Discuss EICR - high readings in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

D

dan7202

I am part way through a condition report for a customer.
The house is generally in good condition but the electrical installation is quite old.
Although the rings are properly installed as ring final circuits, the 2.5 mm t and e cable is stranded and the Cpc appears to be 1 mm rather than 1.5 mm.
I expect the r2 readings to be proportionately higher because of this but they are between 10% and 40% higher than I would have expected.
When checking behind sockets all the connections seem solid but the cables do look a bit worn (sheathing looks tired )and have possibly been subject to damp.
The r1/r2 crossover readings are also higher than expected. And I have based the expected readings for these on the measured R1 and R2 readings.
The installation seems all over the place and generally tired, there are other issues such as broken neutral and faulty shower connections which I have found. Most of the circuits have low IR readings as well which suggest to me that there is a general degradation of the cables.
Am I missing anything in terms of other possible causes.?

Any suggestions welcome.
 
your r2 readings should be 2.5 x r1 (and rN) for a 2.5/1.0mm circuit.
 
How many strands are in the live conductors and the CPC? Are the strands of the CPC the same gauge as the lives? Are they tinned?

Stranded T+E (less than 4mm²) used for ring mains is usually imperial 7/.029, not 2.5mm². The lives would be 2.93mm² and if the CPC is 3/.036 as prescribed by the 14th ed this would be 1.93mm², the ratio being 1.5:1.

However there were other sizes of CPC used in 7/.029 and it could be 3/.029 or even 1/.044, which at 0.98mm² makes the ratio nearly 3:1. If the loop impedance and adiabatics are OK then the (relatively) high reading might be acceptable.

If you are not familiar with distinguishing between imperial and metric sizes, the best way to be certain of the CSA is to measure a strand with a micrometer. As far as degradation goes, low IR is rarely the result of undamaged cables simply aging, but do look out for green goo that would indicate breakdown.
 
How many strands are in the live conductors and the CPC? Are the strands of the CPC the same gauge as the lives? Are they tinned?

Stranded T+E (less than 4mm²) used for ring mains is usually imperial 7/.029, not 2.5mm². The lives would be 2.93mm² and if the CPC is 3/.036 as prescribed by the 14th ed this would be 1.93mm², the ratio being 1.5:1.

However there were other sizes of CPC used in 7/.029 and it could be 3/.029 or even 1/.044, which at 0.98mm² makes the ratio nearly 3:1. If the loop impedance and adiabatics are OK then the (relatively) high reading might be acceptable.

If you are not familiar with distinguishing between imperial and metric sizes, the best way to be certain of the CSA is to measure a strand with a micrometer. As far as degradation goes, low IR is rarely the result of undamaged cables simply aging, but do look out for green goo that would indicate breakdown.
quite right lucien...

depends on how much fault it has been subjected to....as well as the usual (temprature, installation method, etc)..

when replacing old boards its worth while looking at how much splash is in the fuse carrier.......this can give an indication of whether the install has had a hard life...
 
Thanks for the replies
Yes the crossovers were correct and I do know how to recognise if they aren't.
r2 values are generally double the r1 values with the exception of one circuit where it was 2.5 times the r1 value.

IR readings are all around the 500 Mohm value.
 
And, there are no signs at the sockets of spurs or rings within rings but there are limitations with the inspection regarding the building fabric and floorboards as the person commissioning the inspection is a prospective buyer and not the owner.
 
How many strands are in the live conductors and the CPC? Are the strands of the CPC the same gauge as the lives? Are they tinned?

Stranded T+E (less than 4mm²) used for ring mains is usually imperial 7/.029, not 2.5mm². The lives would be 2.93mm² and if the CPC is 3/.036 as prescribed by the 14th ed this would be 1.93mm², the ratio being 1.5:1.

However there were other sizes of CPC used in 7/.029 and it could be 3/.029 or even 1/.044, which at 0.98mm² makes the ratio nearly 3:1. If the loop impedance and adiabatics are OK then the (relatively) high reading might be acceptable.

If you are not familiar with distinguishing between imperial and metric sizes, the best way to be certain of the CSA is to measure a strand with a micrometer. As far as degradation goes, low IR is rarely the result of undamaged cables simply aging, but do look out for green goo that would indicate breakdown.

I always find it amusing that you can show a customer very low IR readings and yet they won't believe that there's anything wrong, yet show them the green goo (even if figures are good) and they want a rewire there and then!
 
Thanks for the replies
The ir values are all around the 500 mark
Resistance for the r2 are about double the r1
I have definitely done the crossovers correctly and know the signs if I haven't .
There are no signs of spurs off spurs at the sockets but I am limited with the building fabric and floorboards as the inspection is for a potential buyer and not the current owner
 
IR readings are all around the 500 Mohm value

Are these the ones you're describing as low?

10 yards of new cable terminated in a new fitting on a dry day should top that easily, but if the weather round your way is anything like it is here, 500MΩ is pretty good for an old circuit that will have a fine film of dust and dirt over all the insulation in the accessories, holding the moisture and encouraging leakage. I'd be happy with that on a new install.

With reference to the resistance of the CPC vs the lives, you'll have to get your mike out and measure. You didn't answer my question about the number of strands but it sounds like you might have a mix of cables, perhaps mostly 7/.029 with a bit of 2.5 thrown in.

FWIW I do like 7/.029 rings, it has that extra bit of capacity and yet it's more flexible than 2.5. Would never have looked right in blue and brown though.
 
Last edited:
Don't you mean R1 and R2 as opposed to r1 and r2 they are different you know

- - - Updated - - -

Don't you mean R1 and R2 as opposed to r1 and r2 they are different you know
 
And I'm not helping with my R1 reference either, I'll change that to avoid confusion
 

Reply to EICR - high readings in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi, I did my first EICR on a TT system today and the Zs was a lot higher than Ze+R1+R2 on everything. Zs was around 3.5 ohms on all of the ring...
Replies
10
Views
970
OLDBOY
O
Please advise what I should test / check next. My usual qualified electrician who did all of the work here is in Ireland for 4 weeks and not...
Replies
45
Views
3K
Another thread asked about two circuits sharing a common multi-core cable and regulation 521.8.1 was mentioned. A friend of mine has inherited...
Replies
13
Views
617
I have been asked to look at this report as the customer has been given (in their words) 'A very high quote plus VAT'. It doesn't look well...
Replies
5
Views
581
Hi All New to this forum, have read the posts on here from google but only recently signed up. I'm having some issues and some input would be...
Replies
13
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock