Pv on rcd

[uksparks]

How is a 6A MCB with a shunt trip going to hold a contractor open?

It it will hold it closed sorry, then when triggered it will release the contactor and shut the PV end off.

 

[GEOFF S]

I have to say this is a really interesting thread!

if we need to disconnect both ends, how about this.

from the main db, circuit starts with an RCBO, then connected to that would be a 6A MCB on a shunt and that circuit holds open a NO contactor which the inverter end is connected to (the one that runs back to the main db).

so by doing this, should there be overload or earth fault on that circuit, thevRCBO will trip and disconnect the line at the board end and open the contactor disconnecting both line and neutral from the inverter. But would this disconnect or open the contactor in the right time to comply?

Just a thought?? No idea if it would be ok or not

Hi

Im lost, whats this disconnect both ends about? The inverter must disconect within 5 secs, as we cant connect to Final circuit the a Distribution circuit it is, 5 Sec disconection.

Cheers

 

[uksparks]

Two RCDs may not suffice, if the inverter is earth referenced through a solid link then it should work, but if it's earth referenced through a resistance or through fortuitous connection it may not.

The bottom line that most of us were getting at is that the circuit should be designed so that RCD protection is not required, which isn't exactly difficult really.

Even if it's on an MCB you will still have the issue of two supplies.

 

[uksparks]

Hi

Im lost, whats this disconnect both ends about? The inverter must disconect within 5 secs, as we cant connect to Final circuit the a Distribution circuit it is, 5 Sec disconection.

Cheers

but if you create an earth fault or even dead short or whatever, the PV could still be feeding the circuit that you should hope would be dead.

 

[davesparks]

It it will hold it closed sorry, then when triggered it will release the contactor and shut the PV end off.

You don't actually know what a shunt trip is do you?

A shunt trip is a unit which you can fit to an MCB to allow it to be tripped by a remote signal. They can be used to add RCD protection to larger mcbs or mccbs/acbs by using an earth leakage relay connects to a shunt trip to operate the breaker.

This is why I suggested that a DP MCB at the inverter fitted with a shunt trip which is operated by an auxiliary contact on the RCD at the CU end might provide adequate protection.

 

[davesparks]

Even if it's on an MCB you will still have the issue of two supplies.

What issue of two supplies?

 

[davesparks]

Hi

Im lost, whats this disconnect both ends about? The inverter must disconect within 5 secs, as we cant connect to Final circuit the a Distribution circuit it is, 5 Sec disconection.

Cheers

It came up as a result of the mention of a PV circuit being provided with RCD protection.
I suggested the only way a PV circuit which requires 30mA RCD could be provided with it is if the RCD disconnects both ends of the supply.
But I thought it would illustrate why a PV circuit should be designed to not need RCD protection,

 

[uksparks]

I didn't mean a shunt, I mean one of those things you use to fix an indicator to an MCB for example, I can't think what they are called, I call them a shunt, it's probably not but Hager do them anyway.

 

[Deleted member 26818]

Two RCDs may not suffice, if the inverter is earth referenced through a solid link then it should work, but if it's earth referenced through a resistance or through fortuitous connection it may not.

The bottom line that most of us were getting at is that the circuit should be designed so that RCD protection is not required, which isn't exactly difficult really.

Don't see why an RCD would be affected by the inverter being referenced to earth?
Difficult, I'd say virtually impossible with a TT installation.

 

[GEOFF S]

As far as I am aware, these particular inverters do not require type B RCDs.
I know that the earth and neutral are linked by visual inspection.
I was interested in why there is a neutral for 3 phase inverters, when to my mind there would be no need, as there is no transformer to connect a neutral to the star point.
As no one I asked could provide an answer as to whether a neutral is required, I thought I would investigate the next inverter I got hold of.
There is a wiring block to connect the output conductors, then some short lengths of conductors to over voltage surge arresters, with blank modules for the earth and neutral, the other side of the surge arresters, is where the earth and neutral are linked, with only the earth and phase conductors continuing into the innards of the inverter.

Something that puzzles me, is how the inverter knows there is a connection to the grid?
Does the inverter pause the output from the inverter to measure the grid, or is there some manner that the inverter can differentiate between the grid voltage and the inverter voltage?

Hi

All inverters with no simple seperation require RCD type b protection.

I can only assume the inverter reacts the same as a tx, three phase unbalanced load, neutral current, connecting the neutral to earth to tie star point down etc.

The inverter will need to synchronise with the grid voltage, id assume at this point it can differentiate.

Cheers

 

[GEOFF S]

It came up as a result of the mention of a PV circuit being provided with RCD protection.
I suggested the only way a PV circuit which requires 30mA RCD could be provided with it is if the RCD disconnects both ends of the supply.
But I thought it would illustrate why a PV circuit should be designed to not need RCD protection,

Hi

Only one rcd would be required at teh output of the Inverter.

Cheers

 

[Deleted member 26818]

Not for a fault in the cable between the inverter and mains.
As has already been posted, if an RCD were to cut the power from the inverter, it would leave the power from the mains connected.
There would need to be one at each end of the cable, one for the mains and one for the inverter.

 

[davesparks]

I didn't mean a shunt, I mean one of those things you use to fix an indicator to an MCB for example, I can't think what they are called, I call them a shunt, it's probably not but Hager do them anyway.

There's a multitude of devices which can be added to breakers to perform any function you want

 

[davesparks]

Hi

Only one rcd would be required at teh output of the Inverter.

Cheers

But then the grid supply would not be disconnected in the event of a fault.
This is a cable with a source of supply at both ends.

 

[davesparks]

Don't see why an RCD would be affected by the inverter being referenced to earth?
Difficult, I'd say virtually impossible with a TT installation.

If the inverter N is solidly referenced to E then the RCD will work. If the inverter N is not referenced to earth then the RCD is unnecessary as you have an electrically separate supply so it cannot deliver a shock.
But what if there is a N-E link which is fortuitous?
(I don't know the answer and am probably overthinking now)

 

[davesparks]

Don't see why an RCD would be affected by the inverter being referenced to earth?
Difficult, I'd say virtually impossible with a TT installation.

In a TT you would still want to design the circuit to not need 30mA RCD, only the fault protection RCD which is likely to required, and ensure that the inverter used does not include a N-E link so providing a n electrically separate supply when not connected to the grid.


In theory (and yes it is an unconomical and borederline daft theory) you could avoid any RCD protection completely by using double insulation as the protective measure for the circuit instead of ADS, or even electrical separation. Or of course by getting the Ra low enough to not require RCD

 

[Leesparkykent]

Just in city's at the mo and flicking through the PE magazine and napit have just written an article on this and says the rcd must be located at the inverter end. Page 37 of Febs PE magazine if any ones interested.

 

[gnselectricals]

Just in city's at the mo and flicking through the PE magazine and napit have just written an article on this and says the rcd must be located at the inverter end. Page 37 of Febs PE magazine if any ones interested.

Off to the salers now will have a look cheers

 

[Worcester]

Just in city's at the mo and flicking through the PE magazine and napit have just written an article on this and says the rcd must be located at the inverter end. Page 37 of Febs PE magazine if any ones interested.

Now we're going to get even more confused lol

 

[GEOFF S]

But then the grid supply would not be disconnected in the event of a fault.
This is a cable with a source of supply at both ends.

Hi

Im not sure i follow, so lets break things down.

We must not connect to final circuits, so 5 Sec rule applys.

If there is no seperation on the inverter or the PV cable a.c requires rcd prorection then this is placed at the inverter.

Unlike a tx the inverter is not connected to the general mass of earth at the star point.

The PV a.c cable needs to be provided with fault protetcion at the connection to the mains a.c.

If a fault occurs on the a.c system, the power will disconnect within 5 secs, the loss of power will shut the inverter down in milliseconds.

If a fault on the PV cable occurs then the RCD at the inverter operates, thus causing loss of power and inverter shuting down.

If we look at ADS and earting the TX is earthed, so contact with live parts and general mass of earth will give rise to a risk of shock, this isnt the case with the inverter.


Cheers