Currently reading:
What is this and is it normal? Council electrics

Discuss What is this and is it normal? Council electrics in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

RyanA

-
Reaction score
5
It's been almost 4 years since the council updated all the electrics in the house, at the time they moved the fuse box to the back wall rather than the side wall. Today curiosity got the better of me and I'm just wondering what this is, as it doesn't look normal. At the time a council inspector looked everything over and said it was OK.

Basically wires coming through the wall where the fusebox used to be, going into this little bar with screw things on it, they just plastered over all the wires. From the little bar are more wires going into the fusebox.

What is this, and is it normal/safe?

IMG_20171229_230122[1].jpg


IMG_20171229_230130[1].jpg
 
Thanks that all makes sense. But in an earth fault condition, that would still become live - and would be the last connected conductive part before ground. Does that not make it potentially more dangerous to be in contact with?
Everything should rise at the same potential or there abouts. Obviously factors like length/resistance of bonding conductors etc can have an influence. The situation you've put forward is no different to touching an exposed conductive part and an extraneous conductive part at the same time whilst an earth fault is occurring. This is why Zs values, bonding, earthing etc is adheared to as part of the protective measure ADS.
 
Everything should rise at the same potential or there abouts. Obviously factors like length/resistance of bonding conductors etc can have an influence. The situation you've put forward is no different to touching an exposed conductive part and an extraneous conductive part at the same time whilst an earth fault is occurring. This is why Zs values, bonding, earthing etc is adheared to as part of the protective measure ADS.

Thanks. Not being a spark myself I have only a limited grasp on how potential works. So in basic terms, yes the entire earth network is 'live' in an earth fault scenario, but anyone touching any part of it has such a tiny potential compared to ground, that they will receive a super low voltage and probably not even notice? And a bird sat on a wire has zero potential so they get no voltage at all.
 
Thanks. Not being a spark myself I have only a limited grasp on how potential works. So in basic terms, yes the entire earth network is 'live' in an earth fault scenario, but anyone touching any part of it has such a tiny potential compared to ground, that they will receive a super low voltage and probably not even notice? And a bird sat on a wire has zero potential so they get no voltage at all.
If you had an Earth fault and the installation Earth was disconnected, then there could be a problem.
 
Yes that's an earth terminal. It's normal to have such a terminal, but not normal for the terminal to be exposed. The earth circuit should be treated and protected as if it were live, as that's literally what it's there for. If there is a fault, to carry the live current back to the earth... So if you get a fault, that becomes live and it's exposed...

I'm not a qualified spark but I'd avoid fiddling with/licking the terminal.
This is an earthing arrangement in a larger building. Perfectly safe and normal to have it exposed
19D9AA8E-D942-4FC8-A405-E2BC97A5106A.jpeg
 
...It just seems crazy to leave the final part of the earth network of the entire house exposed like that. What is the point?

The point is that there is no special danger to the MET. It is likely to be connected to gas and water pipework, along with any metal taps, baths, sinks, boilers, etc. If the consumer unit is metal, it'll be connected to that too.

So there's no additional safety to be gained by covering this particular item of earthed metalwork.
 
The OP came on here for advice and reassurance, fair enough as dodgy electrics can be lethal . I don't understand how one or two here seem to be looking down their noses due to the property being a Council House. We all know that it's become more and more difficult to own your home in recent years and I hate this snobbish attitude.
I see your point, I personally think i would rather live in the old social / council housing around here than some of the modern fancy ones. they were built well in 50s and 60s and had a decent clerk of works from council sign them off before anybody could move in, they have far fewer issues than a lot of the newer homes. But people are too up themselves to see the benefits of buying one, bigger rooms and more affordable as less maintenance. its all about keeping up with the jones's
 
Spot on mate, I remember wiring some new council homes around 30 years ago and the Clerk of Works would check the socket heights with a steel rule and measure the centre of each room to check the lights were spot on, he couldn't beat me though. :)
 
I think its a good thing the OP has asked the question. Most people wouldn't even think about it, and would probably hang their feather dusters and wellies from the cables. Nothing wrong with your question at all - just remember as has been said above by Lee and others, it's the equipotential bonding that is the key.
 
Thanks that all makes sense. But in an earth fault condition, that would still become live - and would be the last connected conductive part before ground. Does that not make it potentially more dangerous to be in contact with?

Edit I appreciate that no matter what most current will still want to travel to ground, not through anyone touching it - but there is still some low level risk of making contact isn't there?
Ok, Lee has already explained this but since you are not a qualified spark I will briefly explain it to you in basic lay mans terms.

Its all about potential. basically what this means is that current will flow down the path of least resistance, the better the conductor the better the current will flow. So in a fault condition to prevent shock, if someone was unfortunate enough to come into contact with an exposed conductive part, we want to divert as much current from passing through that person as possible. The amount of current passing through the person depends (basically) on what the voltage is and what the resistance is between the person and earth and the "live" part. Hence why birds can sit on high powered supply lines and not get harmed, the resistance to earth is so high (because they are not in contact with the earth) so the current cannot flow.
Now basically what the earthing and bonding do in an electrical installation is to make all exposed & extraneous conductive parts at an equal potential and the path to earth as least resistive as possible (there is a bit more to it than that but we won't go into the details). So even during a direct fault where the current flowing through the earth conductor is high, directly touching it (depending on a few factors) will not give you a harmful shock because the current will mainly flow through the path of least resistance (the earth conductor).
In addition there are protection devices - fuses, mcbs, rcd... in place so that if this fault was to arise then the supply would be cut very quickly so the high fault current would only pass through the conductor for a very brief moment.

All this is basically what Lee mentioned and is commonly termed as - ADS.

Hope this explains it for you.
 
Thanks that all makes sense. But in an earth fault condition, that would still become live - and would be the last connected conductive part before ground. Does that not make it potentially more dangerous to be in contact with?

Edit I appreciate that no matter what most current will still want to travel to ground, not through anyone touching it - but there is still some low level risk of making contact isn't there?
Ok, Lee has already explained this but since you are not a qualified spark I will briefly explain it to you in basic lay mans terms.

Its all about potential.
Basically what this means is that current will flow down the path of least resistance, the better the conductor the better the current will flow. So in a fault condition to prevent shock, if someone was unfortunate enough to come into contact with an exposed conductive part, we want to divert as much current from passing through that person as possible. The amount of current passing through the person depends (basically) on what the voltage is and what the resistance is between the live part, person and earth. Hence why birds can sit on high powered supply lines and not get harmed, the resistance to earth is so high (because they are not in contact with the earth) the current cannot easily flow.
Now basically what the earthing and bonding do in an electrical installation is to make all exposed & extraneous conductive parts at an equal potential and the path to earth as least resistive as possible (there is a bit more to it than that but we won't go into the details). So even during a direct fault where the current flowing through the earth conductor is high, directly touching it (depending on a few factors) will not give you a harmful shock because the current will mainly flow through the path of least resistance (the earth conductor).
In addition there are protection devices - fuses, mcbs, rcds... in place so that if a fault was to arise they are designed to cut the supply very quickly so the fault current would only pass through the earth conductor for a very brief moment. In other words its extremely unlikely that anyone would be in contact with the earth conductor, or in the case of the OP connection point, plus creating a lower resistance to earth, for the brief moment a fault current was being conducted.

All this is basically what Lee mentioned and is commonly termed as - ADS.

And for you trainees out there - all this is why it is very important that during your installs and testing that you ensure that all the earthing & bonding is present and correct. It is the most important thing to consider for an electrical installation!

Hope this explains it for you.
 
Last edited:
why are people complaining about the state of the electrics when people living ruff on the streets .bugs me

Really? So you can do work "as rough as" and if a customer complains, you just tell them your lucky not to be living on the streets?

Step daughter moved into a council property and it was terrible the state she was expected to live in..They had supposedly carried out renovation and the work was supposedly inspected, but the guy must have been blind..Luckily myself and her father were able to make things decent and advise her what she need to chase the council about re sub standard work on the electrics plumbing plus safety issues re the garden fencing...
 

Reply to What is this and is it normal? Council electrics in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock