T
Discuss Conversion of 3 ph. to single phase lesson in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
To be honest I am sufficiently flabbergasted at the moment I really do not know. However...the plan is to remove all of it and start over and rewire the whole property so it will be gone before too long. I don't quite know what to say about it. What is your view?So what did you do when you come across this
I like the curl in the tail. Is that for heat dissipation?
Well I certainly can't think of any regs to say that is not kosher although it would need thinking through if it were to stay, but it is going so no big deal. An EICR put a load of C2 for lack of RCD protection so it is an old Memshield2 type B DB so I put five Eaton MR30 RCD modules as a temporary answer to no RCD however they are around £110 each, ouch! for the Landlord anyway.Don't see the problem
It doubles as a WiFi amplifier.I like the curl in the tail. Is that for heat dissipation?
Agree - this has never been ok in my humble opinion. Regs that come to mind are 134.1.1 (good workmanship by skilled persons using proper materials), 522.8.4 (adequate cable support for own weight) and 522.8.5 (adequate cable support so no mechanical strain on terminations). This last one 522.8.5 has a note added in the 18th to spell out that CU tails are included here, probably what sparked (!) the discussion .I overheard the inspector remark that there is a tightening up on the requirement to adequately secure cables such as meter tails, especially ones which can 'flap in the breeze' as vortigen's image shows... I don't know the regulation number.
Reply to Conversion of 3 ph. to single phase lesson in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.