Currently reading:
Cpc no continuity on pendants

Discuss Cpc no continuity on pendants in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

cliffed

-
Arms
Supporter
Reaction score
650
EICR picked up no continuity on cpc on 3 pendants fittings in a grd Floor Flat.
Zs measured @ other pendants & complies.
Different opinions on the coding personally a C2 for me..but others are saying C3 mainly because of the code guidance in code breakers.
I think this statement relates to no cpc in cabling, the circuit above are all Class II fittings mainly pendants & batten holders.
b02b2deb-31f1-4348-bc32-3db01e805935.jpeg
 
I often come across jobs where the lighting is wired in T&E but the lazy sparks rather than connect the cpc they snip them all out at the switches and fittings.
which is a real fig trying to get just enough on the cpc to attempt to get a joint onto it. sometimes is possible sometimes not possible. Imo snipping all of the cpcs out leave the job in an unsafe state and I would code as C2 as at any given stage the home owner can put up a metal fitting or metal switch
 
EICR picked up no continuity on cpc on 3 pendants fittings in a grd Floor Flat.
Zs measured @ other pendants & complies.
Different opinions on the coding personally a C2 for me..but others are saying C3 mainly because of the code guidance in code breakers.
I think this statement relates to no cpc in cabling, the circuit above are all Class II fittings mainly pendants & batten holders.
View attachment 113275
That statement isn't relevant as there are cpcs present, Code 2.
 
Code 2 as well.
It could easily be changed for a class 1 light fitting by DIY Dave. Plus, the CPC's are not absent, they are there and not working.
I've asked the same question a couple of times (slightly different scenarios) in the past. A common area of confusion.
 
Agree try telling Others… I’ve actually coded C2😎
Do you have a copy of code breakers Cliff? Do you find it worthwhile to have? 25% of me fancies getting one. Although I suspect it'll need updating regularly at a silly cost.
 
Do you have a copy of code breakers Cliff? Do you find it worthwhile to have? 25% of me fancies getting one. Although I suspect it'll need updating regularly at a silly cost.
Don't sink to that level! Your professional opinion based on your experience is worth a lot more than what the profiteering paint-by-numbers brigade at Napit think!
 
I often come across jobs where the lighting is wired in T&E but the lazy sparks rather than connect the cpc they snip them all out at the switches and fittings.
which is a real fig trying to get just enough on the cpc to attempt to get a joint onto it.
My latest trick for this....if completely desperate and you have 3 very short cables ....
Make a hole big enough for a quickwire to fit through.
Stick a quickwire splitter on the switch wire, attach a new length of T&E and push into void.
Stick a quickwire switch and load on the loop in and loop out (both same end of adapter), attach your new switch cable, and attach a length of T&E to the load connection. Push that into void.
You are left with one new cable that has a CPC. Make mental note to 10 quid to bill.
 

Reply to Cpc no continuity on pendants in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top