- Reaction score
- 1,207
The point I'm trying to make Julie is that if a homeowner employs me to undertake a PIR it makes no difference to me the reason behind the request. It could be an insurance company request, or the local council for an HMO, or the said new letting law or even just the home owner for peace of mind. In every case the PIR will be the same and the EICR filled out the same.If you follow the 'rules' of the 18th, correct the guidelines for periodic tests say you inspect to the current, and recommend or identify dangers where it departs, but an existing installation doesn't have to be compliant with the current version.
However, the legislation as implemented in the case of tenancies in England, does state that it must be compliant (and therefore not in-line with the usual practice)
It is very likely an oversight and lack of understanding by the mps draughting the legislation, nevertheless if that's what the law states, then it becomes up to the courts to decide what the correct interpretation is.
(Just like any other law, this is what keeps lawyers in business)
This is what protects you in law down the line if things go wrong.