Discuss Consumer Unit Changes, options for Customers in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
As do I, but I haven't met the customer on this one, and a little flyer would be niceNope I just explain it to them. If they don't understand after a couple of tries then they are not the sort of people to care which option they get anyway.
You could adapt this info to make a flyer
RCBO vs RCD consumer unit replacement - http://www.smallinstalls.co.uk/blog/item/57-rcbo-vs-rcd-consumer-unit-replacement
Separate rcbos comply with division of circuits, dual rcd boards do not and should be recorded as a deviation from BS7671.
This is a grey area which manufacturers have capitilised upon. We are talking of Reg 314, whether we use separate rcbos or dual rcd boards part (i) of this Reg can never be guaranteed no matter how circuits are arranged in a dual rcd board. What can be assured is that separate rcbos lesson any danger or inconvenience. So to me any alternative is a deviation as you are using a method which is not the best solution, just more cost effective for the customer.I'd have to disagree with that, it all depends on how the circuits are arranged with a dual RCD board and it's certainly not a non compliance IMO.
The Regulation does not require any inconvenience to be eradicated though!What can be assured is that separate rcbos lesson any danger or inconvenience.
It states circuits shall be divided to avoid danger and minimise inconvenience, separate rcbos achieve this better than dual rcd boards.
A socket radial circuit to each room in the house would achieve better division of circuits and minimisation of inconvenience than a ring final circuit serving multiple rooms. Should a RFC be put down as a deviation ?
No not trying to get more money from anyone, use dual rcd boards myself. Was just trying to say the other method provides correct division of circuits. And yes I list this as a Deviation.I don't know about most of you but my 16th board rcd hasn't tripped in over a year. What's this "minimise inconvenience"? It may sounds like you are trying to get more money off the customer.
Yes RCD's are better but when they come down to the same price as a breaker then things may get better.
Was just trying to say the other method provides correct division of circuits.
I don't know about most of you but my 16th board rcd hasn't tripped in over a year. What's this "minimise inconvenience"? It may sounds like you are trying to get more money off the customer.
Yes RCD's are better but when they come down to the same price as a breaker then things may get better.
Well yes it does but not as effectively as separate rcbos.and a dual rcd board doesn't?
Well yes it does but not as effectively as separate rcbos.
The reason I use dual rcd boards is because of cost. I only use separate rcbos if there are limited circuits. Dual rcd boards are not practical where say you may only have 4 or 5 circuits or space is restricted. I chose the best method for the situation and as you can see from my picture that is the only way I scare customersObviously..... But a dual rcd board is cheaper and to the regs.
I do hope you are not trying to scare customers into buying
Reply to Consumer Unit Changes, options for Customers in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.