just a thought

[jaypp]

hi all and thank you for knowledge and humour/banter shared.
as you know, i am a new member still in the 'honeymoon period'. i enjoy reading posts, opinions, banter and peoples interpretation of regs. i must say i am a little surprised at how often thread posts manage to refer to peoples' qualifications and method achieved. my thought is this; in a world, where increasingly, 'it's someone elses fault' (e.g. where there's blame, there's a claim), insurance companies etc. need a ready supply of 'covered' persons to lay blame upon. i remember being told about losses, for example, at a supermarket due to freezers failing, the first thing they want to know is 'who carried last works out?' in order to claim from their insurers. also, did the rise of quick access to installation qualifications immediately follow part p legislation? if so, why? mostly, i think, members are directing their frustration at the wrong party/parties.
thanks for reading

 

[Engineer54]

hi all and thank you for knowledge and humour/banter shared.
as you know, i am a new member still in the 'honeymoon period'. i enjoy reading posts, opinions, banter and peoples interpretation of regs. i must say i am a little surprised at how often thread posts manage to refer to peoples' qualifications and method achieved. my thought is this; in a world, where increasingly, 'it's someone elses fault' (e.g. where there's blame, there's a claim), insurance companies etc. need a ready supply of 'covered' persons to lay blame upon. i remember being told about losses, for example, at a supermarket due to freezers failing, the first thing they want to know is 'who carried last works out?' in order to claim from their insurers. also, did the rise of quick access to installation qualifications immediately follow part p legislation? if so, why? mostly, i think, members are directing their frustration at the wrong party/parties.
thanks for reading

What installation qualifications the have none, they hold nothing of any standing!! And Yes it is all associated with Part Pee so you can blame the Scheme providers, but those that went that course, are not as innocent as some here try to make out...

 

[markc123]

Agreed.

Scheme providers are money grabbers who don't care about the trade, i no doubt every walk of life has such people.

The people that takes these pathetic courses, are typical of todays society "i want everything NOW." People don't want to wait 4years, when they think they can be done within 5weeks or 17days...it's greed, they see the pound signs flying and gullably get sucked into the whole mess.

They're both to blame.