Discuss Why did the Ra go from 180Ω to 14Ω? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

This sounds like Ze not Ra??

Nope,we are talking Ra,in it's meaning of "...total resistance of the earth electrode and the protective conductor connecting it to exposed parts..."
The methods used to test this,were not a bone of contention,in the OP's post.

My assertion that work carried out by any DNO,can vary the test readings,whatever method of test is used,stands.

I'm prepared to accept potAto/potARto,tomAto/tomARto...lets call the whole thing off...it was only the word "impossible",that got me going....:):):)
 
Ah....I have to admit that I don't possess an electrode tester, and only use the efli test method on tt.
I had it in my head that if you did a bone-fide Ra test, then you were literally just testing the electrode to the test probes in isolation, i.e. the earthing conductor would not be connected to the electrode under test.
If the earthing conductor remains connected, then the effects of any DNO activity could still be seen?
 
It is the method of choice,usually,due to many reasons. Not having easy access to disconnect the earthing conductor...not being able to stick your spikes in at the correct spacings...time...patience...etc

As for any work the DNO could do,having an effect on the readings on an earthing electrode,tested in isolation...again,unlikely but certainly possible - as are a myriad of other entities,being the cause of varying any other result we seek in life.

I have prided myself,on the ability to discover faults,where others had either failed,or give up. One of the most useful assets,in these endeavours,is never discount any variable - however bizarre or unlikely :)
 
Ah....I have to admit that I don't possess an electrode tester, and only use the efli test method on tt.
I had it in my head that if you did a bone-fide Ra test, then you were literally just testing the electrode to the test probes in isolation, i.e. the earthing conductor would not be connected to the electrode under test.
If the earthing conductor remains connected, then the effects of any DNO activity could still be seen?

Ra is a dead test. If you are carrying out the EFLI test, which is a live test, this is called Ze.
 
It is the method of choice,usually,due to many reasons. Not having easy access to disconnect the earthing conductor...not being able to stick your spikes in at the correct spacings...time...patience...etc

As for any work the DNO could do,having an effect on the readings on an earthing electrode,tested in isolation...again,unlikely but certainly possible - as are a myriad of other entities,being the cause of varying any other result we seek in life.

I have prided myself,on the ability to discover faults,where others had either failed,or give up. One of the most useful assets,in these endeavours,is never discount any variable - however bizarre or unlikely :)
the other useful asset needed is a client willing to pay for your protracted fault finding endeavours (unless you do it for free)
 
the other useful asset needed is a client willing to pay for your protracted fault finding endeavours (unless you do it for free)

Alas,yes,this would be the driving factor,i suppose,with many jobbing sparkies...

I do not fit in to that category,so my reasons for getting involved and stuck-in,to a quandary,are different.

Customers who tell you half a story,give you rules,times,costs and a flatulent pet,to work round....are NOT my idea of fun ;)

Those that have to face such obstacles,have my respect and sympathy:)
 
It is the method of choice,usually,due to many reasons. Not having easy access to disconnect the earthing conductor...not being able to stick your spikes in at the correct spacings...time...patience...etc

As for any work the DNO could do,having an effect on the readings on an earthing electrode,tested in isolation...again,unlikely but certainly possible - as are a myriad of other entities,being the cause of varying any other result we seek in life.

I have prided myself,on the ability to discover faults,where others had either failed,or give up. One of the most useful assets,in these endeavours,is never discount any variable - however bizarre or unlikely :)


Me too PEG , and today I was on such a fault finding mission. It involved measuring below and then lifting a 9"square of upstairs chipboard flooring- which still had the original old floorboards beneath. Fault 1 was a badly terminated live in a broken pendant base used as a JB in the void above the lounge light and fault 2 was a burned 1mm squashed behind a heating pipe, very satisfying to find,fix then test and get good results, I'm the 3rd Electrician called in to sort out this one [and the 1st invited via recommendation], knackered now though. :)
 
Yep ok, agree it wouldn't affect Ra if measured with electrode tester.
But it could change a Ze done with a loop tester, which I guess is what you're getting at?

So if there are dodgy DNO rods out there leading to a very high ELFI - Isn’t a Ze test more meaningful (and important) than a dead Ra test? After all, the touch voltage and the successful operation of the RCD depends on the EFLI being low enough. You could have the best customer earth rod in the world but if the nearby DNO rod is pants then the EFLI will be very high.
 
Opening myself up here, but I have very little knowledge of the electrics outside of the domestic situation.

Am I right in thinking that at the transformer there is an earth rod (similar to a domestic one, just bigger?) in the ground and this is attached to the neutral at the transformer?
 
It's Friday, I have popcorn and wine and am now awaiting Essex"s explanation as PEG rose to the challenge and gave his.

So Essex can we hear your theory for the argument on the flip side please?
I don’t see that happening, as the RA is just the resistance of the electrode and the earth conductor combined to earth.
Whereas what PEG is describing is the Ze.
 

Reply to Why did the Ra go from 180Ω to 14Ω? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

  • Question
Hi there, I’m a new member to the forum and felt like I could do with some additional insight into a fault I came across on a call-out at the...
Replies
6
Views
411
Hi, looking for some ideas on this. I went to an address on Tuesday following a storm where property has been struck by lightning. When the...
Replies
3
Views
716
This drives me round the twist, the client tells you what they want, kind of. you do the work the way the client asks you to and then when its all...
Replies
13
Views
2K
Hi guys, I've gotten AI to write up a terms and conditions for my company and then went through it with AI and tweaked it to make it sound a...
Replies
3
Views
341
So far I have never had to deal with a new supply but a possible site we are looking at will need some major changes and so I wondered if folks...
Replies
2
Views
693

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock