Discuss Insulation Resistance Testing Am2 - requires to be tested twice in the Electrical Testing & PAT Testing Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm a little confused confused is someone can shine some light on the amendment 2 way of doing IR.
I know you have to do one 1st fix at 500V DC and then final one at 250V DC when all cables.
What I'm confused about is GN3 states:

"...sometimes these cables are terminated without further testing. This is no longer acceptable: it is now essential to test the protective conductor (such as armouring) with this connected via a fly-lead if necessary. To the installation earthing arrangement."

In other words it means IR testing the lines conductors clamping to the Banjo. The banjo will need a temporary connection to the MET for test purposes. (fig 2.23 shows an example of that)

Does that mean steel containment conduit will require this as well as its not specifically mentioned neither its used as a protective conductor.

Thanks people!
 
Does that mean steel containment conduit will require this as well as its not specifically mentioned neither its used as a protective conductor.
IMHO the principles are

1 - Sensible testing during installation e.g. making sure singles in steel conduit are not damaged and in contact with the containment, or the conductors in MICC are not breaching the outer copper core

2 - Mandatory 500v tests prior to loads / accessories being fitted with everything that is going to be earthed and bonded connected to the earthing system. This includes the armour of SWA, or steel trunking or conduit. Usually glanding into the switch gear and fitting banjo's / earthing nuts will achieve this.

3 - Mandatory final 250v tests when 2nd fixed.

For the mandatory IR tests to be valuable the earthing system needs to be completely intact. It can sometimes create challenges but we always find a way don't we!
 
Ahh, I see so in other words your saying on your no.2 point.
Connect the CPC earth and fly lead bonding of the steel conduit to the earthing arrangement. (using wander lead maybe)
Then test at 500vDC

Thanks it has cleared it the way you said it.
 
The reason for testing with all the CPC & metalwork to the MET is to catch a situation like T&E with one of the live conductors nicked by a screw. If you test L-CPC alone (with CPC floating) that might be perfectly good if the screw has not breached both and you would not see the fault.

However, with the CPC to the MET and thus to the Earth at large (and hence now to the screw) there is a good chance you will see the fault as a suspiciously low IR for brand new cable, more so if you see something like >299M for N-CPC and, say, 10M L-CPC, then something is clearly not right even though at this point it actually passes the usual thresholds, etc.
 
Ahh, I see so in other words your saying on your no.2 point.
Connect the CPC earth and fly lead bonding of the steel conduit to the earthing arrangement. (using wander lead maybe)
Then test at 500vDC

Thanks it has cleared it the way you said it.

I can't see a need for any wander lead or temporary connection for IR testing, what do you think needs a temporary connection?

All of your conductors should already be connected by the time you do the testing.
 
I can't see a need for any wander lead or temporary connection for IR testing, what do you think needs a temporary connection?

All of your conductors should already be connected by the time you do the testing.
Hi, Sorry for late reply.

To my understanding of the GN3 Amendment 2 it states it here during install and then after install.
1st test: 500V IR test with the protective conductor connected to the earthing arrangement.
2nd Test: 250V with everything in place (except sensitive equipment obviously)
 

Attachments

  • 20230820_125635.jpg
    441.2 KB · Views: 19
I think that's the rough idea, though the sensitive equipment IS connected for the second test, and no insulation test is carried out L-N for that test. That's how we do it anyway. If the equipment can't take 250V between live conductors and earth, it shouldn't be connected to the supply at all.

I like how that tester switch is labelled 'insolation'...

Edit, I've just see this is another old thread...
 

Reply to Insulation Resistance Testing Am2 - requires to be tested twice in the Electrical Testing & PAT Testing Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi everyone, I'm nearly on my AM2 test and really enjoy the industrial side of things so I thought I'd learn by asking. I recently came across...
Replies
1
Views
748
Hello all, I've just been perusing the AM2/E/S threads on here. Thought you might like a bit of a review. If, like I did, you find yourself...
Replies
7
Views
2K
I've started to move over to AMD 2 forms for my CU installs, if only because the schedule is so much easier to tick and I can stop sticking labels...
Replies
4
Views
1K
Over the last few days, I have stumbled across a number of threads that seem to point to a prevalent misunderstanding. Either that, or I have been...
Replies
6
Views
2K
Hi all. As I've said before, I'm not an electrician but an adult learner. I have a second hand Fluke 1653B MFT which is out of calibration but I...
Replies
20
Views
15K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock