

oh I didn't mention that we'd have to do the exact same test with every different inverter on the market.......... I know there's a lot I've missed out but you get the picture.
 
Just guessing - they may get a bit of late afternoon shadow first, as the others drop off very rapidly later, our own systems tend to give a very smooth tail off in the evening - any chance of a photo of the array?
 
Great - really interesting thread here and very useful table thanks..( i like your detailed guide also to each column :)

if you did want other real-time information or a perspective from other installation owners you could also check out a free pv monitoring site such as PV-Log. This is a social monitoring site..no hardware costs and free to use, make solar friends, showcase your installations etc.

I'm new here so also hi to everyone!
 

Reply to another perspective on comparing different brands of panels in the Solar PV Forum | Solar Panels Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top