Discuss Assistance with my installation in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Reaction score
0
I’m a trainee electrician and would really appreciate the benefit of someone’s skill and experience on the following:

Our house is a TN-C-S (100A fuse) with a main DB (100mA RCD).

This DB feeds a sub DB in a garage outbuilding via a 6mm SWA with all 3 conductors used, by a 63A MCB. The armour is also earthed for mechanical protection.

The sub DB (30mA RCD) is also a TT system with 10mm earth cable to electrode. (I’ve tested the electrode and it’s at 83 Ohms so well inside the 200 Ohms limit.

The sub board feeds the following in garage and outside:

Outside

32A hot tub via 6mm SWA

16A power radial

6A lighting

Inside garage:
32A ring

6A lighting

I’ve checked all cable runs for voltage drop and current capacity, all fall within BS7671.

The issues I’m unsure of is:

1.The sub DB is taking the PME from main DB, whilst also benefiting from an earth electrode. AFAIK having 2 x systems of earthing may conflict and lead to main DB RCD tripping, and not the sub board, but I could be wrong?

2.The 6mm SWA has a current capacity of 53A (ref method D), with a 32A hot tub and diversity applied to both power and lighting I’m coming in at 36.92A + 32A = 68.92A. In reality the ring circuit in garage is rarely used above a freezer and occasional drill etc. Certainly nothing with a load that would require a ring final circuit for a new instal.

My initial thoughts were to change the ring final to a radial, with diversity applied will be 13A therefore bringing the total to 60.9A but this is still too much. The next choice would be to upgrade the feed SWA to 10mm giving me 71A.

What’s your options on this? And the best way to make things compliment, both for SWA size and earthing issue?

Thanks in advance.
 
Couple of questions:

Is the outbuilding separate from the house, or attached? If separate are there any extraneous conductive parts? (water feed, metal structure, etc)

Is there a particular reason to want to 'make it compliant', or just for your own peace of mind?

There is a useful guide here on exporting PME to a remote building. It's not prohibited in BS7671, though some DNOs forbid it, and even if they don't there are often issues to consider re safety.

It sounds like as it is set up, then the sub DB is not a TT system, it's an exported PME with an additional earth rod (which might in fact become the norm in future regulations as it happens).

That doesn't necessarily cause an issue with RCD tripping - you probably have enough difference between the 100mA at the source and the 30mA at the garage to ensure selectivity, such that the garage trips before the main house.

Is the 100mA at the house end only protecting the SWA, or the whole house as well? Has there ever been problems with it tripping? SWA properly installed wouldn't necessarily need an RCD at the front end, just a suitable MCB.

To make the sub db a TT install, the armour of the feeding SWA would have to be isolated (usually in a plastic glanding box) to ensure it is NOT connected to the sub db or install (plus any core that might be connected as CPC of course).

Given that the sub db feeds a hot tub, making it a TT may well be the way to go - there are some good previous answers on here re hot tub install, as well as a very good video by David Savery on the issues involved...(not necessarily suitable to watch with children or the easily offended around)

Re the final issue with the SWA current capacity, it is likely not a huge issue, but a simple solution if it concerns you would seem to be to fit a 50A MCB at the house end to protect the SWA (Edit - but see response by @Pretty Mouth above first)

In practise, it seems very unlikely that even with a hot tub, you would ever actually pull anything over that in reality. What is the 16A radial feeding?

Given all this is already installed, there is no need necessarily to bring it up to current spec in any case, unless there is anything that is dangerous...

Of all the issues, only the exported PME seems like a possible issue to deal with to me, and in that case only because of the hot tub.
 
Last edited:
1. If the garage earthing is connected to the supply TN-C-S earth, it's not TT. To make it TT, it must be disconnected from that earth so that the garage DB earth bar takes up the earth electrode potential. Otherwise, at 83 ohms, compared to a fraction of an ohm from the TN-C-S, the electrode has negligible influence on the system.

Two systems of earthing can't 'conflict,' merely the one that has lower Ze will dominate and control the potential at the MET. Nor will they have any influence on RCDs, which only measure differential current in L & N. The RCD has no connection to, nor any sense of, the earthing system. The RCD doesn't even 'know' whether there is an earthing system. Historically, in the days of VOELBS which sensed currents in the system CPCs, this situation was more complex and separate earthing systems could interact. But that doesn't apply in any way to RCDs.

What is of interest is whether there is selectivity between the two RCDs. Why is there a 100mA upfront on a TN-C-S?

2. When calculating design loading, the circuit configuration itself is of little account, unless it tells you about the size and usage of the installation. A big house with ten rings is likely to have a higher total load than a small house with two. But if you fit ten rings in the small house, you still only have a small house load, so you can't use the normal diversity values for that case because it's not representative. Likewise If you put a 32A ring in a garage with just a freezer and a few chargers, you still only have a freezer and a few chargers. It matters not whether the circuit is a ring or a radial.

Work out what the load is in reality. Is the hot tub load actually 32A? Read the data plate. Add it to a realistic load from the garage etc. Someone might plug in a heater, it could be 10A for that, 5A for a power tool, 2A for the freezer starting current and 1A for lighting. Or something like that. If the result is under 50A, put a 50A MCB in the main board to protect the cable that has an Iz of 53A, and Bob's your circuit.

BTW worth getting used to working in the correct precision for the job in hand:
I’m coming in at 36.92A + 32A = 68.92A
69.92A means more than 68.915A but less than 69.925A. Those four sig fig are implying you know the result to within 10mA, when in reality it's probably wrong by 20A. I'd write 69A, but think 'around 70A.'

Simulpost with Dartlec making a lot of the same points.
 
Last edited:
I’ve checked all cable runs for voltage drop and current capacity, all fall within BS7671.

No they don't, you've got 6mm protected by a 63A MCB, that's almost certainly not compliant.
The sub DB is taking the PME from main DB, whilst also benefiting from an earth electrode. AFAIK having 2 x systems of earthing may conflict and lead to main DB RCD tripping, and not the sub board, but I could be wrong?
With the submain CPC connected at the second DB you don't have 2 systems of earthing, you only have one, TNCS, it just happens to have an earth electrode connected within the installation.

Regardless of what is done with the earthing the RCD at the first DB may trip on faults at the second DB, RCDs work on current imbalance.

My initial thoughts were to change the ring final to a radial, with diversity applied will be 13A therefore bringing the total to 60.9A but this is still too much.
Changing the ring to a radial will achieve nothing, the load won't change.

What’s your options on this? And the best way to make things compliment, both for SWA size and earthing issue?

Two options for dealing with the cable size issue are either a bigger cable or a smaller OCPD.

What earthing issue do you have? Is there any reason why you would need to second DB to have its own seperate TT earthing system?
 
I don't believe this to be true @Dartlec, I believe this is a (rather persistent) myth .

I have it in writing from 3 DNOs (every one that I have contacted so far) that they have no special requirements regarding earthing arrangements at outbuildings.
Which 3 out of interest?

It may well be a myth - or there might be one somewhere, since it always seems to come up in articles/guides on the issue.

Of course, if something were to happen and the HSE were involved, they might claim something different in that specific case, so it's good to have it in writing.

I guess it would come down to what risk assessment was done at time of install.
 
though some DNOs forbid it, and even if they don't there are often issues to consider re safety.

No they don't forbid it, they just expect you to do it in a safe and compliant manner.

DNO's will not supply a TNCS earth connection to various types of installation due to the possible dangers, but the average garden building isn't on that list.
 
Which 3 out of interest?

It may well be a myth - or there might be one somewhere, since it always seems to come up in articles/guides on the issue.

Of course, if something were to happen and the HSE were involved, they might claim something different in that specific case, so it's good to have it in writing.

I guess it would come down to what risk assessment was done at time of install.
WPD, UKPN, and Electricity North West.

I contacted them after a discussion on a FB group where someone claimed that UKPN told him on several occasions that they prohibited exporting the TN-C-S earth to outbuildings such as garages, sheds etc. I suspected he wasn't telling the truth, so I both phoned and emailed UKPN, and it turns out he was indeed talking out of his other mouth.

I intend to contact the other DNOs on the matter so that I can say 100% one way or the other. I'll post all their respones in a thread when I do
 
I don't believe this to be true @Dartlec, I believe this is a (rather persistent) myth .

I have it in writing from 3 DNOs (every one that I have contacted so far) that they have no special requirements regarding earthing arrangements at outbuildings.
We do have to remember though that bs7671 forbids the use of pme earthing for some types of installations.
 
