would it be legal to....(25 characters)

[elsparko]

In short, life too short, so is Frankie Dettori, as is your time left on this forum, I fear. Still there are others for your amusement

huh?

 

[Midwest]

huh?

It means I sometimes like the cut of your jib. Other times you are a complete arse IMO

 

[elsparko]

It means I sometimes like the cut of your jib. Other times you are a complete arse IMO

 

[static zap]

-- Fitting in may be boring / but its what the rest of us do ! (most-the-time) --

 

[davesparks]

Surely this will depend partly on how the person receiving the delivery of sand reacts?
If they accept it as a practical joke or revenge for something they have done then no problem. However if they call the police and wish to press charges it’s a different story.

 

[pirate]

Deliver anything that causes annoyance, grievance or harm to the recipient because they didn't order it/want It...
an offence

if it causes damage, another offence
if it distasteful, ie sexist, sectarian, racist...another offence


any combination of the above...
aggravated offence

 

[Midwest]

Deliver anything that causes annoyance, grievance or harm to the recipient because they didn't order it/want It...
an offence

Great, next time the Jehovah Witness's come knocking, and shrove the Watch Tower through my letterbox, I can get them done for criminal damage

I've guess this case would have to rely on precedents IMO. Googled Henderson and Battley, R v (1984) CA, relates to D damaged land by allowing 30 lorry loads of soil and rubble and mud to be tipped on to the site. D, pretending to act with authority, had been operating the site as a public tip and charging their customers for the rubbish which was tipped. Found guilty.

Still doesn't fit, as in this case, the guilty parties were in control of the lorries, where as elsparko merely paid for the sand to be delivered.

What the hell.

 

[Percyprod]

Can' be that bad or it would be concrete.

 

[Percyprod]

Can't bethat bad or it would be concrete.