Des 56, are the individual instruments really better than multifunction testers? If they gave different readings, the MFs wouldn't get their calibration certs would they?
Please dont read too seriously into that post, the occasionall light hearted and stupid comments tend to be a weakness of mine
To answer your post
"Better" ? Of course individual instruments are better
At least in my opinion they are
Different readings,now come on sir,I haven't stated that,----yet
Each to their own I suppose,my reasons are
If for instance the meter devleoped a problem,I dont lose the functions of the other meters,whereas if a multifunction tester develops a problem, you have lost the lot
Setting the instruments up for the various functions is a pain in the backside,beep,beep,change,beep beep,change
When I am testing away from the dist board,there is not that cumbersome contraption to haul around, beep beep
There are downsides to seperate instruments and I will think of one in a moment
OK after musing for a few minutes,I have managed to conclude that, yes,they cost a little extra for callibration and,and,and sorry, thats it