Discuss Circuit design - SWA R1+R2 in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

P

pencilpusher

Hi all

This has got me thinking. I am designing a circuit using 3 core 2.5mm SWA and using table 11 in the OSG on page 182.

With an R1 of 2.5mm and the same for R2 I know what the milli ohms per metre is. That's all well and good but I also know from experience that when uisng the armour as an additional CPC (so to speak) that the R2 resistance will be much lower due to the additional conductor csa in circuit. However, in order to design my circuit more accurately, how do I work out the actual R1+R2 for the SWA used?

Cheers for any help on this.

PP
 
there's a table on a thread giving equivalent copper size to steel armour. e.g. for 6mm SWA 3 core the armour is 34mm eq. to 15 Cu. think it's a sticky.
 
Once you have the copper equivalent csa then you can use the formula
R= rho * l / A
where rho is the resistivity of the material. For copper it is 1.7 * 10^-8. (It varies for different types of steel being about 50*10^-8 so use the copper value) then you can work out the resistance of the armour and therefore the total R2.
R is in ohms, l is in metres, A is in m².

remember that if you are running a separate cpc and using the armour the regs recommend using a separate CPC of sufficient csa to carry the entire fault current because the split between the two conductors may not be accurately known.
 
Thank you Richard. To clarify though, my CPC is within the 3 core and is the same size as the line conductor so I presume that complies anyway re fault currents?
 
This simple method only works up to a point, I think once you get on to the larger cable sizes impedance plays a part and changes the calcs.

I was talking about the copper equivalent csa of the steel.

IIRC Steel has 8x the resistance of equivalent copper, or IOW needs to have 8X the csa of an equivalent Copper conductor , but I will stand to be corrected on this point.
 

Reply to Circuit design - SWA R1+R2 in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Firstly, please go easy as I'm still a trainee! Working on my L3 2365 I'm having trouble understanding the rationale behind adiabatics...
Replies
3
Views
752
Please advise what I should test / check next. My usual qualified electrician who did all of the work here is in Ireland for 4 weeks and not...
Replies
45
Views
3K
Evening everyone, I was taught when carrying out Zs testing to test both L-PE and L-N and record the highest result of the two tests for my Zs...
Replies
11
Views
2K
Hi there, I'm Currently doing my design calcs for my college project and doing the actual Zs calculation. Formula is Zs= Ze (or Zdb) + (R1+R2)...
Replies
1
Views
1K
Hi, and thank you to anyone who's taking the time to read my question. i'm struggling with the outcome of an adiabatic equation i'm doing and...
Replies
4
Views
3K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock