Claiming Jobseekers

[trev]

I wouldn't be too upset if they scrapped the whole thing to be honest.

The only problems there are A) Crime rates would increase dramatically as the workshy would turn to/commit more offending
and B) what do we do with the unemployable of which there are legions. I'm not talking about people with disabilities which could prevent them working, I mean the ones who no employer in their right mind would take on.
Cannon fodder maybe?

 

[StuSpiers]

A) All the Benefit money can be diverted into police.
B) They starve - Yes being serious, it happens all over the world if people are lazy and inept then tough **** I am too long in the tooth to loose any sleep over them.

I lived in Thailand for two years they take that attitude and it was a pleasant surprise - It actually works well.
However I didn't like the fact they didn't look after the disabled.

 

[Octopus]

I currently get over £200 a week in child tax and working tax credits.

That's a stupid amount of money, yes I need it currently but it could quite easily make alot of people lazy.
I'm not claiming JSA at the moment because of unrelated issue but that would be anouther £70 a week.
Then there is housing benefit again I'm not claiming.
Then there is council tax benefit I'm not claiming.

etc etc

If I was claiming all of those what on earth would be the incentive to work?
Now I come from an upbringing that makes me wan't to work but lot's of people don't.

Too much welfare in this country.

I'm a little mystified, you're getting £200 per week in tax credits, which works out to be about £15K before tax - are you or your partner working?

 

[StuSpiers]

New business started in apr this year.

Estimated earnings for this year = LOSS

Wife doesn't work no.

And I agree £200 a week is ludacrose but am I going to turn it down if thats what they offer? ........

 

[Octopus]

New business started in apr this year.

Estimated earnings for this year = LOSS

Wife doesn't work no.

And I agree £200 a week is ludacrose but am I going to turn it down if thats what they offer? ........

Got 2 views on that:

1. Why don't they offer this sort of financial support for new business start ups??

2. No wonder some people sit around and take cash jobs on the side!!


Good luck with the new venture.

 

[Adam W]

Sorry to bring this up because it seemed to have been dropped but this woman has claimed benefits from the government. She hasn't worked for the money she has told them that she needed it when she clearly didn't. Benefits should be for people in need not people who just want to save the money for a nest egg in her retirement. Just because she's better than most of the scroungers out there by not smoking or drinking doesn't make her right. All she has done is proven that the people who WILL NOT go to work gets too much money. If you have no intention of going to work then you should not be able to afford to smoke drink or have sky at the very least??

That is the argument as to why she shouldn't have the money.
She wasn't claiming out of work benefits because she couldn't be bothered to work, she was claiming incapacity benefit because the idea is she couldn't work. She chose to live a meagre lifestyle so she could save for retirement; if anyone were given the choice between having money to spend or not having money to spend then they would chose the money - it's a no-brainer. If the woman in the article had been given the choice of using the money or losing it she may have chosen to live a more frivolous lifestyle, or maybe spend the money on antiques or gold instead.

I agree with everyone else in that anyone capable of working should pay their own way in life, but there should also be support for those who genuinely can't, and IMO that money should be spent on whatever is deemed most important by the individual, whether it be spending straight away or spending later.
Consider the situation of a benefit claimant wanting or needing to spend a large sum of money on some kind of equipment (eg a vehicle) or an operation which they can't get on the NHS - should they be stopped from saving for this because some pencil-pusher thinks they should be spending their money on other things? Similarly if they were to buy said item on credit that might be considered an ongoing expense so might technically be allowed, even though they would have to pay a load extra in interest which someone on incapacity benefit is unlikely to be able to afford.

 

[alarm man]

That is the argument as to why she shouldn't have the money.
She wasn't claiming out of work benefits because she couldn't be bothered to work, she was claiming incapacity benefit because the idea is she couldn't work. She chose to live a meagre lifestyle so she could save for retirement; if anyone were given the choice between having money to spend or not having money to spend then they would chose the money - it's a no-brainer. If the woman in the article had been given the choice of using the money or losing it she may have chosen to live a more frivolous lifestyle, or maybe spend the money on antiques or gold instead.

I agree with everyone else in that anyone capable of working should pay their own way in life, but there should also be support for those who genuinely can't, and IMO that money should be spent on whatever is deemed most important by the individual, whether it be spending straight away or spending later.
Consider the situation of a benefit claimant wanting or needing to spend a large sum of money on some kind of equipment (eg a vehicle) or an operation which they can't get on the NHS - should they be stopped from saving for this because some pencil-pusher thinks they should be spending their money on other things? Similarly if they were to buy said item on credit that might be considered an ongoing expense so might technically be allowed, even though they would have to pay a load extra in interest which someone on incapacity benefit is unlikely to be able to afford.

the fact she's saving for her retirement(most dont have that luxury) or should we say while we are helping her save for retirement shows she's claiming too much,if she chooses to live like she does thats her choice,shes claiming what she doesnt need,and thats greed,while some lads on here have paid in they are not getting the same out when they need the help,shes single lives with a dog,some have a wife and kids, they are the ones that need more,each according to his needs..no wonder people kick off.

 

[Dave 85]

the fact she's saving for her retirement(most dont have that luxury) or should we say while we are helping her save for retirement shows she's claiming too much,if she chooses to live like she does thats her choice,shes claiming what she doesnt need,and thats greed,while some lads on here have paid in they are not getting the same out when they need the help,shes single lives with a dog,some have a wife and kids, they are the ones that need more,each according to his needs..no wonder people kick off.

Saving money is not a luxury!!!
Its a state of mind. Its what sensible people do from an early age. Polish people come to this country and work for diddly squat, yet they still manage to save money.
Why?
Because they were raised in a country that doesn't mollycoddle them like children and absolve them of any responsiblity for their own financial affairs.

So people who save money are greedy?
Never heard it put like that before.....
I must be one fat greedy barstool...maybe I should do the decent thing and go and p*ss all my savings up the wall on drink and drugs. Then if I have a few days without work I can go and claim my due off the already struggling national budget.
This is verging on communism alarm man....

 

[mickys86]

I really think the aim of bitterness towards her savings is the fact she was claiming when she didn't need to

 

[Dave 85]

The only problems there are A) Crime rates would increase dramatically as the workshy would turn to/commit more offending
and B) what do we do with the unemployable of which there are legions. I'm not talking about people with disabilities which could prevent them working, I mean the ones who no employer in their right mind would take on.
Cannon fodder maybe?

Thats not a bad Idea...
We get all the workshy and criminals, put em in redcoats, give em muskets, the french do the same with theirs, but the coats are blue, put em in a field and let em stand in lines and blast holes through each other.
It worked before, It'll work again.