Search the forum,

Discuss Part P & the 17th Edition. in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

OK just had to do some digging through the Part P document and it seems to be a little out of date as it refers to complying with BS7671:2001.................:eek: And this was just downloaded from the planning portal!!!
 
until bs7671 is statutory law , any man and his dog can carry out instalation work , our only foothold as qualified tradesmen is the electricity at work regs 1989 , i just hope the proposed law going through parliment that every home needs a full test and inspect cert for electrical safety , before they get home insurance
 
until bs7671 is statutory law , any man and his dog can carry out instalation work , our only foothold as qualified tradesmen is the electricity at work regs 1989 , i just hope the proposed law going through parliment that every home needs a full test and inspect cert for electrical safety , before they get home insurance

Not strictly true Sparks1974, The building regs are statutory and part p advocates bs7671. So if not 7671 what standard does the man and his dog work to?
 
How To Improve Part P

Scrap defined scope

I've lost count of jobs that i have attended where a new boiler has been installed and bonding to the services has been upgraded to current regs only to find on closer inspection that the 10mm bond to the clamp on the gas meter is joined to the original clamp with undersized cable and shoved into the cavity with the hole resealed.​

I have spoken to a gas guy who informed me he was worried about the lack of technical advice offered on his part p course,the whole of the class filled in a certificate together, they were showed how to wire 2way lighting on a stairwell and if they asked any questions they were reminded exactly what parts of thier book to read that would be covered in the exam.​

Would a defined scope installer be able to correctly identify different earthing arrangments, or understand fully the results taken on a ring final test before they add an extra socket or spur. I imagine some would but i would guess the majority would not. This means that potential faults may get overlooked and the only people to benifit from this situation is the course providers.​

Conclusion

Scrap defined scope, its potentially dangerous and confuses the customer and does not benifit part p in any way except to make it a joke!​
 
This whole situation STINKS ! nothing more nothing less !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! what the rule makers are saving is gas is dangerous BUT electricity ISNT !!!!!!!!!!!! what makes me mad is ANYONE can do most electrical jobs including domestics without any knowledge AT ALL about the dangers that pose from shoddy electrical work eg an adition or alteration to an electrical circuit ! minor works my butt to us it might be BUT to joe public these installs could STILL pose a danger of badly installed workmanship ! it really is a sore subject for me as ive been to sort out some real crap and dangerous installs BECAUSE the diy bloke or doll CAN as non notifyable !!!!! WHY cant we have the same as gas installers ? non QUALIFIED CANT touch as simple as that !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
There are an infinite number of dangerous tasks that the householder and members of the public can undertake. Should we allow them/us to climb up ladders, replace a roof tile, point the chimney, fit a new staircase. How many deaths are due to electrocution in the home each year and compare that to the 3000 or so in car crashes-should we criminalise home car mechanics?

This idea that we should regulate against the incompetent, those lacking experience or stupid if taken to its logical conclusion would result in everyone having to pay a specialist for every task that was beyond his or her qualified experience.

The role of the professional is to serve the public, if Joe public makes a mess of the electrics in his house the professional electrician puts it right. It is the demonstration of competence and skill at a fair price that elevates the professional electrician into the premier league: while the rogues and incompetent languish in some lowly non league division.

The need for a comprehensive electrical report when a house changes hands goes a long way toward remedying electrical malpractice. The incompetent amateur will be slowly worked out of the system because there will be no financial advantage in doing work, or paying a cowboy for work that has to be put right by a skilled electrician at a later date.

The status of electricians is best raised by focusing on doing good work. People in every area of endeavor who provide quality service at a reasonable price succeed in the long run.
 
Ill be honest Part P is another tax on electricians now made more difficult with the wholesalers selling CDU's to the general public for peanuts i have a board covered in pics of dodgy electrics some from rented properties and some potential fire pics as all you guys have seen over the years ,how many times do you go into some ones house and they say well i just added this extra socket found one in an elderly couples house wired in bell wire joined with terminal block under the carpet nice eh not notified not done correctly just bodged who is to stop them
 
There are an infinite number of dangerous tasks that the householder and members of the public can undertake. Should we allow them/us to climb up ladders, replace a roof tile, point the chimney, fit a new staircase. How many deaths are due to electrocution in the home each year and compare that to the 3000 or so in car crashes-should we criminalise home car mechanics?

Should we use the same argument with gas installs ?
 
Should we use the same argument with gas installs ?

How are we different to gas installers?
Anyone can buy gas fittings and products the same as electrical.
Anyone can carry out the work as long as it's tested, connected and commissioned by a Gas Safe registered engineer. This is not allowed under part p as you can only certify your own work (or go down the labc route).
There is nothing to stop anyone carrying out other plumbing work, I'm in the process of moving a radiator now.

The main difference is that plumbers are not constantly whining about the need for professionalism in their trade.

And how is part p a tax?
It costs me £1.50 to notify a job and that's paid to the niceic not hmrc, the same as my annual fee.

Although to be fair I am paying more tax since part p because of the extra work it's generating for me.
 
‘Part P’ or should it be ‘All Poo’

I have been running my own electrical contracting business for the past four years and have been Part P full scope with ELECSA before I transferred to NICEIC, big mistake, purely for marketing reasons as the NICEIC are more popular, (but certainly NOT the best). They have builders, plumbers in there as it’s easier to pass, hence more membership, more money for them.

Having paid my annual Part P fee and registering every job at £1.50+vat with Elecsa, it cost £3 with
NICEIC, £1.50 for LABC and £1.50 for consumers insurance which is compulsory with NICEIC. (Yes you pay your customers insurance for the work you have done.) With Elecsa it is an option and the consumer pays it if they want to, but not you. Another money making spinner for NICEIC and you guessed it, it’s NICEIC’s own insurance.

So Part P, does it work and if so, for who?

Well it’s a tough time out there with stiff competition and price’s dropping through the floor and competing with ‘non Part P’ registered, companies and individuals I was dropping my prices and still losing work and had to make 3 electricians redundant. It was time to get tough myself so I reported some of these Non registered’ electricians to Elecsa and NICEIC. Both were not interested as they told me they only administer Part P, not police it!!. One advised I report to the LABC, so I did.

The LABC told me that they will only look into it if safety or building regs had been compromised and if I had sufficient evidence, although this did not mean they would take action. They would NOT take action for someone just not registering a Part P job if no ‘actual’ regulation had not been adhered to.

This would cost too much and they do not have the manpower resources available. The chap at LABC I spoke to said they are aware of the problem and appreciates my concern but there are ‘to many’ electricians as well as the public doing work that should be certified and it is an impossible task to deal with. He also mentioned that B&Q don’t help as they sell consumer units and have wiring diagrams mounted above the selves showing the public how to connect them!! This is encouraging the public to ‘have a go’ and no mention on these boards that it is against the law or that this work must be certified.

Good point.

I could not believe it!! The so called ‘powers at be’ are powerless!!

I asked myself “Why am I paying £460, plus a days unpaid time for the assessment and paying £1.50 for each job, (£3.00 with NICEIC) I register. What’s in it for me and who benefits apart from the likes of ELECSA, NICEIC etc.

All these organisations want your money but do nothing for it. They are even in competition with each other. I have had email marketing from NAPIT to transfer to them as they had a better deal than ELECSA and NICEIC.

B&Q don’t give a dam about how they effect your business or Part P with what they sell, they just want to make many more £Millions.
ELECSA, NICEIC, NAPIT They want to make money out of us but don’t support us.
LABC are aware of the problems but don’t want to know, it cost them to much.

Joe Public, well do they know what part P is? They just require a cheaper job doing as possible. It doesn’t matter whether your Part P or not. I had two people last year ask if I was Part P registered, one of these jobs was to replace a light fitting in the lounge which of course is not a Part P requirement, the other thought Part P was PAT, Portable Appliance Testing. The public are unaware of it’s existence or the ones that do get there ‘wires crossed’ and misinterpret what it is and so to do a lot of electricians.

Do you ever hear in the press or trade magazines of anyone getting prosecuted? There were a few when Part P was first introduced. Is there any publicity or advertising campaign for Part P? No because it cost to must and no organisation will put money into it.

Well enough is enough when my Part P lapsed at the end of September 2010, I decided to ‘pull the plug’ and I did not renew my Part P and won’t be doing either unless things change, very unlikely with government cutbacks there will be even less resources available.

I am all for a registered system but by ONE organisation similar to how Gas Safe is operated not five competing with each other for business.

We electricians are all round losers when it come’s to Part P. If all current Part P registered electricians refused to renew there Part P when due then this may finally send out a message and when these organisations suffer financially as a result only then will they do something.

Mazdaman
 
Well presented,most feel as you do
unfortunately most of us dont seem to have the backbone to act as you have

The end is nigh for part p though
My veiw is that it will quietly fade away as sparks lose all patience and interest with it
The peak of people registering has probably been reached, and the downwards spiral wont be far behind or it may have even began
 
spot on mazdaman, I've been part p registered with elecsa for 4 years,priced a job last year for bathroom electrics but the house holder got a cheaper price and went with them.2 months ago got a phone call off the house holder to say that the bathroom lights were tripping and the original contractor couldn't find the fault.So the good lad that i am i went down to see what they had done.As the lady of the house showed me the bathroom that had been completed (the one that i was under cut on) she was pointing to the lights that had been installed, but it wasn't the lights that got my attention it was the electric towel rail that was fitted directly into the shower enclosure.I phoned elecsa to report it and they said because the installer wasn't registered with them that there was nothing they could do, the only thing would be the customer to report them to trading standards.My renewal is due in march 370+vat.So i pay the renewal,pay the notifications,lose out on jobs and when i report a cowboy nothing can be done.So i think its time to cancel direct debit.
 
Ok you have given up on being Part P registered. As an example.

My daughter who lives in the UK (I don't) had her house rewired as part of an extensive refurb. Her electrician, 65 years old and lifetime electrician but not Part P forged the papers and Building Control checked his registration status and refused to pass the work. After such an abuse of trust my daughter had the builder expose all the electricans work so that it could be fully inspected by registered electrician. After being threatened to be sued by my daughter as well as considering whether it was a police matter he paid for the builders work, the electricians charges and expenses that my daughter had run up in bringing the matter to a solution.

If you want to break the law you have to determine at what level of honesty you want to function at. Are you going to advertise or describe yourself as fully competent but cannot certify work or don't tell people, and rely on them being gullible?

On this website the less competent and law breakers as appropriately called cowboys, everything you write about present injustices I agree with, joining the lawbreakers, however attractive at first glance, is not the way forward.
 
If you are referring to Mazdaman's post he is not proposing to break the law. He is a competent electrician and he is just not accepting the responsibility for notification. It is perfectly legal for him to do notifiable work, it just falls on the client to do the notification if they choose to use a non part P registered electrician. He is not saying he will not certificate work or not do it to BS 7671.

Your case is completely different, the person in question was attempting fraud.
 
My renewal is due in march 370+vat.So i pay the renewal,pay the notifications,lose out on jobs and when i report a cowboy nothing can be done.So i think its time to cancel direct debit.

Until such time sanctions are imposed on the scum of our industry why should you pay some **** to regulate you ? If more people woke up and smelt the coffee the part p scam would collapse and the dole queues would be full of people who could never practice what they preached because the scum would under cut them as well as us.

Good on you for being a realist.
 
So by dropping out of your relative scheme and saving £370, and breaking the law by not notifying labc, you will be able to drop your prices by so much that you will be able to undercut all the other law breakers out there.

I don't think so.
 
So by dropping out of your relative scheme and saving £370, and breaking the law by not notifying labc, you will be able to drop your prices by so much that you will be able to undercut all the other law breakers out there.

I don't think so.


If paying a scam provider for membership brings no benefits whatsoever - why pay them?

I don't see your point, to be honest.
 
If paying a scam provider for membership brings no benefits whatsoever - why pay them?

I don't see your point, to be honest.

To comply with the law ...............if your part of a scheme then you can do notifiable work without contacting the local building authority. Once you have completed the work you notify your scheme who will then complete all the paperwork with the LBA and then issue the client the completed certificate.

If you not a member of a scheme then before you can start any notifiable work it is the onus of the home owner to notify the LBA of what work is being done and the LBA will issure you warrnet to start the work. Depending on who is performing the work ie DIY'er or a qualified electrician a scale of charges will be meted out by the LBA.
 
I had the same experience, my local LABC said it took 6 weeks for the NICEIC to notify them of my work,
now I just send builing control my certs by email, (saves me £1.50) :D

On topic I would ditch part "pee" altogether, when your undercut by every tom dick & harry & pay
over £3000 to middlemen before the work comes in I can honestly say part "p" is a massive failure (does anyone actually police it !!)
Almost just let it be
 
Almost just let it be

???????

Let what be?, Part P?

Nope, In my very own experience it doesn't work, again I find myself clearing up other people's electrical mess while they walk away scott free, it doesn't annoy me at all because I'm sure a lot of the folk here have clearing up other peoples mess years before Part P was forced upon us, & it won't stop whatever laws are put in place.
 
If you have been accepted onto a scheme you are effectively part p compliant and your scheme provider would then notify the LABC , for a small fee, on your behalf :)

If you are accepted onto a Scheme you have been deemed competent and can self-certify - nothing more.

You can go direct to LABC and comply with Part P.

It must be remembered that it is ONLY the work carried out that must comply with Part P of the building regs.
 
If you are accepted onto a Scheme you have been deemed competent and can self-certify - nothing more.

You can go direct to LABC and comply with Part P.

It must be remembered that it is ONLY the work carried out that must comply with Part P of the building regs.


But Prof, If you are registered with a scheme, it gives customers a little more faith in you and also its cheaper on your behalf to be in the scheme.

For me its better to be in a club than not.
 
If you are accepted onto a Scheme you have been deemed competent and can self-certify - nothing more.

From some of the work I've seen I would say that's debatable, surely scheme providers wouldn't turn a blind eye to some of the competent persons mistakes for the money........would they. :skep:
 
But Prof, If you are registered with a scheme, it gives customers a little more faith in you and also its cheaper on your behalf to be in the scheme.

For me its better to be in a club than not.

From my experience your workmanship is what makes your reputation, I was with a scheme provider for 7 years, only once did I get a contract for being in a scheme, all my other work has been through recommendations.
 
From some of the work I've seen I would say that's debatable, surely scheme providers wouldn't turn a blind eye to some of the competent persons mistakes for the money........would they. :skep:


They would and do as a matter of routine.

We are all well aware of the abysmal standard of work carried out by some "competent" persons - yet this is not reflected in the number of complaints.

What you have to remember is that the complaints process that the the Scams operate is DESIGNED to ensure that the number of complaints that are upheld is kept to a minimum (remember, the Scams write their own complaints procedures) - the fact that the Schemes join UKAS (another membership scam) and then ignore the rules that don`t suit may have something to do with this situation.



Did you know that there is NO EXTERNAL, INDEPENDENT MONITORING of the actual standard of work carried out by scam members i.e. an independent assessment of individuals and the work they carry out?

Every Scam operator carries out it`s own assessments which does NOT comply with UKAS guidelines - this is done because assessments make ALOT of money, and they don`t want to run the risk of such practices coming under external scrutiny.

The industry finds it more convenient to carry out yet more box-ticking exercises from a distance because they know full well what they would find in the field.

I have heard the same old excuses for so long now "don`t you think it is better to have these incompetents inside the Scheme,s (i.e. where we can make money out of them) where they can be policed (they are not anyway) , than outside where they cannot?(where they would be outside our sphere of financial influence)".

It is no good fooling ourselves - the fraud is there for all who wish to see ....
 
The way forward with the part p is to rip it up and burn it... Its a complete failuire as the competent persons scheme allows some one with relatively little experience pass a 17th ed course... Buy test equipment regs and guidance notes and this makes them competent? For some who have worked in the trade this is ideal .... But for someone blagging.... Its just as bad as a cowboy doing the work..... Are any scheme providers going to turn down all that revenue??? They are basically cash cows. Ban the sale of all electrical equipment to all non competent sparks end of story... But that will not happen either!???
 
In this and many other commenteries there is a focus of the failures of others to follow the rules relating to electrical practice and that some of the rules are defective and enforcement is inadequate.


If you are to focus on the necessity to abide by the rules then in order to avoid hypocrisy I presume you who criticise will be diligent in ensuring every cash payment you receive is recorded for tax purposes, that you carefully separate and pay out of your earnings the equipment you install in your own home, that you drive within the speed limit, when required you use scaffold rather than a ladder, you have taken the trouble to be fully conversant with the building regs and vat legislation to the extent that it your business is required, that your vehicle is not only MOTed but safe. It goes without saying that you will never have tasted cannabis or taken hard drugs or turn up for electrical installation work hung over or too ill to do the job properly


In my opinion it is impossible for a young person to start a business and not break the rules in some way by both accident and design. In my observations most drivers exceed the speed limit they and we are rule breakers, sometimes there is the added possibility of our rule breaking putting ourselves and others in danger. If you are a rule breaker in some area of human endevor temper your indignation at fellow rule breakers who happen to exercise their deficiencies in electrical installation.

The thing about rules is to make it as simple as possible once you are working to simple rules there are no excuses for anything less than average performance.

Is it a requirement that you have to be an intellectual giant to understand the rules of electrical installation in a domestic situation for example? Well, you don't need to be but the 17th edition is a serious attempt at straining the average persons understanding of the English language. I consider it one of the most useless docuements known to man. Considering we have millions of houses in the UK any industry with a modicum of collective intelligence would have the rules for house wiring presented in a format written specific to housing instead of the present universal document written to test our understanding of language rather than to clearly inform us of electrical standards.

I could go on but I sense I am becoming boring but I thoroughly enjoy reading stuff on this forum.
 
There is also no deterant for the homeowner/ client! If they can get it cheaper from a non registered electrician they don't seem to care about 'part p'
 
"If you are to focus on the necessity to abide by the rules then in order to avoid hypocrisy I presume you who criticise will be diligent in ensuring every cash payment you receive is recorded for tax purposes, that you carefully separate and pay out of your earnings the equipment you install in your own home, that you drive within the speed limit, when required you use scaffold rather than a ladder, you have taken the trouble to be fully conversant with the building regs and vat legislation to the extent that it your business is required, that your vehicle is not only MOTed but safe. It goes without saying that you will never have tasted cannabis or taken hard drugs or turn up for electrical installation work hung over or too ill to do the job properly


In my opinion it is impossible for a young person to start a business and not break the rules in some way by both accident and design. In my observations most drivers exceed the speed limit they and we are rule breakers, sometimes there is the added possibility of our rule breaking putting ourselves and others in danger. If you are a rule breaker in some area of human endevor temper your indignation at fellow rule breakers who happen to exercise their deficiencies in electrical installation"

What a load of complete and utter tosh!!!

"Is it a requirement that you have to be an intellectual giant to understand the rules of electrical installation in a domestic situation for example? Well, you don't need to be but the 17th edition is a serious attempt at straining the average persons understanding of the English language. I consider it one of the most useless docuements known to man. Considering we have millions of houses in the UK any industry with a modicum of collective intelligence would have the rules for house wiring presented in a format written specific to housing instead of the present universal document written to test our understanding of language rather than to clearly inform us of electrical standards."
Glad we got to bit of common sense in the end, it was almost worth it:D
 
In my opinion Part P is an industry money making scam, I went to college part time for 10 years completing C&G 236 pt's 1, 2 and c course 2391 pat testing and went on to get an ONC and HNC in electrical engineering, and i am a senior member of my firms electrical organisation, I also used to be self employed working for myself at the weekends to make a bit extra, and then part P came in, and took away my capability of earning extra money without being scammed yearly for a few hundred pounds to be assessed by somebody less qualified and less competant than me. I agree that there are cowboys out there but Part P has make the cowboys cheaper, I am no longer self employed as it is not worth the hassle.

If the Government want people to get of there backsides and stop scrouging from the tax payers they need to make things easier.
 
If the Government want people to get of there backsides and stop scrouging from the tax payers they need to make things easier.

I agree entirely - an individual licensing system would be easy and would afford assurance to the householder that the INDIVIDUAL entering their premises was actually competent - but that would require people to be trained and experienced, which is far less lucrative than the farce that we are currently enduring.:wink_smile:
 
Hi,

I have been a member of this forum since March 12[SUP]th[/SUP] 2011 and have regularly visited since then and have always enjoyed reading the various threads and feel there are some really decent people on here trying to make an honest living in the face of never ending barriers in front of them.

Don’t know if this is the right place to post this but as this thread concerns Part P and 17[SUP]th[/SUP] edition regs thought I would ask anyway.

Just wondering if any of you lads can give me any advice.

Up until 2000 I was employed as an Electrician in the electrical contracting industry ( building sites, Industrial, Domestic etc ). I had all the qualifications req up to that point which were 16th edition C&G etc.

At that point I left the industry to work in newspaper printing as the lure of sick pay and company pension scheme amongst other things became attractive especially as I was over 40rs old and not getting any younger.

However all good things come to an end and next year in keeping with most things in this country there will be major redundancy’s at the plant I work at.

I may or may not be chosen for redundancy but rather than take a chance and just wait to see if the dreaded letter dropps through my door I thought it best to try and safe guard myself by finding out what would be involved in getting back up to speed with the electrical side of things again.

During the time I have been away from our industry I have still done small jobs domestically for family and friends and tried to keep up with the changes such as Part P and the 17[SUP]th[/SUP] edition regs.

My question is if I was to start up again albeit on a self employed part time basis what is my best route to follow.
regarding courses on 17[SUP]th[/SUP] edition regs and Part P etc to get back up to speed.

What are the beat courses I could look at to achieve this.

If any one could offer any advice I would be very grateful.

Many thanks in advance to anyone who can help.

Kind regards,

Phil.
 
PJE as you have "kept your hand in" basically all you really need is the 17th edition update. As you took the 16th I assume before 2001 you will need to do the complete 3 day course, and chances are your not going to get one of these before the amendment kicks in now, so I would personally wait until the new year and do the C&G 2382-12.

As for the Part P regulations I would recommend this book

Electrician's Guide to the Building Regulations Approved Document P, Electrical Safety in Dwellings: Amazon.co.uk: Books

It covers pretty much everything you need to know and is quite a good guide
 
Hi malcolmsanford,

Many thanks for your quick reply. Have had a look at the link you supplied but having read the reviews it appears there is now an updated version of this.

One review read as follows:

Excellent book, however it is out of date, I spent 19 quid on this only to find out that the updated version is also for sale

Electrician's Guide to the Building Regulations: Pt. P Wiring Regulations : Pt. P Wiring Regulations: Amazon.co.uk: Paul Cook: Books


The original version should be removed from Amazon & I should get the update free !

So I will definitely look into this.

One thing I forgot to mention in my earlier post was that having read through all this thread, it appears if you want to be responsible for signing your own work off you need to be registered with one of the electrical organisations like NICEIC.

Does anyone have any recommendations to which one is the best to go with as I know organisations like these have a tendency to be over officious probably to justify the job they are supposed to do.

Anyway once again many thanks for your help.

Regards,

Phil.
 
Last edited:
In Canada you apply for a permit before you begin work. The "City" send out the Inspector before you even start! Then he calls back to look at a "rough in" if all is good you get the ok to cover up and call him back for final test. Sounds a lot of hastle but it works well and lots of support from the inspector who does actually want it to move at your pace just so long as you are doing it right! Homeowners do DIY elecrical but hey! when they are selling they must report everything and the lawers love it!!
 
Hi there.

I need to get my 17th edition certificate. Can I do the exam without the course? Studying at home by myself?

I know it's much better take te course but now I'm short of money and really need this certificate. Some information or link may help.

Thank you very much.
 
Yes it's true! whether it will get thrown or or not is another thing. I have it straight from the horses mouth. Someone who is part of the governing body & writes the regulations has told me that part P is going to be put before the government, to make it more difficult to be registered.

Within the next year or so, you will have to have qualified with the full City & Guilds 4 year course. So if you are going to take part P, do it now!
 
Yes it's true! whether it will get thrown or or not is another thing. I have it straight from the horses mouth. Someone who is part of the governing body & writes the regulations has told me that part P is going to be put before the government, to make it more difficult to be registered.

Within the next year or so, you will have to have qualified with the full City & Guilds 4 year course. So if you are going to take part P, do it now!

Think the NICEC/NAPIT/ELECSA might have an input on that one
 
We seem to have gone from virtually no statutory requirement, to over regulation.
It's isn't even at the proposal stage yet, so It could be several years.

Something needed doing years ago, because sparkies just started working for themselves & quite a few were bodgers, plumbers, handy men & DIY-ers. All you needed to do was drop a simple completion form in to your regional electricity board & that was it.
 

Reply to Part P & the 17th Edition. in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hello all, First of all I apologise if this is in the wrong forum, I figured the general forum may be the best bet :) Thank you for taking...
Replies
3
Views
609
A bit of a mini essay but these questions have been building up in my mind over the last weeks and months as I've been studying and volunteering...
Replies
6
Views
3K
Hello all, I've just been perusing the AM2/E/S threads on here. Thought you might like a bit of a review. If, like I did, you find yourself...
Replies
7
Views
2K
We have had a rear extension built on our home, and our builder arranged the electrician for the electric work required. I have established that...
Replies
8
Views
1K
Hello all. Been a sparky since I left school (which is rather a long time ago). 17th Edition, and currently not planning to bother with the...
Replies
30
Views
3K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top