Discuss MCB, RCD & AFDD all in one in the Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Welcome to ElectriciansForums.net - The American Electrical Advice Forum
Head straight to the main forums to chat by click here:   American Electrical Advice Forum

Whilst AFD's don't detect series arc faults on a ring final cct that mode of fault is not as dangerous on a ring because of the parallel path available for the load current so it's kinda swings and roundabouts....
 
Things can be in the regs even without a tester - after all there's never been a tester for the magnetic or thermal parts of an MCB/RCBO, only for the residual current part. Dame goes for fuses for that matter. so we have no idea if they still work when doing inspection and testing.
 
Things can be in the regs even without a tester - after all there's never been a tester for the magnetic or thermal parts of an MCB/RCBO, only for the residual current part. Dame goes for fuses for that matter. so we have no idea if they still work when doing inspection and testing.

But if a fuse blows or an MCB trips you have test equipment to diagnose the fault quickly and reliably every time.

No such thing with these devices, one might keep tripping due to a natural arc in a circuit (something switching). How do you fault find that.... just start replacing parts at an unnecessary cost.
 
'premises with sleeping accommodation' is a bit ambiguous, though. I'm assuming they mean hotels?

It is very ambiguous. The Oxford Dictionary says 'Accommodation' is "A room, group of rooms, or building in which someone may live or stay. ‘they were living in temporary accommodation’ "

Doesn't that put every house down as having "sleeping accommodation" ?
 
But if a fuse blows or an MCB trips you have test equipment to diagnose the fault quickly and reliably every time.
Yes, you can just look at the switch or at the melted fuse. But the same applies to the afdd. I thought people meant testing the device itself for correct operation, which you can only do with rcds.

With rcds you can test the rcd itself, and you can ir test the circuit.

With fuses and mcbs you can only test the circuit.
With afdds not sure! Maybe neither?
 
It is very ambiguous. The Oxford Dictionary says 'Accommodation' is "A room, group of rooms, or building in which someone may live or stay. ‘they were living in temporary accommodation’ "

Doesn't that put every house down as having "sleeping accommodation" ?
Yep.
Fortunately 421.1.7 has two softeners for now. It says "If used..." and then gives "Examples of where such devices can be used...". This will change to "shall be used" at some point I guess.
 
Yep.
Fortunately 421.1.7 has two softeners for now. It says "If used..." and then gives "Examples of where such devices can be used...". This will change to "shall be used" at some point I guess.

But, pinching this from the earlier post, it also has:
421.1.7 arc fault detection devices conforming to BS EN 62606 are recommended as a means of providing additional protection against fire caused by arc faults in AC final circuits.

If there is a fire and it goes to court and the court says "BS6761 recommend that you use Arc Fault Detection Devices. Why didn't you fit them?" Where would you stand from a legal point of view?
 
If there is a fire and it goes to court and the court says "BS7671 recommend that you use Arc Fault Detection Devices. Why didn't you fit them?" Where would you stand from a legal point of view?

I think if you could demonstrate you'd suggested it to the customer and that they'd nearly choked on their tea when told the price, you'd be fairly safe as you would have done your part.

Sure it could be argued that by continuing without insisting you've been negligent but at the end of the day it is only a recommendation at the moment and you recommended it... the customer chose not to take up the recommendation.

But it is yet another thing that Dangerous Dave won't give a t055 about meaning he'll be even cheaper than the rest of us. It's like the earth rod for TN earthing systems... if that becomes mandatory (I haven't got the big sky blue book yet) and is required to be applied retrospectively to existing installations (ala earthing and bonding up to snuff), customers will think you're just trying to fleece them.

This is part of the problem with the regs... they don't make it publicly known what homes should have and what people should expect, so the cowboys can get away without providing it. If they made more of an effort to educate householders it may help.
 
Yes you are right @Spoon - it is recommended to have AFDD !
Normally (ha, what would I know) if the Customer won't agree to buy a product and it's not mandatory to have it, then I think we are ok. But we'd have to have that discussion and sign off (!!!).
Edit - what @SparkyChick said :)
 
I think if you could demonstrate you'd suggested it to the customer and that they'd nearly choked on their tea when told the price, you'd be fairly safe as you would have done your part.

Good point @SparkyChick .
So you would have to do two quotes. One with AFDD's, explaining what they are and why you recommend them and a quote without. Then the responsibility is shifted to the customer.
 
Good point @SparkyChick .
So you would have to do two quotes. One with AFDD's, explaining what they are and why you recommend them and a quote without. Then the responsibility is shifted to the customer.

I would do it as an option with a recommendation that the change can increase the safety of the installation.
 
Having designed our four storey timber framed barn conversion to the 18th ed., including 18 AFDD circuits, 11 1P+N RCBO circuits & SPDs, today I received an email from Eaton's Regional Account Manager, stating;
"At the current time we do not have a distribution board solution for the AFDD. That means the AFDD would have to be mounted in a separate enclosure to a distribution board on a din rail with MCBs in the Distribution board feeding the AFDD units.
Let me know if this is a solution you would like me to look at."


So, despite all the marketing, the Eaton video, the reality is the only way to implement is a botch! So much for an "all in one device". I have replied this evening, asking how the product has ever been released, if it is not a type tested coordinated assembly, i.e. tested within an Eaton/MEM board.
 

Reply to MCB, RCD & AFDD all in one in the Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock