Search for tools and product advice,

Discuss Immersion Heater - PV electricity in the Central Heating Systems area at ElectriciansForums.net

I have been using the Triac 10PCV2425 from Crydom. It has a built in snubber and comes as a complete package. I have been using it to run two immersion heaters. When the first is up to temperature I switch a contactor and bring in the second tank. I have just bolted it to the side of a metal case with a small copper shim and a small thin heat sink from a pc. At the very worst time I have only ever felt a very small rise in temperature so I can honestly say that heat is not a problem, and I have been working it hard from just a couple of watts right up to 3 kw continuously throughout the day. The discussed interference has not manifested it's self in any way and I don't think that it is a problem. I am sure that the Emma box uses the same off the shelf component and seem to not employ any extra supression.
 
Looking at the relative phase of current and voltage gives you the direction of power flow, e.g. if the current waveform is positive while the voltage is negative, power is flowing in one direction; if the current is negative while the voltage is negative, it's the other. In practice it's a bit more complicated because of power factor so you integrate over a cycle (take many rapid samples of voltage and current, multiply them together, and add the results) to work out the net power flow.

I don't have any references; I might be talking rubbish :) But there is a lot of stuff out there: I found this:

"The general requirement in IEC 1000-3-2 prohibits power control systems that generate low-frequency harmonics. Specifically, systems that generate switching operations less than or equal to 40 times in a half cycle are prohibited in the control of power supplied to heating elements and thermal devices. This relates to equipment that has power current control in the form of SCRs."

And look inside a dimmer pack to see how much ironmongery it contains. As for power dissipation from a triac, well they drop a volt or so which is 13W at 13A RMS.
 
And look inside a dimmer pack to see how much ironmongery it contains. As for power dissipation from a triac, well they drop a volt or so which is 13W at 13A RMS.
It good to be back to design, patents were a bit boring.
I think that the max voltage drop is at peak voltage and when on. AC is 240V RMS of course so it won't be 13W. Too late to do the maths.
The regulation you quote is interesting. So we need to switch faster than 40 times in a half cycle. That's easily achieved. You trigger on the zero crossing and then fire a (hardware) PWM stream at the duty cycle you need. A little maths to figure out the various pulse stream duty cycles required for a given % power but a small lookup table on the microcontroller would do it. Say you have to switch at >10,000 times within the half cycle, you are still talking of 0.5MHz which should be straight forwards with a PIC or whatever.

inie,
Thanks for reminding us of the Triac 10PCV2425, which proves that phase control is possible for $100 or less.
Does the Crydom switch rapidly within the cycle for a given demand? I would be a little wary of trying to switch the Crydom rapidly as it has an analogue input.
Apart from snubber (which protects against false firing?) do you know if the Crydom has any EMC filtering?
The reason is that the Crydom is still expensive. If this is to be done then best done with a few £ of SCRs built from the ground up rather than a $100 package. Convinient package granted.
 
I think the dissipation is still 13W, or think of it this way: if you've got a heater dissipating 3kW on 240V that's 12.5W per volt. You could put 240 resistors in series, each dropping a volt, and each would dissipate 12.5W. A triac dropping a volt would do the same thing; in fact it would dissipate more because it is non-linear so will drop a volt over nearly the whole cycle. Yes, it will only do this at full pelt but if you want to be able to drive the heater continuously at high power you will need to provide heatsinking accordingly (the hot water cylinder being an obvious choice).

inie: I think I've already said that the snubber network is not an interference suppression system; it merely prevents false firing of the triac and has no effect on poor power factor and I would suggest little on electromagnetic interference. If it were adequate, you wouldn't have to fill dimmer packs with expensive inductors. I've definitely said that just because you haven't experienced interference doesn't mean that it is not being generated. Those solid-state relays/phase angle controllers do not have interference suppression or power factor correction.

If I ever get round to building such a thing I can see myself going for something based on an Arduino microcontroller as discussed on the openenergymonitor site as well as here. I don't see why this shouldn't be able to calculate the grid current (and power direction) over one cycle and provide the firing pulses for an opto-isolated triac (about £5) for the next cycle. Only one current transformer needed, on a meter tail. This could not be made into a commercial product though.
 
Yes the hot water tank would be a good heatsink, except when hot! The Crydom operates to 80C and I guess the tank goes to 60C+.
13W would be a fair sized heat sink passively cooled in an airing cupboard, say two hands surface area.
Best to add a thermal trip as well, too easy not too.
Still not sure that the 13W is right, if you look you can find an Rds of 0.03, which is around 5W, say the BT139. Bet you could go lower. Isn't some of the V drop junction effect and so is not lost power?

The Arbuino is a good choice, lots of support and worked examples which is what you need. A PIC may be a couple of £ cheaper. Lots of choice though. I'd go with the brand that has the most/best examples similar to what you're doing. The PIC has a PFC example circuit for example.

Why do you not think that you could make the discussed design as a commercial product?
I am sure that I have delivered worse than that before ;)
I cannot see anything too hard here. Also I have seen products which switch 3KW @£80 or so, they may ignore the rules and just stamp CE, but I hope that its shows all is solveable.
 
The hot water cylinder should be OK especially if you only put a triac there rather than everything else (such as electrolytic capacitors). You'd attach it at the bottom which would probably remain relatively cold. Difficult to ensure good thermal contact to a curved surface though. If the regulation I quoted applies, you would not be able to use an SCR/Triac to control your immersion heater; you'd have to use a gate turn-off device or a MOSFET which could switch more rapidly than twice a cycle. If you could point me at one of these commercial heater controllers I'd be interested to look. Perhaps they use burst firing, which wouldn't fool an electricity meter (although that reg implies that burst firing isn't allowed either).
 
First hit for BT139 brings up a data sheet which has a clear graph showing power dissipation for various phase angles. It agrees with what I said: worst case (full tilt) about 17W at 13A, and still nearly 10W at 30 degrees conduction angle. These devices might have a resistance figure but this is additional to the non-linear fixed voltage drop; both factors cause heat dissipation. This is why plug-in timers use relays.
 
Oops, you're right of course.
I did not check & assumed that power loss was all Rds.
Is this the case with all semis? Worked on a high efficiency DC project once where it seemed that all the hardware ppl could think about was Rds.

Yes a triac would only fire until zero current (the remaing phase) so MOSFET or similar would be need, if the standard applies.
You say burst firing is not allowed, do you mean burst firing in the sense of zero firing where you miss so many cycles?
I was expecting to burst within the half wave as suggested by your quote, using a MOSFET etc.

I don't have links to the commercial product, it was a studio lighting controller, think the brand was Evans. I will see if I can find again.

Anyway, what do you think prevents you from making a product?
You certainly can pick me up quickly on my mistakes & lazyness!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rds presumably means resistance drain to source, which is for MOSFETS, not triacs. That might explain the anomaly! It is indeed very important for those things. My solar inverter wouldn't be able to get 96% efficiency and a reasonable sized heatsink without nice low resistance FETs (I presume - insulated gate bipolar transistors seem to be another fancy semiconductor used in such applications). They don't have this pesky fixed voltage drop and so behave more like resistors.

Yes, I mean firing for a certain number of complete cycles when talking about burst mode.

I wouldn't be interested in jumping through the regulatory hoops to make a commercial product; besides which, I have a day job!
 
Yes it was for a buck/boost intelligent psu.
So using a MOSFET with a low Rds in this application would reduce power loss down to 5W or so?

The link I need to find is for a lighting controller & so I doubt that it was burst/zero firing. Would give the viewers a headache! Also I don't think that it was an autotransformer. Probably wrong on that one though.

Still not sure that you have many hoops to jump through, once designed to meet conditions then a design file for CE and lots of testing?
I have experience of companies where the low voltage regulations have been a mystery to those designing 240V, 440V equipment and their managers. Even worked at one. EMC problems, lets hop frequencies! Not suggesting you go that route but I do wonder how much product truely conforms.
BTW, what field do you work in ?
 
emma circuit diagram shows a filter which appears to be mounted under the cylon controller. the crydom incorporates a PWM controller which switches at a high rate. this is necessary both to comply with the regs and to make sure that the inverter has enough power storage (hold up) to supply the 3kw load even though it might be generating a few watts on average.
 
Thanks for clarifying, pmcalli - explains the Crydom's eye-watering cost, and it would be nice if the data sheet mentioned this (and talked about filtering too). Crydom also needs a low-voltage supply, which is irritating if operating it from a system designed to consume minimum power.

Interesting too about the problems of a spiky load for a solar inverter.

Would love to see the Emma circuit diagram!!

bradburts: I supposedly work in electronics but it's all software nowadays...
 
bradburts: I supposedly work in electronics but it's all software nowadays...
You should ask for a pay rise then ;)

I take it that the cylon controller is the industry standard energy management system (including a lighting controller?) rather than a evil scientist?

Which Crydom range are you refering too?
Did anyone find a FET capable of switching 3KW using AC? I didn't find anything. All I found had Amps dropping off very quickly as rating goes above 80V or so.
I am assuming that there is something (and with a high efficiency) as you can get 240V to 220V convertors fitted to your consummer unit for a few hundred pounds.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks.
Looked again, found loads. Must have been selecting gate voltage! What a numpty.
Lowest Rds was 70mOhm.
You sure that the linked Crydom switches at high frequency? I thought it was just a phase controller?
 
I'm doubting that it can be high frequency, especially when the thermocouple version especially designed for heaters is zero crossing burst firing. pmcalli, which devices did you mean?
 
Sorry, I can't find the full circuit diagram - could you point me to it, please?

In the picture of the SP15 (smallest one) here there is a Kyotto KC2015AX (sadly apparently unavailable retail). This is definitely not a high frequency controller, and there is a nice big filter. (The black lump called Lambda is a DC power supply.)

In the PDF showing the wiring diagram, things are rather different. There is a Crydom 10PCV2440, similar to the Kyotto, but no filter. Unsure what unit this is, but as it's only a 40A controller and doesn't appear to have a heat sink, I assume it's also the smallest.
 
(Posted as suntrap posted)
Checked the website & they show a schematic which is pretty much a circuit diagram as all the components seem to be COTS.
Think the Crydom shown is a 10PCV2440, which is a PFC.
There's a AC filter module. Cannot make it out though.
Any thoughts on what the DIN AC filter module is anyone?
Its clearly not designed for cost. Easy to build a DIN rail system but the components cost a packet.

So meeting regulations cannot be 2 hard if all you need is a COTS filter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah sorry, should have read pmcalli's post properly - yes, the high current wires disappear under the control unit, so presumably there is a filter there. I notice in the wiring diagram that you can't have your PV connected to the existing consumer unit - but then if the consumer unit is going to be full of relays it'll need replacing anyway.
 
Tryed to send a massage to see if you are still suppling your immersion units but get this massage (echase has exceeded their stored private messages quota and cannot accept further messages until they clear some space.)!
 
Ah sorry, should have read pmcalli's post properly - yes, the high current wires disappear under the control unit, so presumably there is a filter there. I notice in the wiring diagram that you can't have your PV connected to the existing consumer unit - but then if the consumer unit is going to be full of relays it'll need replacing anyway.
The emma unit uses a PID function in the cylon controller to balance the outputs of the two CT's which measure the power from the solar panels against the power consumed in the house including the variable load immersion heater. If the PV system is wired into a spare way in the consumer unit they recommend that it is seperated by fitting a henley block and a second consumer unit. This is not stricly necessary as there is a sneaky way to install the CT's without adding a second consumer unit. If you have 16mm2 meter tails then you can clip the CT around both the incoming meter tail and the PV wire. As the meter tail is carrying house load - pv gen putting both wires through the CT results in house load -pv +pv = house load. If you have 25mm2 tails then you may need to buy the bigger CT's.
 
Someone on the openenergymonitor forums gave me that idea until I decided that one CT on the meter tail with a sniff of the voltage to determine the direction of current flow (not to mention give more accurate readings) would be a more elegant solution!
 
Accurate power readings are not necessary in a two ct set up as you are only make two things the same. the control function for this mode is very simple to implement. If you only sense the composite current you are trying to reduce the value to zero. current transformers are very inaccurate a low levels and the function is non trival to implement.
 
Good points, although I was really considering a more sophisticated system based on a microprocessor so that I could log things. Maybe just keep it simple, although it might be difficult to stabilise the loop. It does require the solar feed T&E cable to be split.
 
I moved the RCBO for the solar feed to be next to the main incomer in the cs unit and then put the CT around the the incoming meter tail and the solar feed live which are now right next to each other. second CT just goes around the solar feed live all nicely contained in the CS. My CS is a large MK sentry so there is plenty of room.
I am also thinking of using a micro controller type microprocessor and implement the PID function in code there are plenty of code examples for PID loops. I use them at work regularly and finding the right loop values can be done by a simple set of experiments. I am also looking at using an off the shelf PID controller and the crydom unit some of them take CT inputs directly. An expensive solution but only needs wiring up. I did try to see if i could get hold of the controller emma uses but cylon wouldn't supply details just referred me to their partner integrators
 
emma circuit diagram shows a filter which appears to be mounted under the cylon controller. the crydom incorporates a PWM controller which switches at a high rate. this is necessary both to comply with the regs and to make sure that the inverter has enough power storage (hold up) to supply the 3kw load even though it might be generating a few watts on average.


Hi guys
Just to let you know the 10PCV2425 is not controlled by PWM. It is a triac and as such, as soon as fired will continue to conduct until zero cross over. the EMMA uses this unit and therefore definitely does not use pwm. This has been confirm to me today by an application engineer at Crydom.
 
Good stuff - please keep us posted!

One of the things that baffles me is the apparent lack of heatsink in the EMMA unit. I'd have thought the phase controller would have to dissipate about 15W going full tilt.

Edit: thanks inie meanie - your post crossed mine.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Data sheet I had on the crydom said it incorporated a proportional power control which I incorrectly interpreted as being a PWM. Sorry for the bum steer. I just downloaded the full data sheet from USA site and it doesn't make pleasant reading. voltage drop is specd at 1.6V which I make 20W dissipation at full load. Looking at EMMA pics it appears to be mounted on a DIN rail. The EMMA case looks like it is stainless steel. using the derating curves from the data sheet and some guesswork on the watts per degree C of such a mounting it will run hot but within max temps. This might explain why the EMMA unit has vents in the case top and bottom of the crydom. If it was mounted directly on the metalwork it would run stone cold. Looks like they could do with some lessons on thermal design. I am surprised that the solar inverters have enough hold up to support simple phase control. The data sheet specifies a minimum current of .15 A but the graphs show it going to zero have to assume the .15 minimum means that this is the lowest controllable current and after that it goes straight off meaning lowest usable power control is 36 W not really a problem.
 
Data sheet I had on the crydom said it incorporated a proportional power control which I incorrectly interpreted as being a PWM. Sorry for the bum steer. I just downloaded the full data sheet from USA site and it doesn't make pleasant reading. voltage drop is specd at 1.6V which I make 20W dissipation at full load. Looking at EMMA pics it appears to be mounted on a DIN rail. The EMMA case looks like it is stainless steel. using the derating curves from the data sheet and some guesswork on the watts per degree C of such a mounting it will run hot but within max temps. This might explain why the EMMA unit has vents in the case top and bottom of the crydom. If it was mounted directly on the metalwork it would run stone cold. Looks like they could do with some lessons on thermal design. I am surprised that the solar inverters have enough hold up to support simple phase control. The data sheet specifies a minimum current of .15 A but the graphs show it going to zero have to assume the .15 minimum means that this is the lowest controllable current and after that it goes straight off meaning lowest usable power control is 36 W not really a problem.

I have been using this module and have it bolted to a sealed case with only a slight perceptible rise in temperature. I think the EMMA uses a heat sink on the rear or the triac that then clips to the din rail. I have been driving it hard as I switch between immersion heaters on different tanks automatically via a contactor change over. I have monitored current down to 10 w when the control voltage is 2.4 vdc
 
You can tune a PID using:
https://controls.engin.umich.edu/wiki/index.php/PIDTuningClassical
Usually enough just to have a PI system.
I think that in this case you should be careful how you tune though. I would be more interested in not importing electricity than having a control system which does not oscillate. The sun goes in & your immersion power should drop sharply is more important than slowly integrating to a fine balence.
I would have thought that a simplier control system would be more relevant. Suppose you could use an integral to approach ideal but when the sun goes in the integral will have you importing with a true PID.
Perhaps EMMA use a PID because thats what comes with the DIN rail controller.
Is CT accuracy much of an issue? I would be happy using all but 200W or 100W as a design aim, thats quite a small percentage 'loss' after all. 200W is 1 Amp which should be easy enough to measure?
I have not used CTs before, always used shunts. What range of accuracies would you expect?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You can tune a PID using:
https://controls.engin.umich.edu/wiki/index.php/PIDTuningClassical
Usually enough just to have a PI system.
I think that in this case you should be careful how you tune though. I would be more interested in not importing electricity than having a control system which does not oscillate. The sun goes in & your immersion power should drop sharply is more important than slowly integrating to a fine balence.
I would have thought that a simplier control system would be more relevant. Suppose you could use an integral to approach ideal but when the sun goes in the integral will have you importing with a true PID.
Perhaps EMMA use a PID because thats what comes with the DIN rail controller.
Is CT accuracy much of an issue? I would be happy using all but 200W or 100W as a design aim, thats quite a small percentage 'loss' after all. 200W is 1 Amp which should be easy enough to measure?
I have not used CTs before, always used shunts. What range of accuracies would you expect?

I have calibrated my system which is totally analogue to export slightly all the time. I too did not want any import to be used as I seem to have plenty of available power. The CTs do have a slight curve at the lower end but I have managed to just export 10 or so watts at these points but then I have to export a 100 or so when power is in the 1 to 2 kw range and I was quite happy with that. The control function is only proportional as I would need to go digital to introduce and integral action. I think I will be investigating a digital setup in the future, now I have everything running really well, I can relax a bit. :- )
 
You can tune a PID using:
https://controls.engin.umich.edu/wiki/index.php/PIDTuningClassical
Usually enough just to have a PI system.
I think that in this case you should be careful how you tune though. I would be more interested in not importing electricity than having a control system which does not oscillate. The sun goes in & your immersion power should drop sharply is more important than slowly integrating to a fine balence.
I would have thought that a simplier control system would be more relevant. Suppose you could use an integral to approach ideal but when the sun goes in the integral will have you importing with a true PID.
Perhaps EMMA use a PID because thats what comes with the DIN rail controller.
Is CT accuracy much of an issue? I would be happy using all but 200W or 100W as a design aim, thats quite a small percentage 'loss' after all. 200W is 1 Amp which should be easy enough to measure?
I have not used CTs before, always used shunts. What range of accuracies would you expect?

I agree PI with D set to zero will be fine. if you don't use the I term there will be an error to the set point. This error could be above or below the set point depending on what direction you have aproached from so its important to use the I term even if its set very low to give a rapid response. We do not know if EMMA uses a PID controller its just a guess. the maker of the controller only releases the information to integration partners.
CT's are usually designed for a current range but this can be adjusted by modifying the so called burden resistor ( load ). if the burden resistor is high you get a higher o/p voltage which helps with the low values but it becomes non linear at high currents. For the immersion requirement I would reccomend a high burden value as this gives the resoultion you want at low values. if you are using a ct on both house and pv the high current non linearity is the same for both and so has no effect if you use a PI controller. you need to be careful about o/p voltage at high currents on the house CT and i would suggest that clamp diodes or a zener is used to ensure that the i/p to the controller is not exceeded. the clamp should be fitted for saftey reasons anyway and some CT's have them built in.
 
I have calibrated my system which is totally analogue to export slightly all the time. I too did not want any import to be used as I seem to have plenty of available power. The CTs do have a slight curve at the lower end but I have managed to just export 10 or so watts at these points but then I have to export a 100 or so when power is in the 1 to 2 kw range and I was quite happy with that. The control function is only proportional as I would need to go digital to introduce and integral action. I think I will be investigating a digital setup in the future, now I have everything running really well, I can relax a bit. :- )

You don't need to go digital to introduce the I term. A simple change to your amplifier to put a second order term in with give you a PI loop. If you have used an op amp as the gain element the feedback resistor just needs replacing with resistor+ capacitor so that it acts like and integrator with the slew rate limited by the resistor.
 
I have been using the AT20B10 coils the same as the EMMA, well no point in reinventing the wheel:) The good thing is they give a 0 to 10 vdc output for the specified range. No worries about a peek voltage. A bit more expensive but it makes things very easy. So far the slope I have achieved is so close it's not worth worring about the off set. As stated Integral can cause an over shoot and I dont want any of that :smiley2:
 
More good stuff. pmcalli, have you seen the openenergy monitor forums? A lot of what you say, such as about clamping diodes and burden resistor selection, is discussed there. inie: I presume you're keeping your circuit diagram to yourself. :smiley2:
just had a look very interesting. The only fear I would have with some of the circuits suggested is there is very little protection and no filtering none of them would pass CE. As to circuits I have been experimenting for a while with various options from expensive like the EMMA to cheap using entirely analogue control loop and discrete thyristor. My conclusion based on the prototypes and entry's on this forum is to be lazy and go for the AT20B10/ AT50B10 sensors, crydom phase controller, i/p filter, packaged power supply and an off the shelf PID controller ( not yet selected any suggestions welcome ). This is very expensive but I don't have the hassle of designing and building a pcb. The analogue cts were std stuff. I used precision rectifiers for the ct interface and then a simple type 2 op amp integrator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have been using the AT20B10 coils the same as the EMMA, well no point in reinventing the wheel:) The good thing is they give a 0 to 10 vdc output for the specified range. No worries about a peek voltage. A bit more expensive but it makes things very easy. So far the slope I have achieved is so close it's not worth worring about the off set. As stated Integral can cause an over shoot and I dont want any of that :smiley2:
EMMA uses AT20B10 for the PV sense and AT50B10 for the house sense. these sensors are only rated for continuous overload of 120% so peak voltage is a problem
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have been using the AT20B10 coils the same as the EMMA, well no point in reinventing the wheel:) The good thing is they give a 0 to 10 vdc output for the specified range. No worries about a peek voltage. A bit more expensive but it makes things very easy. So far the slope I have achieved is so close it's not worth worring about the off set. As stated Integral can cause an over shoot and I dont want any of that <img src="http://www.electriciansforums.net/images/smilies/smiley2.gif" alt="" title="Smiley2" smilieid="329" class="inlineimg" border="0">
EMMA uses AT20B10 for the PV sense and AT50B10 for the house sense. these sensors are only rated for continuous overload of 120%
 
Last edited by a moderator:
very little protection and no filtering none of them would pass CE.
Please elaborate. Are you talking about the PFC chopping the AC? The EMMA seems to get by with a PFC and off the shelf filter. What filter would you use?
Otherwise the circuits I have seen have inputs protected with clamps, use opto isolators etc. I see no reasons why they could not meet CE so long as the build design is sensible.

My conclusion based on the prototypes and entry's on this forum is to be lazy and go for the AT20B10/ AT50B10 sensors, crydom phase controller, i/p filter, packaged power supply and an off the shelf PID controller ( not yet selected any suggestions welcome ). This is very expensive but I don't have the hassle of designing and building a pcb. The analogue cts were std stuff. I used precision rectifiers for the ct interface and then a simple type 2 op amp integrator
Agree, being a lazy engineer is usually best.
I would try and tempt you from the off the shelf PID controller though. There are plenty of ready made microcontroller solutions you can buy for £20 or so. Most have worked examples showing you how to make an ADC readings and drive a DAC outputs (or analogue out using driving resistors from your output ports).
If your PID controller has built in analogue and digital buffers then I guess its the best thing to use. Your system is then pretty much COTS and you have a £200 EMMA! Which PID controller are you looking at BTW?
 
Please elaborate. Are you talking about the PFC chopping the AC? The EMMA seems to get by with a PFC and off the shelf filter. What filter would you use?
Otherwise the circuits I have seen have inputs protected with clamps, use opto isolators etc. I see no reasons why they could not meet CE so long as the build design is sensible.


Agree, being a lazy engineer is usually best.
I would try and tempt you from the off the shelf PID controller though. There are plenty of ready made microcontroller solutions you can buy for £20 or so. Most have worked examples showing you how to make an ADC readings and drive a DAC outputs (or analogue out using driving resistors from your output ports).
If your PID controller has built in analogue and digital buffers then I guess its the best thing to use. Your system is then pretty much COTS and you have a £200 EMMA! Which PID controller are you looking at BTW?


To meet CE radiated and conducted emissions you need a filter designed for dirty circuits like thyristors. An off the shelf one is about £50. You also need to protect for failure mechanisms which could cause a fire so fuse is required for the thyristor or crydom unit. An MCB is required because the crydom unit and thyristors have a significant leakage current when off so regs demand a switch as its above 25VA

I have just been costing it up and it comes to more like £500. I am also having problems sourcing the PID controller to match the 10 V o/p cts that EMMA uses. they need a load > 2Mohms and the controller needs an external analogue set point. so I have been tempted to the dark side by my son and a colleague who have offered to lay out a pcb and do the micro controller programming . This should bring the cost to under £250
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To meet CE radiated and conducted emissions you need a filter designed for dirty circuits like thyristors. An off the shelf one is about £50.
Would you mind posting a link to a suitable unit?

I have just been costing it up and it comes to more like £500.
Thats a lot! I was expecting a lot less but I have not looked at the cost of the CTs.

I think that you are best going with a microcontroller. As pointed out the Arduino projects at openenergy monitor forums are well worth looking at.
There are examples showing how to log your systems performance to the cloud and then you can monitor your system from your smart phone or web browser. You would struggle to do that with a PID controller + the extra cost of the PID controller.
 
I have been tempted to the dark side by my son and a colleague who have offered to lay out a pcb and do the micro controller programming . This should bring the cost to under £250
In that case, how about going all the way and using a triac (opto-isolated ones available for about £5) rather than the Crydom controller? Get a sniff of AC voltage and generate the trigger pulses yourself.
 
Would recommend a two stage filter Buy Power Line Filter 2 stage chassis mount filter,16A Schaffner FN 2060-16/06 online from RS for next day delivery. this one is under £30 you can get a single stage for half that but not sure it would pass CE. DIN rail mounted ones are available as well but horribly expensive £100 touch
Or if you really wanted to economise you could buy a couple of washing machine filters (they seem to be single-stage) and put them in series. They can handle the current. I did wonder if the suppression would be less effective due to the size of a washing machine motor, but the component values seem to be comparable.
 
In that case, how about going all the way and using a triac (opto-isolated ones available for about £5) rather than the Crydom controller? Get a sniff of AC voltage and generate the trigger pulses yourself.

Yes, I would go all the way on the TRIAC.
Generating the pulse yourself would be easier than interfacing to the Crydom.
To generate the pulse you just need to detect zero cross - a diode on a digital input would do (some braver sole may forget the diode and just use the digital input's ESD protection). Arm a counter counting down from the DIO trigger and you're done. OK some calibration needed. All microcontrollers will have a counter and/or PWM on board.
With the Crydom you have to generate and buffer an analogue signal using a DAC or resistor chain. Needing an onboard DAC is going to heavily cut down on your microcontroller choice. There are plenty available but perhaps not on a ready built evaluation boards.
I am digital & find analogue tricky, perhaps you're the other way. The timer / PWM arm software is just a few lines and there will be plenty of examples available.
If you use DIO then you just need an analogue circuit to protect the CT inputs. If you buy an microcontroller evaluation board then there should be space enough in the prototyping area to fit that circuit.
Without knowing your CTs cost I would say that your down to £100 or so with your line filter.
Evaluation controller £30 + £5 TRIAC + Case&Heatsink + £5 CT clipper + CTs + On/Off switch & fuse + £30 line filter.
 
Yes, I would go all the way on the TRIAC.
Generating the pulse yourself would be easier than interfacing to the Crydom.
To generate the pulse you just need to detect zero cross - a diode on a digital input would do (some braver sole may forget the diode and just use the digital input's ESD protection). Arm a counter counting down from the DIO trigger and you're done. OK some calibration needed. All microcontrollers will have a counter and/or PWM on board.
With the Crydom you have to generate and buffer an analogue signal using a DAC or resistor chain. Needing an onboard DAC is going to heavily cut down on your microcontroller choice. There are plenty available but perhaps not on a ready built evaluation boards.
I am digital & find analogue tricky, perhaps you're the other way. The timer / PWM arm software is just a few lines and there will be plenty of examples available.
If you use DIO then you just need an analogue circuit to protect the CT inputs. If you buy an microcontroller evaluation board then there should be space enough in the prototyping area to fit that circuit.
Without knowing your CTs cost I would say that your down to £100 or so with your line filter.
Evaluation controller £30 + £5 TRIAC + Case&Heatsink + £5 CT clipper + CTs + On/Off switch & fuse + £30 line filter.

Yes I find the analogue easy as I have experience in phase lock loops and analogue control loops. The crydom is attractive only as no interfacing at mains voltage is required and I don't have to design a snubber which is notoriously difficult to test without creating a bucket full of dead bits. I may also consider the option of an entirely analogue loop with a micro-controller to supervise,feed a display of power, logging and some load switching. I need to get on and build a prototype ( pressure from a queue of friends who followed my advice with the PV system and want the immersion controller ) and so will probably postpone the triac for a phase 2 cost reduction. Many thanks for the inputs very useful
 

Reply to Immersion Heater - PV electricity in the Central Heating Systems area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi, Small flat, currently has a small'ish feed water tank, top of a cupboard, feed through a wall into under stairs cupboard. Hot water tank...
Replies
5
Views
487
The unit only heats water using the programmed boost and when pressed in the 1 2 or Cont boost function. I have checked the off-peak time which...
Replies
7
Views
467
I have taken delivery of an undersink water heater. It is fitted with an RCD on the electrical supply cable which terminates with a euro-plug. I...
Replies
19
Views
2K
Hi, Have normal fused immersion heater switch. I would like to add a smart wifi switch to it so when my Solar is producing over 3k spare, going...
Replies
2
Views
2K
Hi All. Its been ages since I have been on here- Fortunately log in details stored on PC. I have just had a new boiler and 210 ltr unvented tank...
Replies
9
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top