B
Bait Account
Not really but then again it's none of your beeswax.
Discuss Fire rated clips - any suggestions? in the Security Alarms, Door Entry and CCTV (Public) area at ElectriciansForums.net
Troll alert. Flick do you have anything useful to say?
Not really but then again it's none of your beeswax.
That's rich from someone that's used it 84 times if it makes me dumb it must make you dumber.I doubt it.
Using the dumb button 8 times is dumb ... but the mods think it’s a good idea to keep it - I think it causes more problems
I doubt it.
Using the dumb button 8 times is dumb ... but the mods think it’s a good idea to keep it - I think it causes more problems
I wasn't going to say anything but I'm sorry didn't you use the very same rating earlier today, and after you said we shouldn't have it.
But it can't work like that can it , surely you must be able to see that.Of course I used it .... on the person who used it 8 times in 1 thread , so very justified imho
But it can't work like that can it , surely you must be able to see that.
You cannot complain constantly about the dumb rating and ask for it to be removed because in your words it causes problems and then go and use the very same rating on someone else, it doesn't matter that someone used it on you , if you truly believe it's wrong then you can't use it yourself when it suits.
Surely I'm not the only one that thinks this.
WTF are you on about now. According to what I’ve looked at the member “flex” that you are mentioning hasn’t used dumb ever. As @GMES has already said if you are that against it you wouldn’t use it but hey ho we’ve been there before but you just can’t let it rest. Seems like you’re more of the troll than flex is.On the contrary.... I used it deliberately to prove my point.
@flex is nothing but a forum troll ..... but you staff guys think that his use of dumb is ok .
13 likes given
10 dumbs given
Since 2014
Says it all really
Sure I’ve used it more, but in the past principally aimed at @essex when he was baiting people
Hi - from a practical viewpoint it is common practice to use rods to gain access for cables in otherwise inaccessible places. The cable is then attached to the rod and pulled through the void, with no further fixing within this otherwise inaccessible void. Domestically this is a common method to extend a lighting circuit for example and invariably that part of the cable run would be resting on the ceiling plasterboard and any insulation present.We will leave it here but plasterboard is NOT a means of supporting cables.
Seems like you are wrong again on both counts. There is actually a member flex flex - https://www.electriciansforums.co.uk/members/flex.55454/ and member Flick has nothing to do with the mods our account for testing and training is @Testaccount and has been for some time. All this bickering between you and the staff is actually only derailing threads.
Hi - just going back to cable fixing for a tick -
Hi - from a practical viewpoint it is common practice to use rods to gain access for cables in otherwise inaccessible places. The cable is then attached to the rod and pulled through the void, with no further fixing within this otherwise inaccessible void. Domestically this is a common method to extend a lighting circuit for example and invariably that part of the cable run would be resting on the ceiling plasterboard and any insulation present.
If I've understood correctly, you believe this is not an acceptable installation practice and it exposes people to danger and the installer would liable to criminal prosecution in the event of future injuries?
Reply to Fire rated clips - any suggestions? in the Security Alarms, Door Entry and CCTV (Public) area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.