Buried SWA cable fault finding

[danielz000]

Hi all,

My first post here, thought I'd see if it was possible to get some advice or tips...

Basically, I had a large amount of block paving and large concrete base laid at the far end (25m) of my garden a few months ago. Under this I had 3 core 16mm SWA laid.

(I most definitely can't vouch for the quality of the work done by any of these guys)

More recently me and my brother built a large garage on the concrete base and had an electrician add a new CU in the garage and connect the other end of the SWA to an MCB in the CU in the house.

Today, after about 2 weeks of not having any problems, the RCD in the house tripped out and wouldn't switch back on unless I turned off the MCB to the garage. It's worth noting, it rained fairly heavily last night.

After trying a few different things, I've eventually disconnected the SWA from the CUs at both ends.

I've tested for continuity across all cable/ armour combinations and noticed there's continuity (beeping) when I touch the live and armour.

Is my assumption that someone has damaged the cable, breaking the live wire insulation and water has entered this and created a circuit between the live and the armour a reasonable one? Are there any other ways this continuity could occur given both ends are now fully disconnected?

Assuming this assumption is correct, I'm curious if there's a simple way for me to locate this fault without digging up 30m of block paving?

For example, I was wondering if, by using a multimeter and testing the resistance across the live and armour at both ends I might be able to work out how far down the wire the break is?

So maybe if I got a resistance 10 times higher at one end than the other I can assume the damage to the 25m long cable is 10% (2.5m) from the end of the cable with lower reading?

I guess I don't need to be super accurate and that there are industrial tools that could accurately locate the fault, all I really want to know is roughly were to start digging in the hope of keeping the damage to the paving to a minimum.

Thanks in advance for any help or suggestions.

Dan

 

[James]

Yes, a difference in resistance measured from each end should give you a rough place to start digging

 

[littlespark]

What were all the readings between cores and between cores and armour?
and end to end continuity of each core?

as it’s a 3 core, you could swap the colours and use the shorting out core as earth.

That’s only possible if only one core is damaged. And it’s not a long term solution as any moisture will eventually rot the armour away.

 

[telectrix]

if the resistance is low enough to cause a multimeter to beep, then it's not water ingress. youneed accurate readings between each core and armour.luckily itmayonly be 1 core affected so littlespark's idea of a temp. fix could be a winner.

 

[littlespark]

Even if you work out how far from each end it is, and unless you know for sure it’s in a straight line and not wiggling all over the place…. You might still end up digging a 6ft wide hole looking for it.

Advise getting a professional with proper test equipment to check it. Your multimeter may not be picking up slight damage to a second core which would scupper my suggestion above.

multimeters give out roughly 9v…. Professional gear- up to 1000v

 

[DPG]

What were all the readings between cores and between cores and armour?
and end to end continuity of each core?

as it’s a 3 core, you could swap the colours and use the shorting out core as earth.

That’s only possible if only one core is damaged. And it’s not a long term solution as any moisture will eventually rot the armour away.

If the cable has been damaged enough to short a core to the armour then surely it needs digging up and a repair made to it.

 

[telectrix]

a vote in favour of putting it in ducting, methinks.

 

[Intoelectrics]

This is one of those situations where I'd have installed the cable in a duct. So many times I've come across this where the cable is installed under ground that has been landscaped or an hard standing added.

a vote in favour of putting it in ducting, methinks.

I was just writing a post stating exactly this! :-

In my experience a cable laid underground that will become inaccessible (under hard finished surfaces) should be ducted. This solves a couple of problems (provide the duct doesn't get damaged and is installed correctly) 1. if the cable gets damaged it can be drawn out and replaced. 2. If the building that is being supplied requires a supply upgrade either an additional cable can be added, or the original drawn and replaced.

 

[7029 dave]

You need to do an insulation resistance test on the SWA, with an IR tester.

 

[timhoward]

The OP has the right idea about measuring resistances from each end. Most of the expense is finding these faults. A left of field suggestion would be to acquire an insulation resistance (IR) tester, eBay always has lots of them as sparks ditch their separate testers and get all in one units. A megger bm403 or similar would be fairly cheap and very helpful in this situation.

 

[ruston]

As the posts above , get the people in with the gear to find it. The cost will be compensated by the time you waste and end up having to get help anyway.

 

[timhoward]

Quick further thought - if recently installed it will be metal boxes both ends. To ask an obvious question, are you sure the live isn't simply resting on the box the end you aren't testing, with the SWA still glanded to the case and providing the continuity you are seeing? If so this might be a red herring.
I'd be looking first and foremost where the cable leaves the house and enters the garage - are there any joint boxes there that have water ingress.
Obviously if you completely removed the SWA, including glands both ends then this isn't a valid thought.

 

[Intoelectrics]

Quick further thought - if recently installed it will be metal boxes both ends. To ask an obvious question, are you sure the live isn't simply resting on the box the end you aren't testing, with the SWA still glanded to the case and providing the continuity you are seeing? If so this might be a red herring.
I'd be looking first and foremost where the cable leaves the house and enters the garage - are there any joint boxes there that have water ingress.
Obviously if you completely removed the SWA, including glands both ends then this isn't a valid thought.

Absolutely, you have got to completely rule out all the obvious and exposed parts first, else it could end up an unnecessary expensive repair.

 

[danielz000]

What were all the readings between cores and between cores and armour?
and end to end continuity of each core?

as it’s a 3 core, you could swap the colours and use the shorting out core as earth.

That’s only possible if only one core is damaged. And it’s not a long term solution as any moisture will eventually rot the armour away.

Thanks! Swapping cores isn't something I thought about. I believe my earth and neutral are in good condition so that might work!

Edit: I haven't checked continuity end to end as the multimeter won't reach the far. I can try connecting the other ends and doubling back though. I haven't tried resistance yet but will do asap.

 

[danielz000]

Guys loads of replies. Thank you so much. I'm going to read through them all now.

 

[danielz000]

Even if you work out how far from each end it is, and unless you know for sure it’s in a straight line and not wiggling all over the place…. You might still end up digging a 6ft wide hole looking for it.

Advise getting a professional with proper test equipment to check it. Your multimeter may not be picking up slight damage to a second core which would scupper my suggestion above.

multimeters give out roughly 9v…. Professional gear- up to 1000v

Thanks mate, I'll look about for a professional but a brief search last night didn't pick anything up. I know the exact root and depth of the cable.

 

[littlespark]

Thanks! Swapping cores isn't something I thought about. I believe my earth and neutral are in good condition so that might work!

As my further post said…. Get the cable checked by a professional with the right test equipment. There may be further damage to the cable that you’re multimeter isn’t detecting.

Make sure you identify the cables properly at each end… not just a little flag of tape that could fall off.
Might surprise a future electrician finding a brown core on the earth bar

 

[DPG]

Thanks! Swapping cores isn't something I thought about. I believe my earth and neutral are in good condition so that might work!

Edit: I haven't checked continuity end to end as the multimeter won't reach the far. I can try connecting the other ends and doubling back though. I haven't tried resistance yet but will do asap.

You definitely need to IR test the cable and see what the damage is. The other cores may be damaged also.

 

[danielz000]

Thanks everyone.

It's a long story, but in regards to the ducting, these builders were absolutely ripping the arse out of it on day rate. In the end I got so frustrated I just had to settle with a number of things I wasn't happy with including the lack of ducting.

In regards to a second hand Megger I'll look in to that if I can't find an electrician smart enough to do it.

Out of curiosity though, how would an insulation resistance test work and would it help me locate the break? Or just confirm the damage exists?

Thanks again little spark, swapping the cores isn't ideal and a repair was my favoured option but swapping cores might be a good temporary fix!

 

[DPG]

Thanks everyone.

It's a long story, but in regards to the ducting, these builders were absolutely ripping the arse out of it on day rate. In the end I got so frustrated I just had to settle with a number of things I wasn't happy with including the lack of ducting.

In regards to a second hand Megger I'll look in to that if I can't find an electrician smart enough to do it.

Out of curiosity though, how would an insulation resistance test work and would it help me locate the break? Or just confirm the damage exists?

Thanks again little spark, swapping the cores isn't ideal and a repair was my favoured option but swapping cores might be a good temporary fix!

I'd be getting the builders back and getting some of the original bill refunded. . The repair to this cable is going to cost you money - it will almost certainly need an electrician.

 

[timhoward]

Out of curiosity though, how would an insulation resistance test work and would it help me locate the break? Or just confirm the damage exists?

It's exactly the same concept as a resistance test with a multi-meter, it just uses 500v dc not (probably) 9v. It can be thought of as a pressure test to confirm the condition of the cable and effectiveness of the insulation between the cores / armour. Any sparks worth their salt would do this test before considering re-energising the circuit. (you obviously aren't anywhere near that stage yet)
As Tel said if you were indeed measuring the actual fault with a multi-meter then it's a very low resistance fault indeed. An IR+continuity test device (most Megger BM devices do both) can measure resistance very accurately (to roughly hundredth of an ohm), much more accurately than most low-mid range multimeters where the good ones do +- 0.2 ohms.
So it would help confirm the cable's integrity and (best case) gain an idea where the issue is.
I do expect you to need a sparks at some point. It would be nice if you can find where the issue is though.

 

[marconi]

Could I confirm/ask some things please?

1. 3 core swa in one length?

2a. As far as you can tell with your multimeter the only continuity/contact is between one core and the steel wire armouring?

2b. There is continuity end-to-end on each core and for the SWA?

3. Please send me a photo of your multimeter.

4. Please draw me a plan of the garden, garage, CUs, cable route and tell me whether you can put your car in the garage - I'd need access to the car's 12V battery.

What is the first half of your post code?

 

[Lucien Nunes]

Testing with a multimeter and/or an insulation tester cannot easily locate the damage. The plan of measuring resistance to the fault from each end doesn't always work because the end-end resistance of the cable is usually so much lower than that of the fault. It could be like trying to locate a pinhole in the channel tunnel by filling the tunnel full of water first from the English end and then from the French end, and comparing how fast the water flows in.

There are two standard methods to locate a fault. One does use the resistance of the conductor from each end to the fault, but in a balanced bridge configuration that is very sensitive and largely independent of the resistance at the fault. This type of Murray or Varley loop test can be done with a dedicated test instrument, or one can rig up a method using a reasonably high current source, some resistors and a multimeter. I think this is what Marconi is hinting at.

The other method is Time Domain Reflectometry, which injects a pulse into the cable and measures the time taken for it to be reflected by any features along its length (including the fault) that alter its impedance. Again it is normally done with a dedicated test instrument.

 

[timhoward]

I’m learning a lot tonight. So it seems the principle of both Murray and Varley loop tests are that when the middle of a Wheatstone bridge measures zero volts you know the ratios of the two pairs of resistors are equal, so if three of the values are known the fourth can be calculated.

It would seem that whichever of the two tests are used one would need a voltage source, two known resistance values and a variable resistor to balance the bridge. I’m particularly fascinated how @marconi was going to improvise the variable resistor

 

[pc1966]

I think this is the method that @marconi and @Lucien Nunes are discussing:

Here the 3 conductors are joined at one end. One of the "good" conductors is used to feed a high-ish test current (say 5A from car battery & 60W lamp), the 2nd is used as a Kelvin connection to sense the voltage at the far end of the faulty 3rd conductor, and then the two voltages are measured:

• V1 = drop from both R1 and R2 at I test
• V2 = voltage across R1 due to the test seen by the fault to armour

You need enough current to get a measurable voltage, and you want it to be above the mV sort of point to avoid thermoelectric offsets.

Then the distance ratio = resistance ratio allows you to guess the R1 length as a fraction of total length (R1 + R2) from V2/V1

 

[pc1966]

Probably should have though this through and made the resistor numbers and voltage numbers a little more consistent!

 

[timhoward]

Well that’s certainly a bit easier than figuring this out…!

I’d got as far as A and B being equal,
y adjusted so G is zero, meaning….
A/B=R/(X+y)
A/B is 1 so R=X+y or X=R-y
y is known.
That leaves half of a pair of simultaneous equations and I gave up and opened the 1664 at that point. I’ll return to this one day…

 

[Markyd]

Brilliant vid

 

[danielz000]

Hi guys,

Thanks again for all the responses! I'll watch that you tube video and read through them diagrams shortly.

Marconi, thanks for your offer. In short, last night my brother randomly decided he knew where the damage was and so pulled up a load of blocks and exposed the cable (it wasn't where he thought obviously).

Today we agreed to just chop the cable in half where it was exposed and test the two halves (removing half the block paving is a lot easier than all of it right...)

Turns out the problem is at the house end.

I'm totally curious as to how someone with the know how and tools would solve the riddle so have answered your questions below. Out of curiosity, can you see my location? Are you local to Romford/Essex?

1. Yes, it WAS 3 core and 1 complete length (about 25 meters)

2a. Yes, there was only continuity between live and the armour.

2b. Yes, I believe so for 2 reasons, 1, the circuit was working for 2 weeks and no digging occurred in that time and, 2, we connected different pairs up at one end and checked continuity along them at the other (the leads don't reach across the garden so that was the only was to do it).

3. LAP AC/DC Digital Multimeter 600V - https://www.NoLinkingToThis/p/lap-ac-dc-digital-multimeter-600v/161fg that's the multimeter I got but when I tried to measure resistance across the live and armour it just read "ERR". Nothing in the manual about how or why that can happen...

4. The car battery could get directly on top of the wire at the house end and within about 6 foot of the CU at the garage end. I've attached an image of my garden before all the work was carried out. It's basically 2 meters of exposed swa cable at both ends with the garage end running under 5m of concrete slab and then under about 15m of block paving before before rising above ground on the outside wall of where the CU is inside the house.

Thanks again all!

Dan

 

[pc1966]

Well that’s certainly a bit easier than figuring this out…!

I would prefer to to have any significant current going via the fault as we don't know its exact resistance, other than "low".

However, that is something else to check to make sure the resistance of good and faulty conductors is more or less the same, in case there is a chunk of copper blown off it where the fault originally tripped. In my drawing you could also measure a 3rd voltage from conductors 1 & 2 at the sending end - that should be more or less identical to the voltage V1 between 2 & 3 as they should be the same R for #1 (good) and #3 (faulty) under normal circumstances.

 

[timhoward]

That leaves half of a pair of simultaneous equations and I gave up and opened the 1664 at that point. I’ll return to this one day…

To answer my own question in case anyone searches the forum for varley loop test in future…
The 2nd equation is derived from twice the resistance of a length of one conductor being equal R+X+y. Substituting that in leaves a ratio of resistance X to resistance of the total loop. I think.
I might try this and @pc1966 method out when I have time just for fun.

 

[Jim_e_Jib]

Deleted - misread post!

 

[marconi]

danielz000 - I am no more than 20 minutes drive from you. Do you want me to call in? If the method my colleagues have explained does not work on the damaged 25m length I will improvise a time domain reflectometer and use it during a second visit.

If he was my brother he would have been given an Essex smack for not waiting for some testing to be done ;-)

We will pass circa 50 Amps through the cable in order to produce a volt drop of the order 50 x rho = 50 x 0.00183 Ohm/A/m = 50 x 0.002 = 0.1 V per m or 25 x 0.1 = 2.5V over the length of the 25m cable. May even use an even larger current briefly.

Shall I buy the necessary items or do you want me to guide you through what you need and how to do it yourself? For safety's sake is the house end of the cable removed from the CU so that you would not be working near anything live?

 

[littlespark]

And was the fault actually under the blocks or concrete? Did you do a load of digging for nothing?

 

[DPG]

danielz000 - I am no more than 20 minutes drive from you. Do you want me to call in? If the method my colleagues have explained does not work on the damaged 25m length I will improvise a time domain reflectometer and use it during a second visit.

If he was my brother he would have been given an Essex smack for not waiting for some testing to be done ;-)

We will pass circa 50 Amps through the cable in order to produce a volt drop of the order 50 x rho = 50 x 0.00183 Ohm/A/m = 50 x 0.002 = 0.1 V per m or 25 x 0.1 = 2.5V over the length of the 25m cable. May even use an even larger current briefly.

Shall I buy the necessary items or do you want me to guide you through what you need and how to do it yourself? For safety's sake is the house end of the cable removed from the CU so that you would not be working near anything live?

The usual knowledge and helpfulness from Marconi, mixed in with a slight hint of violence ?

Be interested to see how this works out.

 

[littlespark]

“Hi, brother…. This is the guy I met on the internet that says you’re a prat”

 

[pc1966]

To answer my own question in case anyone searches the forum for varley loop test in future…
The 2nd equation is derived from twice the resistance of a length of one conductor being equal R+X+y. Substituting that in leaves a ratio of resistance X to resistance of the total loop. I think.
I might try this and @pc1966 method out when I have time just for fun.

My concerns with the Varley Loop / Murry loop sort of tests here is the need for high current / low resistance adjustments. With ~25m of 16mm copper the total resistance of each conductor is of the order of 0.03ohms and you will struggle to find rheostats of that sort of value and ~10A rating just sitting around.

My approach is really a "Wheatstone Bridge" arrangement but instead of using the other arms to null (zero) a galvanometer, today we just use a decent DMM that will be > 1M impedance so can be ignored and if 1mV resolution for the meter we can get a meaningful reading / distance resolution with only a 100mV or so total volt drop. The balancing arm ratio then becomes maths on the two measured voltages.

So then test currents of the order of 5A are feasible and sustainable without worrying too much about how to get that much current (mid-size laboratory PSU, car battery with some current-limiting load like a 60W bulb, etc).

 

[pc1966]

3. LAP AC/DC Digital Multimeter 600V - https://www.NoLinkingToThis/p/lap-ac-dc-digital-multimeter-600v/161fg that's the multimeter I got but when I tried to measure resistance across the live and armour it just read "ERR". Nothing in the manual about how or why that can happen...

The Screwfix site lacks detailed specifications, such as the voltage ranges/resolutions supported. At least it is CAT-II rated, but that is not quite enough if measuring at the CU (instead of at the appliance after 13A fuse, etc) See:

Measurement category - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The usual reason for getting an error when attempting to measure resistance is it is seeing some residual voltage there. It could be the fault is intermittent so only manifesting at higher test voltages so it is picking up capacitively coupled voltages, or it could be there is a small AC voltage of the order of 0.1V or so induced from some other energised circuit or current flowing back via earthed metalwork in the garage, etc.

As general advice, always check for voltage before you measure for resistance! Multimeters are not considered safe for "proving dead" as there are so many ways you can get it wrong, possibly resulting in a fatal shock if you failed to detect high voltages, or an inadequately rated meter exploding if subject to a very high energy fault.

That is what the likes of GS38 health & safety advice call for the use of a dedicated voltage tester, along with some means of proving it is working before and after you checked for the presence of high voltages. This is the sort of thing you would be looking at for a low budget:

https://www.NoLinkingToThis/p/lap-ms8922b-ac-dc-2-pole-voltage-tester-with-rcd-400v/669hy

The proving units are significantly more expensive (in the £70++ range) but for occasional use you can check it works on a circuit you did not switch off before/after you test one you plan on working on.

4299 Proving Unit

Intelligent voltage ramp testing for voltage indicators and multimeters

www.cef.co.uk

 

[HappyHippyDad]

@danielz000 if marconi is offering to come and help, I would jump at the chance. His Knowledge is vast. You may not understand a 100% of what he is explaining to you though ?.

Ps.. I love @Lucien Nunes explanation of why a standard resistance test from each end may well not work! (i.e pin hole and filling channel tunnel). Really helps you see the problem, especially when you cannot understand all of the physics involved.

 

[pc1966]

If he was my brother he would have been given an Essex smack for not waiting for some testing to be done ;-)

THIS !!!

Though quite why you would give him a twin-foresail fishing boat is a bit of a mystery:

Betty CK145 History of the Essex-smack

Essex oyster smack Betty CK145 homepage

www.betty-ck145.com

 

[nicebutdim]

@danielz000 if marconi is offering to come and help, I would jump at the chance. His Knowledge is vast. You may not understand a 100% of what he is explaining to you though ?.

Ps.. I love @Lucien Nunes explanation of why a standard resistance test from each end may well not work! (i.e pin hole and filling channel tunnel). Really helps you see the problem, especially when you cannot understand all of the physics involved.

I might understand somewhere in the region of 5% on a good day (plenty of sleep and a decent meal the night before).

Hopefully the OP jumps at this chance and then reports back here on the experience.

 

[johntheo]

I might understand somewhere in the region of 5% on a good day (plenty of sleep and a decent meal the night before).

Hopefully the OP jumps at this chance and then reports back here on the experience.

If I'm interpreting it correctly the voltage drop (across R1+R2) is measured between the two ends of the faulty cable and then between one end of the faulty cable and the armour (just R1), one of the healthy cables is just being utilized as a 25 meter M.meter lead for the first reading. Not quite sure about the right calcs but assuming that the fault is say only 5 meters from the joined ends then the volt drop across RI might be V1x20/25. Would love to see actual test readings from this method.

 

[marconi]

If I'm interpreting it correctly the voltage drop (across R1+R2) is measured between the two ends of the faulty cable and then between one end of the faulty cable and the armour (just R1), one of the healthy cables is just being utilized as a 25 meter M.meter lead for the first reading. Not quite sure about the right calcs but assuming that the fault is say only 5 meters from the joined ends then the volt drop across RI might be V1x20/25. Would love to see actual test readings from this method.

I will do you a demo. All a bit academic now cos two joins underground not great future for this run of swa cable- one maybe tolerable but two …,…

 

[UNG]

All a bit academic now but was there any tests done before the cable was put into service / buried to check it's integrity

 

[freddo]

I must have a go at that Varley test. I have a fault on a 4 core swa , 2 cores low resistance to each other and to earth. Would be cool to find the location of the fault, though most of the cable is now under a building extension. I do have a 20A variable PSU and some big resistors and power variable resistors

 

[pc1966]

If I'm interpreting it correctly the voltage drop (across R1+R2) is measured between the two ends of the faulty cable and then between one end of the faulty cable and the armour (just R1), one of the healthy cables is just being utilized as a 25 meter M.meter lead for the first reading. Not quite sure about the right calcs but assuming that the fault is say only 5 meters from the joined ends then the volt drop across RI might be V1x20/25. Would love to see actual test readings from this method.

Most of the methods are doing this - establishing the resistance either side of the fault to armour. The different methods really come down to available test equipment, etc, and some minor variations in accuracy for a given assumption of test equipment, simil;arity of available 2nd conductors, etc.

One method mentioned that is not doing that is time-domain reflectometry (TDR) where a pulse is sent down the cable and where it encounters a change of characteristic some of it is reflected back. By measuring the time taken for this first reflection (you get another large one when the pulse reaches the far end) you can estimate the distance to the fault either directly (using the known velocity factor for the insulation) or by ration (from known length and far-end delay).

This is commonly used in RF systems but often indirectly (not a pulse, but maths performed on a swept-frequency reflection measurement), and in fibre optics using a laser pulse. Whereas in power systems they originally used the closing and then fault-triggered reopening of the supply breaker to generate the surge, though probably these days it is a safer low energy plust that is used!

 

[pc1966]

I must have a go at that Varley test. I have a fault on a 4 core swa , 2 cores low resistance to each other and to earth. Would be cool to find the location of the fault, though most of the cable is now under a building extension. I do have a 20A variable PSU and some big resistors and power variable resistors

Let us know how you get on with the different methods, would be good to have some hands-on experience of how easy each/any of them were.

 

[pc1966]

Overall though the underlying problem was most likely poor workmanship.

While you can bury SWA directly in the ground it should have sand or similar around it for several cm to make sure that sharp stones are not crushing the armour - there is always a limit to what it can take! Though it is just possible that very bad handling of the cable might have caused internal damage.

As others have also said, putting in duct is better for many reasons, though it also should have sand or very fine gravel surrounding it for the same physical protection reasons. The big advantages are: less likely cable damage, the ability (if sane length and route) to pull through a fault cable and bring its replacement in, and also to allow other cables if needed (say network for internet, etc).

Finally it should have been properly tested after initial burial and before final work over that area. And that means a proper high-voltage insulation check as well as the typical conductor / armour resistance chances you would do to verify any new circuit.

 

[marconi]

I must have a go at that Varley test. I have a fault on a 4 core swa , 2 cores low resistance to each other and to earth. Would be cool to find the location of the fault, though most of the cable is now under a building extension. I do have a 20A variable PSU and some big resistors and power variable resistors

I do not have a long length of swa with which to do a realistic demo using a high current. How about me sending you my test rig - the parts for which are on order and due today - and then you use it on your defective length of swa cable and see how it performs in practice? You can keep it afterwards.

What is the csa and length of your cable?

 

[freddo]

Yes I would be interested in playing with your bits! The CSA is 25mm2 length ~40M. Someone with some modern test gear was going to take a look last week but couldnt make it. I ended up retesting the 2 undamaged cores at 2500V today to prove they were still ok, got greater than 2500Mohm in all directions once I had cleaned the exposed insulation in the cabinet outside, as needed to get a reduced supply back on feeding half of the lighting. The fault is between yellow and red phases and armour today it measures around 100ohms on a continuity test. The 2 damaged cores are now extra cpcs. As most of the cable route is now built on it is likely a new route will have to be dug soon. A ground working company are looking in next week.