Discuss When is supplementary bonding not required ? Tails not on rcd... in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

tomodo

-
Reaction score
7
Hi all, im installing a new consumer unit in a bungalow , customer wanted it moving from bathroom to hallway. The system is a tns system and the meter tails are around 7 meters long, now because of this i have installed a 80 amp switch fuse inside the meter box and the tails run from this up the cavity ( around a meter or so ) and over the top of the loft joists. Because this circuit is not on an rcd am i now required to install supplementary bonding? The cavity the tails run up is one of the bathroom walls but tails do not run over the top of bathroom. Thought about putting a 100ma time delayed rcd in aswell but dont think this would count as additional protection as its not 30ma and would struggle to fit in meter box .

Thanks
 
Hi all, im installing a new consumer unit in a bungalow , customer wanted it moving from bathroom to hallway. The system is a tns system and the meter tails are around 7 meters long, now because of this i have installed a 80 amp switch fuse inside the meter box and the tails run from this up the cavity ( around a meter or so ) and over the top of the loft joists. Because this circuit is not on an rcd am i now required to install supplementary bonding? The cavity the tails run up is one of the bathroom walls but tails do not run over the top of bathroom. Thought about putting a 100ma time delayed rcd in aswell but dont think this would count as additional protection as its not 30ma and would struggle to fit in meter box .

Thanks
I think you are over thinking it :santa_cheesy:
 
Lol things do play on my mind alot
The cables go up the cavity so are at a depth >50mm, are clipped to the top of the joists In the loft, don enter or pass through the bathroom so I don't see any reason for RCD protection unless the earthing arrangement is TT? Although the tails passing up the cavity isn't ideal some times you don't have much choice and have had to use the method myself in the past just advise the customer not to have the cavity filled with insulation.
 
wot he just said. ^^^^^^. no need for RCD on the tails .
 

Reply to When is supplementary bonding not required ? Tails not on rcd... in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hello. Non-electrician here. Failed an EICR yesterday as the electrician graded my consumer unit C2. Why C2 and not C3? He didn't say (and still...
Replies
22
Views
3K
Curious about supplementary bonding, I have these two 4mm Cables loose and not connected to anything in my parents house. I presume they are for...
Replies
9
Views
2K
Hello Need to replace a distribution board in the next few weeks to allow for more circuits to be installed in January. Existing is a TT system...
Replies
6
Views
1K
During an EICR meter tails were found entering the cavity and coming down a stud wall to a consumer unit about 5 meters (direct distance) away...
Replies
22
Views
5K
How would you code a bathroom with all insulated fittings , no supplementary bonding and not supplied by rcd . The old BPG4 seemed to suggest its...
Replies
4
Views
989

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock