Search the forum,

Discuss L and N markings on front of RCD in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

kingeri

-
Esteemed
Arms
Reaction score
1,345
Morning all, many RCDs have N or L marked on the front of them, to indicate polarity, but just looking at a bunch of Niglon pre-populated CUs and the RCDs all have N in the top left corner on the front, which I thought meant the left terminals are Neutral, but the Neutral bar is in the right hand connector. Any ideas? Am I just being dumb?
 
It would only make a difference if the neutral was a late break contact. I could be wrong but I’m sure you only get that on 3Φ&N units. So it shouldn’t make a difference. Just looks bad.
 
Morning all, many RCDs have N or L marked on the front of them, to indicate polarity, but just looking at a bunch of Niglon pre-populated CUs and the RCDs all have N in the top left corner on the front, which I thought meant the left terminals are Neutral, but the Neutral bar is in the right hand connector. Any ideas? Am I just being dumb?

Yes, whoever populated those boards have not taken any notice of the polarity of the RCD's!!

Some manufactures work from left to right on populating design layout of CU's and others right to left....
 
The thing is that they were supplied like that.

Must have been a new boy on the factory assembly line!! lol!!

The L and N designations (when provided) on protective assemblies, indicates the internal circuitry polarity, which they want you to adhere to on final installation connections...
 
Why are there still questions like this?
Hasn't a manufacturer got a duty to state what is safe to do with a product?

As it's AC how can it make a difference?

Is it just so that the connections correspond with the diagram on the device? - except those which don't have L & N marked.

What about if you wanted to connect the supply to the bottom terminals?
Is that ok? If so, how can the polarity matter?
 
Why are there still questions like this?
Hasn't a manufacturer got a duty to state what is safe to do with a product?

As it's AC how can it make a difference?

Is it just so that the connections correspond with the diagram on the device? - except those which don't have L & N marked.

What about if you wanted to connect the supply to the bottom terminals?
Is that ok? If so, how can the polarity matter?

It doesn't normally matter if you supply top or bottom of a typical RCD device, ( depends on the manufacturers instructions) but if you look at the small diagram on the face of RCD units you will see that it's the neutral conductor that's being monitored, not the live conductor.... To be honest i can't remember ever seeing an RCD device that didn't have the connections marked L and N... lol!!!
 
It doesn't normally matter if you supply top or bottom of a typical RCD device, ( depends on the manufacturers instructions) but if you look at the small diagram on the face of RCD units you will see that it's the neutral conductor that's being monitored, not the live conductor.... To be honest i can't remember ever seeing an RCD device that didn't have the connections marked L and N... lol!!!

so what you are saying is that the L and N connections must be in the L and N terminals as marked by manufacturer, no the other way round.
 
does to me as well, but what has happened to the OP is ( as i read it) the CUs have been assembled with RCD on the right, when they should have been on the left.
 
look at the small diagram on the face of RCD units you will see that it's the neutral conductor that's being monitored, not the live conductor.
No that's not right.
They are both 'monitored' like a clamp meter.

Only when there is an imbalance will the residual current be noticed.
220px-FISkizze.svg.png
 
does to me as well, but what has happened to the OP is ( as i read it) the CUs have been assembled with RCD on the right, when they should have been on the left.

Who knows?? lol!! To be honest i've never heard of the CU/Device manufacturer. Perhaps the OP could contact them and ask some relevant questions, ...such as why are they supplying populated CU's, with the RCD's marked Neutral connection, connected to the MCB's buss-bar?? lol!!
 
that's how i see it. can't see how they are polarity conscious. as long as the current in each pole is the same ( or at least the difference is < the actual tripping current required ) then they work as meant.
 
If the poles are marked wrong then either the RCds concerned are mickey mouse in quality or they are the wrong RCDs for the consumer unit, why should anyone have to re labell a RCD? just not acceptable IMO, It should be very easy for the manufacturer to get this right, another ridiculous situation here, I have never come across this, so something is amiss surely, Whats going on then?
 
No that's not right.
They are both 'monitored' like a clamp meter.

Only when there is an imbalance will the residual current be noticed.
View attachment 16327

That is basically a simplified illustration diagram. If you get the chance, open up a duff unit your going to bin and check the actual internal arrangements...

Well the question to answer then, is Why would the manufacturers bother to mark connection posts?? They wouldn't mark if their was no reason, that would be a cost loss... lol!!
 
Geoff, I can't remember seeing an RCD with a marking on a pole, what make is that Bud?

edit I now see it is Volex, never used one of those TBH

Just remembered i have 3 makes of RCD in the car (Contractors submitted samples) , so i've braved the rain to go check myself. ...Hager, Gweiss and Aoelec, ....All three have the L and N marked top and bottom..
 
Just remembered i have 3 makes of RCD in the car (Contractors submitted samples) , so i've braved the rain to go check myself. ...Hager, Gweiss and Aoelec, ....All three have the L and N marked top and bottom..


I meant without a marking, sorry fella, was agreeing with you this time, typing too fast and not looking properly haha
 
Well, ...i think i'll stick with connecting such marked devices (of any description) as indicated by the manufacturer. You lot can do as you please!! lol!!
 
The Volex RCDs don't have markings.

I suppose because one is on the left and one is on the right but I would think they are the same inside.
 
I believe you Geoff, I have never seen a volex RCD, I gave up on volex after seeing the range of kit they make, appalling, they should be banned here haha
 
The Volex RCDs don't have markings.

I suppose because one is on the left and one is on the right but I would think they are the same inside.

How do you think other manufacturers CU/RCD's work then, having the same arrangement as your top of the range Volex? eg, ...2 RCD's one on the right and one on the left?
 
I crossed this issue today funnily enough.

Existing board where so numpty had swapped the RCCB device out for a MAIN SWITCH. Due to the configuration of the board and length of existing cables etc I had no option but to label the tails and both RCCB units up. Tails entered the board on the right but labeling on the RCCB device indicates that the board should have had the tails enter from the left.

Testing of the devices afterwards proved that they still operated as intended and a MAIN ISOLATOR has been installed in front of the board.

Square D Domae
 
Got a crabtree board to go back too after chrimbo, split load, BUT the 80A RCCB is off, taped up. All circuits still fed through it!!!


Neutral bars linked. Can't wait to have a look what some bodger has come up with. And then of course discover & resolve the fault that stumped them
 
well, if it's in shropshire, it's probably been installed by a conservative MP or a horse. if it smells of sh*t, it's the former.
 
Its one of thoses houses that had the full treatment; take the light fitting down in the kitchen to find a fist sized hole and the old rose pendant shoved into the void, flex conn'd to the new light.
 
That is basically a simplified illustration diagram. If you get the chance, open up a duff unit your going to bin and check the actual internal arrangements...

You've now intrigued me. It was my belief that an RCD works on the balance/inbalance of current in and out. ie. the sum of current through Line(s) and Neutral = 0. If you say only one is monitored how does it monitor the inbalance?

At the moment haven't got an old RCD to butcher!
 
You've now intrigued me. It was my belief that an RCD works on the balance/inbalance of current in and out. ie. the sum of current through Line(s) and Neutral = 0. If you say only one is monitored how does it monitor the inbalance?

At the moment haven't got an old RCD to butcher!

I've got one...might set about it later
 
You've now intrigued me. It was my belief that an RCD works on the balance/inbalance of current in and out. ie. the sum of current through Line(s) and Neutral = 0. If you say only one is monitored how does it monitor the inbalance?

At the moment haven't got an old RCD to butcher!

My mistake yellowvanman, trying to squint looking at the diagram in the face of a budget RCD, and it's basically only a simplified diagram lol!!

Yes your correct on the balance/imbalance thing, but i'm pretty sure that there is a very good reason why they are polarised by the manufacturers. we'll just have to wait and see what Spartykus comes up with when he opens his duff unit up (with photo's hopefully)!! lol!! Might even get the contractor here to open an old MG unit, when i go back after the company Xmas trip...
 
The sensing coil couldn't possibly be 'measuring' one conductor only, what would it be comparing it against to get its trip current?
 
Well IMO actually at the very least connecting the correct conductors to the identified poles is at least good practice, too much crap on here, any spark I employed connecting a neutral to the marked L connection on an RCD would get an early bath, regardless so there, if the RCD won't connect to the board you have then buy one that will, My god my Mentor would roll in his grave if I didn't consider the correct connections to the marked poles, too much Bull Sh*t today, get a grip and do the job right FFS
 

Reply to L and N markings on front of RCD in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

A few weeks ago I posted this in another thread...: The tripping kept occurring, so I went back and moved a likely candidate circuit to the...
Replies
2
Views
1K
Morning All I recently completed my first re wire and board change, (with help from the owner who is a gas fitter and plumper, who works with my...
Replies
0
Views
1K
Hi all, Was wondering if anyone has come across this before and could maybe help - Its a new one to me! Customer recently altered layout of...
Replies
7
Views
2K
Had a call out at a dental practice at 19:00 last night in the end I left the fault disconnect requiring further investigation. This fault not...
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Locked
  • Sticky
Beware a little long. I served an electrical apprenticeship a long time ago, then went back to full time education immediately moving away from...
Replies
55
Views
5K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top