Currently reading:
3/5/13 Amp Fuses For Plugs And Fused Spurs...

Discuss 3/5/13 Amp Fuses For Plugs And Fused Spurs... in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

OnlQQker

Esteemed
Reaction score
1,275
As most people really don't have an understanding of electricity whatsoever, and the amount of times I have come across the wrong size fuse in a plug or FCU.

I don't know but surely this should be addressed somehow.

Moulded plugs are all good as well on the new table lamp somebody has just purchased, but one day the fuse blows and a 13amp one is most of the time shoved back in.

Seems rather a deadly issue to me!

Just thinking out loud again.
 
some numpty takes out a 3A fuse and replaces with a 13A. BOOM ...... Darwinism strikes again.
 
I agree. I have a friend (okay, hard to believe but it's true) that blew a 3A fuse in a plug. They replaced it with a 13A as 'I thought the higher number would be better'. I know some items come with little stickers on the plug giving the fuse size but how many people read that. But, apart from different physical sized fuses that will only fit into plugs for that size fuse, what can be done?
 
But, apart from different physical sized fuses that will only fit into plugs for that size fuse, what can be done?

but we don't want firefighters on the dole through lack of work, do we?
 
But, apart from different physical sized fuses that will only fit into plugs for that size fuse, what can be done?
That is a good idea, just think of all the work you can get changing every plug in your own house let alone in everyone else's, or would everyone just keep on using 13amp Hmmmm assuming they where the bigger size, no another thought make 13amp the smallest size so it does not fit the existing plugs, force change and built in obsolescence, now we are getting somewhere.
 
I think you have that backwards, the original design called for metal cladding with non flammable insulation between it and the building, the local authority and fire officer allowed the change which ultimately led to the disaster, no one learnt anything from the Oraglass incident at the Theme Park, think it was on the Isle of White.
 
Not much can be done that has not already been done. Appliances have labels saying what fuse to use, the fuses are labelled and usually colour-coded as well, and 5 min on any web browser will pull up all you need to know about fuse ratings for all levels of knowledge. Not to mention the blindingly obvious of getting an electrician's help.

And yet idiots will be idiots. And I mean it. Not lack of knowledge, but an almost wilful attempt to avoid learning or accepting any answer that is not what they wanted to hear.

Sadly that goes far beyond the question of what replacement fuse to use.
 
I think you have that backwards, the original design called for metal cladding with non flammable insulation between it and the building, the local authority and fire officer allowed the change which ultimately led to the disaster, no one learnt anything from the Oraglass incident at the Theme Park, think it was on the Isle of White.
That's the boys. They seem pretty good at getting plastic changed to metal though.
I think this referred to the change from plastic to metal consumer units...
 
Off on a tangent, what's the point of the plastic plug cover over the pins that's supplied with every new appliance? Straight into landfill once the item is unboxed.
 
Do you mean that organisation that allowed a flammable material to be used as cladding on a tower block.
I disagree, the brigade no longer have the authority they once did.

Their sign off is little more than a paper exercise and a cursory once over these days so as long as you put a compliant spec in front of them they sign it off.

The dilution of the brigades role in fire worthiness inspecting has been a long, steady and slow affair to the point now I doubt very much they have sufficient expertise to carry out the role they once did.

Its how it seems to me anyhow.
 
I think you have that backwards, the original design called for metal cladding with non flammable insulation between it and the building, the local authority and fire officer allowed the change which ultimately led to the disaster, no one learnt anything from the Oraglass incident at the Theme Park, think it was on the Isle of White.
https://g.co/kgs/JmVKtA

A quick Google for those (like me) that don't know of the disaster, fire startedby kids discarded cigs,fuel fuelled greatly by the building materials

The local authority/fire officer allowing the change isn't exactly fair, it was Arconis that gave (or didn't as the case was,) updated test results from EU tests showing the Reybond PE (iirc) was in fact utter rubbish in terms of Fire Safety and because this information was withheld, the LA/FO acted on information at the time, which gave the material a better fire safety rating than it had and because of this no-one questioned it.
 
I disagree, the brigade no longer have the authority they once did.

Their sign off is little more than a paper exercise and a cursory once over these days so as long as you put a compliant spec in front of them they sign it off.

The dilution of the brigades role in fire worthiness inspecting has been a long, steady and slow affair to the point now I doubt very much they have sufficient expertise to carry out the role they once did
Its how it seems to me anyhow.
That's the point, at planning stage the fire brigade still have the responsibility to sign off the compliance to the regulations of the materials to be used and specified in the application, the specification of the cladding did not conform to the requirement of flame spread and has since been changed on a number of other tower blocks because of this.
 
I think you have that backwards, the original design called for metal cladding with non flammable insulation between it and the building, the local authority and fire officer allowed the change which ultimately led to the disaster, no one learnt anything from the Oraglass incident at the Theme Park, think it was on the Isle of White.
They allowed changes based on the advice given by the manufacturers, contractors and designers that it would still be compliant.

I would love the brigade to have the teeth it once had but it has been defanged, intentionally and for profit.
 
That's the point, at planning stage the fire brigade still have the responsibility to sign off the compliance to the regulations of the materials to be used and specified in the application, the specification of the cladding did not conform to the requirement of flame spread and has since been changed on a number of other tower blocks because of this.
My understanding was that it did comply but did not perform as specified because the test data had been fiddled.

Could be wrong, I'll have a Google, be right back.
 

Reply to 3/5/13 Amp Fuses For Plugs And Fused Spurs... in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top