Far enough. However, the rest of his speech just keeps on repeating the same rhetoric about election fraud and the steal etc, and as previously mentioned the tweets beforehand. Enough to inspire the crowd to do what happened IMO.
I do take the point about using terms like 'fight like hell' and its use in general, but whether that was his mens rea or not, that's exactly what happened. Being a man who holds such power or did have, he should of choose his words more carefully.
When I listen to this man, I find his words both arrogant, belittling and offensive. I recall someone posting about how many conflicts previous Presidents had took their country into conflicts, whereas Trump had none. But I wonder how many achievements he's had as a President in comparison?
The speech was heavy on rhetoric and bluster, but nothing that would ordinarily be considered unusual for a politician. I'm not going to claim that some people weren't driven on by his words, but that his words certainly don't come close to incitement of violence.
The contrast with words from many of his political opponents, over the past year, is stark:
Chris Cuomo (CNN Journalist and brother of Democrat Governor of New York) speaking about antifa protesting in NY: "Show
me where it says that protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful?"
Nancy Pelosi speaking at 2020 Democrat National Congress: "
You've got to be ready to throw a punch."
Maxine Waters (democrat representative) addressing a crowd of supporters: "
If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere."
Senator Cory Brooker (democrat) addressing activists: "
Get up in the face of some congress people."
Eric Holder (unsuccessful democrat candidate 2020) addressing supporters: "
When they go low, we kick them. That's what this new democratic party is about."
Madonna Speaking publicly: "
I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the white house."
Robert DeNero speaking about Trump on video to followers: "
I'd like to punch him in the face."
Jonny Depp at public rally: "
When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?"
Kamala Harris during news interview about nationwide protests: "
They're not going to stop.... and nor should they."
Nancy Pelosi (speaker of the house): "
I don't know why there aren't uprisings all over the country."
Senator Tim Kaine (democrat): "
What we've got to do is fight in Congress, fight in the courts, fight in the streets, fight online, fight at the ballot box, and now there's the momentum to be able to do this."
The above quotes could all be considered as direct incitement to (or justification for) violence, but no one seems to be upset by them.
You mention Trump's achievements and that's something that many people refuse to acknowledge. I don't think anyone would deny many of his daft moments, but not starting a single war was unprecedented in recent times. His reigning in of North Korea would have been considered masterful if managed by anyone else. Restoration of diplomatic ties, cordial relations and direct flights between Israel and several middle eastern countries would have been rewarded with a nobel peace prize, again if it had been managed by anyone else - that process is still dividends.
Anyone who thinks that Trump was an unmitigated disaster would do well to pay attention to US foreign policy during the next four years. They'd also do well to watch employment figures in the US, but that will be heavily skewed by the pandemic.
What I'm trying to get at is that Trump wasn't an ideal president, but nor was he evil incarnate. The man bums and blows a bit, but he got stuff done for America and many other countries.
