the fact is:
just because it is considered a `static`...this does not mean that it cant be moved...at any time...
its just a case of getting a flatbed...and a winch to drag it on with...
so consequently the DNO are justified in considering them moveable/portable/not perminant structures....
I'm trying to understand these comments (which make sense) with respect to the regs.
Bear in mind my status (see sig) I am only trying to increase my knowledge, so please tell me where my reasoning is out.
721 "Electrical Installations in caravans and motor caravans"
721.1 Scope
Blah blah
"They do not apply to the electrical installations of mobile homes, residential park homes and tranportable units.
NOTE 1: For mobile homes and residential park homes the general requirements apply"
"Mobile homes" are defined in Part 2: "A transortable leisure accomodation vehicle which includes means for mobility but does not meet the requirements for construction and use of road vehicles."
So this is your "static caravan" and, whether lived in all year round or not, makes no difference to the regs, and isn't covered by 721.
Given the OP's description of the caravan site, I'd say 721 isn't relevant. Anyone beg to differ?
Then I looked at 708 "Electrical Installations in Caravan / Camping Parks and Similar Locations"
708.1 Scope
"The particular requirements of this section apply to that portion of the electrical installation in caravan / camping parks and similar locations providing facilities for supplying leisure accommodation vehicles (including caravans) or tents."
Part 2 defines leisure accommodation vehicle: "Unit of living accommodation for temporary or seasonal occupation which may meet requirements for construction and use of road vehicles."
The important word there is "may" - so if it doesn't, but is nevertheless a unit of living accommodation for temporary or seasonal occupation, it's within the remit of 708. To me, this says, "static holiday homes are covered, residential homes are not." Anyone beg to differ?
708.411.4 states that ESQCR prohibits connection of PME earthing facility to any metalwork of your... let's just call it a van... your van.
708.530.3 Caravan pitch supply equipment "... shall be located adjacent to the pitch and not more than 20m from the connection facility on the [van] when on its pitch."
BGB does not define "supply equipment" but I read this as "switchgear and control gear". So, RCDs, overcurrent protective devices etc. So this says to me, "if you're going to have an RCD/MCB, it has to be near the van." Anyone beg to differ?
Now, it's been 20 years since I lived on a caravan park (which my folks owned, up near Bradford), but in them days, statics didn't come with nice shiny ceeforms. They were wired in by a [qualified] electrician (a bloke called Ian, in our case), like a permanent installation.
708.553.1 talks about "plugs and socket-outlets" but there are some paragraphs relating to fixed connections:
708.553.1.12: "Blah... A fixed connection for supply to each [van] shall be protected individually by an overcurrent protective device, in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 43."
I take this to mean, "You need an MCB or similar, but it doesn't proscribe what value, for a fixed installation." Anyone beg to differ?
708.553.1.13: "Blah... Final circuits intended for fixed connection connection of the supply to [vans] shall be protected individually by an RCD having the characteristics specified in Regulation 415.1.1."
(415.1.1 is under additional protection, states "30mA RCD").
So taking all that into account, I read the requirements for static caravans, with a fixed supply (ie not connected by ceeform), there should be a 30mA RCD and an overcurrent protective device within 20m of the van.
Now, where the "two 30mA RCDs in series" bit comes in I don't know, as I haven't read the whole of the BGB yet (I'm working on it!). From a pragmatic point of view, if your van's CU also had a 30mA RCD fitted then yeah, there'd be no discrimination, so you wouldn't know which one would go... but if it happened to be the one in the van, you might save yourself having to go out in your dressing gown and slippers. 531.2.9 talks about discrimination and RCDs in series, "the characteristics of the devices shall be such that the intended discrimination is achieved." HOWEVER, this is only required "where discrimination in their operation is necessary to prevent danger," and I don't perceive this to be the case, here. Anyone beg to differ?
Like I say, just trying to learn. Still confused by "the DNO are justified in considering them moveable/portable/not perminant structures" which as I say does make sense, but through lack of experience an knowledge I don't know what the relevance of this is.
Owt wrong with any of my reasoning with respect to scope and relevant bits of the BGB?