Discuss RCD splitting question in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Welcome to ElectriciansForums.net - The American Electrical Advice Forum
Head straight to the main forums to chat by click here:   American Electrical Advice Forum

P

piggyitm

Hey guys!!
Can anyone tell me if I'm wrong.
I've run a 16mm Twin from mains to a 2 storey extension where I'm putting in a new board.2 rings 2 lights and smokes
I have to put in an RCD at the mains end so I was gonna put the new board on a 100a Main SW.
Is that Ok or do I have to still put in a Dual RCD split load to cover me for division of circuits?
Cheers
 
Wrong in many ways!! Why 16mm and why twin and earth?? Have you done your calcs taking max demand and length of conductors into account, more so, you cannot supply this kind of load from a existing rcd as when combined with other circuits the rcd will overloaded and in the event of a fault the rcd would trip at the origin causing neuceince tripping at the house and leaving the occupants of the house with issues trying to get it reset.

This needs the attentions of someone with a higher degree of competence

The way to do it is split the meter tails into henly blocks into a switch fuse, swa to the flat from there, suitably sized as per calcs. This then negates the need for RCD at origin. Terminated into a split load twin RCD. Board in the flat.
 
Wrong in many ways!! Why 16mm and why twin and earth?? You cant dismiss this out of hand,it may well be adequate....more info on the loading,earthing system,and installation method is required Have you done your calcs taking max demand and length of conductors into account, more so, you cannot supply this kind of load from a existing rcd as when combined with other circuits the rcd will overloaded How do you know that?and in the event of a fault the rcd would trip at the origin causing neuceince tripping at the house and leaving the occupants of the house with issues trying to get it reset.

This needs the attentions of someone with a higher degree of competence

The way to do it is split the meter tails into henly blocks into a switch fuse, swa to the flat from there, suitably sized as per calcs. This then negates the need for RCD at origin. Terminated into a split load twin RCD. Board in the flat.

I agree that an RCD at the origin is not best practice,but more info is needed on the type of earthing system...is the reason for an RCd at the origin because the earthing is TT?....or are you thinking the T/E distribution circuit will be buried and need RCD protection?
Also the OP states the distribution circuit will be on a 100a main switch....will there be any overload/fault protection for the proposed 16mm?.....A lot more info is needed here to give an answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree that an RCD at the origin is not best practice,but more info is needed on the type of earthing system...is the reason for an RCd at the origin because the earthing is TT?....or are you thinking the T/E distribution circuit will be buried and need RCD protection?
Also the OP states the distribution circuit will be on a 100a main switch....will there be any overload/fault protection for the proposed 16mm?.....A lot more info is needed here to give an answer.

To be fair even on a TT, a split load twin RCD should satisfy the regs and would render any at origin pointless, and I get the impression he was suppling it from another 30mA on a exsisting board, hence switchfuse and henleys.

I know I should have asked for more info, to be fair I normally do! But on this occasion I was trying to avoid the normal 20 post back and forth trying to clear up the basics.
 
Hey guys!!
Can anyone tell me if I'm wrong.
I've run a 16mm Twin from mains to a 2 storey extension where I'm putting in a new board.2 rings 2 lights and smokes
I have to put in an RCD at the mains end so I was gonna put the new board on a 100a Main SW.
Is that Ok or do I have to still put in a Dual RCD split load to cover me for division of circuits?
Cheers


If this is an ''extension'' to an existing property, Why are you installing a separate CU remote from the existing CU?? If you don't have enough ways in the existing CU you could either add another below /above
existing, or change the existing CU for a CU with enough ways to cover this new extension to the property.

Having 2 remotely separated CUs in a single dwelling property is a nonsense....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If this is an ''extension'' to an existing property, Why are you installing a separate CU remote from the existing CU?? If you don't have enough ways in the existing CU you could either add another below /above
existing, or change the existing CU for a CU with enough ways to cover this new extension to the property.

Having 2 remotely separated CUs in a single dwelling property is a nonsense....

Why??.....running a single distribution circuit to a separate local DB may be a whole lot easier than running back a shed load of final circuits to the origin.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To be fair even on a TT, a split load twin RCD should satisfy the regs and would render any at origin pointless, and I get the impression he was suppling it from another 30mA on a exsisting board, hence switchfuse and henleys.

I know I should have asked for more info, to be fair I normally do! But on this occasion I was trying to avoid the normal 20 post back and forth trying to clear up the basics.

Well no mate....if it's a TT an RCD with be necessary at the origin to provide fault protection to the distribution circuit...ideally a 100ma time delayed with a split rcd board in the extension.....if it's a TT and thats how the OP is going to do it:)
 
''Why??.....running a single distribution circuit to a separate local DB may be a whole lot easier than running back a shed load of final circuits to the origin. ''


Put it this way then, ....If it was my house and you suggested running in another CU, for what is, when all said and done just an extension of my house you'd be gone!!! Two remotely separated CUs in a single dwelling is not my idea of a correct electrical installation. ....It's just an easy option!!!
 
''Why??.....running a single distribution circuit to a separate local DB may be a whole lot easier than running back a shed load of final circuits to the origin. ''


Put it this way then, ....If it was my house and you suggested running in another CU, for what is, when all said and done just an extension of my house you'd be gone!!! Two remotely separated CUs in a single dwelling is not my idea of a correct electrical installation. ....It's just an easy option!!!

It depends on the size of the house obviously....but the above statement as a generalisation is misleading and incorrect....for example the two storey extension may be a separate annexe...granny flat?....in which case a separate DB would make sense. If the house was a large one running final circuits back to the origin may result in excessive final circuit legnths....a second DB would solve those issues.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok.The existing board is 15th Edition and obsolete on a TNS.The idea was to henley into the tails with some kind of RCD config to protect the cable and deal with 17th regs about 50mm depth.Is this wrong Also?The question was do i still need to divide my circuits accross 2 rcds in my new board even if it's got an rcd at the main?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok.The existing board is 15th Edition and obsolete on a TNS.The idea was to henley into the tails with some kind of RCD config to protect the cable and deal with 17th regs about 50mm depth.Is this wrong Also?The question was do i still need to divide my circuits accross 2 rcds in my new board even if it's got an rcd at the main?

Well that's a bit daft isn't it, having an 30mA RCD protecting 2 further 30mA RCDs or RCBOs!!!

So what's the plan then, leave what your calling an obsolete CU for the existing installation, and provide a spanking new CU for the extension?? So the different parts of the house will be wired to differing wiring Regs also??

Sorry, i just can't get my head around having 2 completly seperate CUs in a SINGLE dwelling house.
 
Ok.The existing board is 15th Edition and obsolete on a TNS.The idea was to henley into the tails with some kind of RCD config to protect the cable and deal with 17th regs about 50mm depth.Is this wrong Also?The question was do i still need to divide my circuits accross 2 rcds in my new board even if it's got an rcd at the main?

Don't put 2 ordinary rcds on the same circuit - No discrimination.
 
Is the extension functioning as part of the main house? If it is i would be more tempted to go along the lines of extending the lighting circuits and sorting out the old CU. With extra circuits for the new sockets and smokes. Just my 2 pennyworth :)
 
Im with pushrod here if you add further cu's then they would have to be connected to the original cu or if your lucky enought to have a main switch installed as you have to provide a single point of isolation , i have installed 2 cu's in a small bungalow , but this was due to the existing cu being above a ceiling height so i installed a small main board with a 3 pole isolator then subed out the main circuits to one board and eco 7 to another , and protected by 2 63 amp mcbs , customer was chuffed as she didnt have to climb on the work tops to reset a tripped mcb
 
It depends on the size of the house obviously....but the above statement as a generalisation is misleading and incorrect....for example the two storey extension may be a separate annexe...granny flat?....in which case a separate DB would make sense. If the house was a large one running final circuits back to the origin may result in excessive final circuit legnths....a second DB would solve those issues.

First off .... It wouldn't then be a ''Single Dwelling'' house if the extension was to be an annexe or separate flat, would it?? Then you would be correct...

If this was a large house to start with, it would be very doubtful the owner would be adding a two storey extension, ....not impossible, but doubtful!! I would suggest that the now present size of house is in all probability a 4 bed-roomed house converted from a 2 or maybe even a 3 bed-roomed house. ....So how many 4 bed-roomed houses have you seen with 2 completly separate CUs supplying it's electrical needs???

I stand firmly behind my statement, ...it's certainly not misleading and it's not incorrect either. If we were talking about a very substantial 3 or 4 storey house, or of the like you could possibly have a valid point.
 
The more I read, the more i find out the more I think with 15th edition equipment then possibly the whole house could do with attention to bring it up to the same standard as the new addition and incorporate it into one installation
 
So i have to install a new board to create a new way rather than tap off the tails and put in an extra 17th CU that can feed the extension board because there is no supplied main isolator and because the house is only 4 bedrooms?Isn't this just like tapping off a busbar chamber with a new board and labeling it DB2 then making the extension DB2/1 at both ends?
 
So i have to install a new board to create a new way rather than tap off the tails and put in an extra 17th CU that can feed the extension board because there is no supplied main isolator and because the house is only 4 bedrooms?Isn't this just like tapping off a busbar chamber with a new board and labeling it DB2 then making the extension DB2/1 at both ends?


:confused: Just replace present CU with a larger one. Arrange for supplier to fit an isolator.
 
Hey Hightower while your on...same extension....do i have to install mains interlink smokes in the existing house to connect in with my extension smoke install?
And do i need to change 25% of the lights in the existing to conform with L1A?Also there are some existing spots that aren't fire rated in the kitchen will these have to have hoods AND all the sockets are below 450mm
 
As far as I know fire hoods and socket Heights arnt retrospective, so no for them but you will have to update smokes mate, and as for lighting do a quick search on here as there was a thread debating the lighting issue, not sure what the outcome was
 

Reply to RCD splitting question in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock