• IMPORTANT: Please note that nobody on this forum should be seeking from or providing advice to those who are not competent and / or trained and qualified in their field (local laws permitting). There is a discussion thread on this global industry-wide matter HERE. This also has more information about the warning with regards to sharing electrical advice in some countries. By using this forum you do so in agreement to this.

Discuss Should a giant steel framed human aquarium be earth bonded? in the Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Welcome to ElectriciansForums.net - The American Electrical Advice Forum
Head straight to the main forums to chat by click here:   American Electrical Advice Forum

Deuce

-
Esteemed
Reaction score
420
I have a large, portable steel framed tank. approx 6m x 2m x 2m. It is used for actors/models to perform in for a variety of productions.

For many years now, I have had conflicting advice about whether or not it should be earth bonded. The initial response is "it's a giant steel structure, bond it!!". But then invariably someone else comes along and points out that, should the tank itself become energised, the people in the water within the tank would become part of the return to earth - the current would flow through the tank and them. If it was not bonded, as it is by design insulated, they would be ok. At least until they tried to leave the tank.

To date our solution has been to be super cautious of anything that could even present the possibility of bringing current to the tank itself. But how do we make a once and for all decision on whether it should be bonded without any professional consensus of opinion?
 
I have a large, portable steel framed tank. approx 6m x 2m x 2m. It is used for actors/models to perform in for a variety of productions.

For many years now, I have had conflicting advice about whether or not it should be earth bonded. The initial response is "it's a giant steel structure, bond it!!". But then invariably someone else comes along and points out that, should the tank itself become energised, the people in the water within the tank would become part of the return to earth - the current would flow through the tank and them. If it was not bonded, as it is by design insulated, they would be ok. At least until they tried to leave the tank.

To date our solution has been to be super cautious of anything that could even present the possibility of bringing current to the tank itself. But how do we make a once and for all decision on whether it should be bonded without any professional consensus of opinion?
It would be site specific.
 
Earthing and bonding as far as I’m aware as 2 separate things

Maybe I'm wrong in my terminology. I thought bonding was the connection of two conductive systems, and in this case bonding the tank to earth = earth bonding. Feel free to educate me though - that's why I'm here asking :)
 
It would be site specific.

Can you give me an example of a site where bonding the tank would not put those inside at risk if it were to become live?

We take site specific factors into account for a variety of reasons but I can't see how the tank being earthed would ever be a good thing for the people in the tank.
 
For clarity; my concern is that because the tank is full of water, it is the equivalent of forming a conductive shell around the occupants, and then passing current through it. It's not the same as earthing a fridge so that if the outer skin becomes live, anyone touching it doesn't carry the current. It's the equivalent of making them part of the earthed item itself.
 
Is Rcp ≥ (Uo/Ib)? What earthing arrangement does the electrical installation have?

Varies! Our own kit (the filtration system) is bunded in case of leaks and all electrical fully isolated from the water passing through it. The environment alters as the tank is used at various studios and venues around the world.
 
So the whole tank and its associated equipment is effectively portable? It plugs in? It's also used in a variety of building structures ie some will have metal building elements in reach of the tank others won't........ Lol, You might have mentioned this in the OP
 
Is this fixed or mobile? I would be tempted to do a risk assessment where it is filled,and keep all cable connections away from it. Well away.
In my opinion,depending on where it is sited,the least number of possible electrical connections to it - the better.
 
What is the tank sitting on/ in?

In the case of swimming pools, they are in or on the ground (earth). The idea behind pool bonding is that everything touchable is brought to the same potential and therefore minimises shock risk. TN-C-S earthing systems are not allowed due to the risk of a disconnected neutral and the consequence of mains potential within the pool area.

My view would be to TT it and have anything near it on a 30mA RCD.
 
What is the tank sitting on/ in?

In the case of swimming pools, they are in or on the ground (earth). The idea behind pool bonding is that everything touchable is brought to the same potential and therefore minimises shock risk. TN-C-S earthing systems are not allowed due to the risk of a disconnected neutral and the consequence of mains potential within the pool area.

My view would be to TT it and have anything near it on a 30mA RCD.

The one constant is that wherever the tank goes, 30ma RCD is the standard.

The tank is always sat upon a butyl membrane, so it's isolated.

If it was TT'd, of course that is a sound path to discharge current. But if the clamp is at the base of the tank, and a live lamp collapses and hits the top of the tank, the current would flow down through the tank and the water and through the people inside it surely. In that scenario wouldn't it be better that it was left isolated?
 
So there's 230v lighting within zone 1? This just gets better....
Did the tank and its associated equipment come as a certified design or is it just something that was fabricated and that's evolved and been added to?
 
If the tank was bonded I doubt anyone in side it would see any current flow in fault condition as the current would find the path of least resistance to ground though the nice conducting water.

But really this needs someone who a expert in the field of swimming pool safety
 
The one constant is that wherever the tank goes, 30ma RCD is the standard.

The tank is always sat upon a butyl membrane, so it's isolated.

If it was TT'd, of course that is a sound path to discharge current. But if the clamp is at the base of the tank, and a live lamp collapses and hits the top of the tank, the current would flow down through the tank and the water and through the people inside it surely. In that scenario wouldn't it be better that it was left isolated?

The 30mA RCD is the key. It will disconnect the supply before the current gets to a dangerous level (50mA). If you didn't have the TT, then the tank would remain live and the RCD would not operate. That is until someone or something created the earth path.

Which do you think is safer?
 
Nice clean water is not a good conductor:)

I think the additional information,increases my belief that this needs a specialist,risk assessment.

Next,we will be told that these performers are lowered in this tank,using an electric crane,and i can think of half a dozen RA issues,on that fact,alone.:eek:
 

Reply to Should a giant steel framed human aquarium be earth bonded? in the Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top