Damaging a trial is technically contempt of court mate.
No, read the article again!
It only revelas what exactly has been said in court, which is now public knowledge. It does not speculate and it does not offer an opinion!
Offering an opinion can potentially interfere with legal proceedings, especially when members of a jury are influenced by that opinion, and in such cases a trial will be brought to an end on that basis and there will be no sentencing.
In other words, the two fellas walk if the court find out that the jury have been influenced by anything other than facts presented in court.
We should not be discussing this