OP
pauldreed
--- It's because it's dark!PV is dead. RIP PV :- (
Discuss Immersion Heater - PV electricity in the Central Heating Systems area at ElectriciansForums.net
--- It's because it's dark!PV is dead. RIP PV :- (
Hi, Ive been dircted to this thread from a discussion on the PV forum and have spent hours sifting through all the pages and some very interesting idea. I'm a little confused about your CT's and wondered if could you elaborate a bit on how everything is connected in your system. Do you simply have one CU with PV fed in via RCBO and immersion fed from MCB or is the immersion feed separated off from the CU. I've been trying to work out what the result is from your CT set up with up one on PV+Incoming and another on the PV?
I've currently got everything connected into the CU so have thought of putting a CT around all the house circuits (excluding immersion) and another on the PV thereby enabling me to calculate the excess power or maybe adding a Henley block to my set up to keep everything separate but is your method a cunning way to get round all that?
Its probably all very simple but its late and my brains dead
Cheers
John
Hi Guys
I am going to have an extra long immersion heater made. 3 KW but 48 '' long. The majority of heat will be biased at the lower end. As some of us are now getting free hot water it makes sense to try and use the whole tank. If anybody else is interested in one let me know because the more they make in one go the cheaper it will be for all of us. I have asked for a quote for one and five units to see what the difference is. It must be better than drilling into the side of the tank and risking damaging the whole thing.
I have just changed mine from a 27 to a 36 and only just got away with it beacuse it goes in at a slight angle. 48 would hit the boiler coil. An immersion coil where the heat is applied lower down would be of great interest.
Good idea....I like your lateral thinking....Rather than using an extra long immersion, have you considered using a pump to simply circulate the water around the cylinder, T off from the H/W outlet at the top of the cylinder and route via a pump and a non return valve down to the C/W input at the bottom of the cylinder, switch the pump on whenever there is enough excess PV power to run the pump and immersion.
Rather than using an extra long immersion, have you considered using a pump to simply circulate the water around the cylinder, T off from the H/W outlet at the top of the cylinder and route via a pump and a non return valve down to the C/W input at the bottom of the cylinder, switch the pump on whenever there is enough excess PV power to run the pump and immersion.
Excellent idea
probably a good idea to have a non return valve in the C/W input as well to prevent possiblity of pushing hot water into the cold system.
Rather than using an extra long immersion, have you considered using a pump to simply circulate the water around the cylinder, T off from the H/W outlet at the top of the cylinder and route via a pump and a non return valve down to the C/W input at the bottom of the cylinder, switch the pump on whenever there is enough excess PV power to run the pump and immersion.
Hi well done for the abstract thought. I have just had the quote. £150 + vat for 48'' with 6'' dead zone. Hmm quite a lot really. The pump would need to be controlled carefully so that you didn't disperse useable heat if it was a low pv day.
How would that work?There's actually no head to overcome - just a minute difference in pressure caused by the difference in water density. An alternative would be to have a short piece of large diameter tube from the bottom of the element to the bottom of the tank, which would result in the water from the bottom being drawn up, but that isn't controllable.
I don't know if different 'power' pumps are available, but I would think it would only need a low flow rate to effectively circulate the water as there is only about a metre head of water and short pipe runs.
If there is any temperature gradient in the water inside the top of the tube where the bottom of the element is placed, it will move and draw water up from the bottom of the tank.How would that work?
Wouldn't the water temp in the tube vary between the tank temp at the top, and cold at the bottom (same as the tank) and remain motionless in tandem with the tank?
I've actually seen a circulation pump used in a large house where there was effectively a h/w ring main around the house so the H/W was pumped around the ring and back to the bottom of the cylinder so didn't have to wait for hot water at any of the taps or showers regardless of how far they were away from the cylinder. Obviously this required copious quantities of pipe lagging but very effective.
I had a 1975 bungalow like that but the pipes were set into the concrete floor with probably no lagging so it had been disconnected by previous owner as not efficient. There was a standard CH type pump to pump it round.
Regarding the deadness of PV due to proposed FIT change can I encourage you to protest to relevant people as government is allegedly open for consultation. Chances are it won't kill the industry but slow it down a lot. As PV prices fall its likely that in 2-4 years the new FIT level will again return more than 5%. But they could reduce FIT further by then.
The December cut off is very unfair as many people have spent significant money on the planning process and now can’t get it installed in time to reap the full benefits, even if they have just got to the end of the porocess.
Governments of all hues have blighted the low carbon industries by stop start grant/subsidy policies.
Reply to Immersion Heater - PV electricity in the Central Heating Systems area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.