Posting a message to the forum will remove the above advertisement

Discuss R1 + R2 of ring circuit in the Electrical Forum area at ElectrciansForums.co.uk.

Please make sure you checkout our forum sponsors, many do discounts for members and, they keep the forum free to use.
  1. haptism
    Offline

    haptism Regular EF Member

    Location:
    SW. London
    Hi for a ring circuit, is there any need to measure and enter R1 + R2 values on a schedule of results ? Because an r2 value is already measured (together with r1 and rn). If I needed a ring R1 + R2 value to calculate ZS (although i would find ZS with a socket tester so really no need; but if I did) would i find it using the formula ZS = (r1 + r2)/4 ? Thanks all
     
  2. Hellmooth
    Offline

    Hellmooth Electrician's Arms

    Location:
    Livingston
    Business Name:
    CM Electrical
    Verification that it is a ring circuit would be a good reason.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  3. jackhammerJIM
    Offline

    jackhammerJIM Regular EF Member

    Location:
    north yorks
    That would be r1 rn r2 . not R1 + R2

    R1 + R2 IS required to confirm polarity
     
  4. Wilko
    Offline

    Wilko Gorillas are Great Electrician's Arms

    Location:
    Berkshire
    Business Name:
    Wilko Electrics
    Yep, values from testing are needed for your test schedule for both r and R. GN3 has method laid out in section 2.2.6.
     
  5. haptism
    Offline

    haptism Regular EF Member

    Location:
    SW. London
    I dont have GN3 yet unfortunately. On the test schedule (IEE model form) there is a column for r1, r2, and rn values, so its obviously a ring im testing. The next column along asks for either R1 + R2, or R2; R2 is long lead method which would give exactly the same value as r2. So with that in mind whats the point of recording an R1 + R2, or R2 value if you have already measured r2 ?? Which my question is, do I need to enter an R1 + R2 value if i already have r2 ?? If you get what I mean that would be great ;)
     
  6. jackhammerJIM
    Offline

    jackhammerJIM Regular EF Member

    Location:
    north yorks
    yes you need R1 +R2 to confirm polarity
     
  7. telectrix
    Offline

    telectrix Scouser and Proud of It Trusted Advisor

    Location:
    cheshire/staffordshire
    Business Name:
    Telectrix
    R2 reading wound not be same as r2.
     
    • Like Like x 6
  8. Wilko
    Offline

    Wilko Gorillas are Great Electrician's Arms

    Location:
    Berkshire
    Business Name:
    Wilko Electrics
    Def recommend GN3 ... I do tests and enter values for r1, rn, r2 and (R1+R2). Then I compare (r1+r2) to (R1+R2), looking for the magic 4 factor if I've built it right :)
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2017
  9. kropaske
    Offline

    kropaske Active EF Member

    Location:
    Feltham
    With r1 r2 rn you confirm that it is RFC by doing R1+R2 you verifying that cpc is actually connected to the socket and as jackhammer said verifying polarity
     
  10. sparksburnout
    Offline

    sparksburnout Electrician's Arms

    Location:
    Notts
    Or an I&T course? Like a sparks....
     
    • Like Like x 2
  11. Risteard
    Offline

    Risteard Electrician's Arms

    Location:
    Derry, Ireland
    Business Name:
    Walsh Electrical Services
    It certainly shouldn't if done correctly! In fact it should be a quarter of the r2 value if there are no spurs. But given that the test for the (R1+R2) value is required as part of the ring final circuit continuity tests I see no merit in opting for R2 over (R1+R2) presuming that we are discussing initial verification here.
     
  12. haptism
    Offline

    haptism Regular EF Member

    Location:
    SW. London
    Okay, so in step 3 of the ring final test, when you cross connect L + E, the highest result is your R1 +R2. Having a brain drain today, quickly why would R2 differ from r2 ?
     
  13. kropaske
    Offline

    kropaske Active EF Member

    Location:
    Feltham
    correct

    r2 is end to end
    R2 is when joined together
     
  14. haptism
    Offline

    haptism Regular EF Member

    Location:
    SW. London
    Thanks all, and thanks for your patience and goodwill,
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. Risteard
    Offline

    Risteard Electrician's Arms

    Location:
    Derry, Ireland
    Business Name:
    Walsh Electrical Services
    Because with it all connected in parallel it will be double the cross-sectional area and half of the length.
     
    • Like Like x 1
Loading...
Similar Threads - ring circuit Forum Date
Large Volt Drop in ring circuit Electrical Forum Jul 14, 2017
EICR code Split cpc on ring final circuit Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations Jun 29, 2017
Faulty MCB. Problem isolating ring final circuit at CU with MCB Electrical Forum Jun 28, 2017
Scrap the Ring final circuit Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations Jun 18, 2017
13a Fuse Spare spur from ring circuit Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations Jun 7, 2017
Low IR ring final circuit Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations Jun 5, 2017

Share This Page

  • Electricians Directory Post a Domestic Job Post a Commercial Job