Thank you everyone for your input, it’s much appreciated. I will respond later on with a proposal to remedy the situation based on your feedback and my research on points you’ve made (I’d rather learn from this by getting the books out too)
 
Your point is...?
You said, "I have it in writing from 3 DNOs (every one that I have contacted so far) that they have no special requirements regarding earthing arrangements at outbuildings."



Because a diyer/trainee reading that statement may well believe that they can export pme to any outbuilding without any special requirements, which isn't true.
 
Last edited:
I have it in writing from 3 DNOs (every one that I have contacted so far) that they have no special requirements regarding earthing arrangements at outbuildings
how many faults per year on pme lost neutral very little the power lines are monitored ,you have got more chances of being kissed on the lips of a giraffe 🦒.
 
Because a diyer/trainee reading that statement may well believe that they can export pme to any outbuilding without any special requirements, which isn't true.

They, or anyone else, cannot 'export' PME to any outbuilding. They can however extend an PME equipotential zone to any outbuilding (except those falling under specific circumstances)
 
They, or anyone else, cannot 'export' PME to any outbuilding. They can however extend an PME equipotential zone to any outbuilding (except those falling under specific circumstances)

There’s no regulation that says you can’t export a PME earth to another building.
 
There’s no regulation that says you can’t export a PME earth to another building.
I think a lot of the confusion surrounding this comes from the word 'export'. It only crops up in these conversations, and doesn't seem to exist in any set of regulations that I'm aware of.

What does it mean? Does it mean extending the separated earth, from the MET, to the outbuilding (generally acceptable), or does it mean extending the combined neutral/earth to the outbuilding (not acceptable)? DNOs almost certainly will tell you that you can't do the latter.
 
What is of interest is whether there is selectivity between the two RCDs. Why is there a 100mA upfront on a TN-C-S?
I was wondering about that.

Certainly you could use a 100mA delay RCD along with something like a 50A D-curve MCB to get better selectivity with down-stream OCPD based faults and/or still meeting disconnection times on the higher resistance SWA armour to save cost going 3C.

I suspect it might just have been TT originally and in recent years the DNO made it TN-C-S?
 
how many faults per year on pme lost neutral very little the power lines are monitored ,you have got more chances of being kissed on the lips of a giraffe 🦒.
I'd like to know this too - wonder if anyone has collated such events via FOI request or similar. Since it is regularly raised as a potential risk in guides etc, I'd like to know just how often it happens so that I can make a well informed risk assessment on certain types of job.

(For avoidance of doubt, I'm talking about faults on PME, not being kissed by a giraffe 😉 )
 
I'd like to know this too - wonder if anyone has collated such events via FOI request or similar. Since it is regularly raised as a potential risk in guides etc, I'd like to know just how often it happens so that I can make a well informed risk assessment on certain types of job.
Available data getting a bit old now....
1661858442823.png



Interestingly someone tried an FOI request in Nov 2021 and HSE never responded, leading to the ICO upholding a complaint.
I can't find the results though.
 
I looked at a few of these posts then skipped to the end. Take no notice of the majority of these as they just seem as though they like to argue rather than knowing what there doing. Exporting a TNCS is fine as long as you can prove and are happy it's OK. A 100mA RCD can trip before the 30mA at x5, it shouldn't but it can. To stop this you can install a separate isolator at the mains so it doesn't come from the board in the house then run the SWA to the shed from that. Your running a sub main not a finale circuit so it does not need protecting by an RCD. If you still want the shed to be TT then terminate the SWA into a plastic adaptable box then run the correct sized earth from the stake to the shed DB.
 
default said : " Take no notice of the majority of these as they just seem as though they like to argue rather than knowing what there doing. "

But do you know what you're doing? Because I think what you're suggesting wouldn't be compliant.
 
Last edited:
The post in the beginning was referring to A TNcs in the main property, but TT to the outer building asking what should be.
Exporting a TNcs is fine has long has their is no extraneous metel work in the outer building and if so then a either bond back or TT it
 
@default has the right kind of idea but the wording is a little suspect. Let me adjust it a bit:
To stop this you can install a separate isolator split the tails and used a suitably sized switched fuse at the mains so it doesn't come from the board in the house then run the SWA to the shed from that. Your running a sub main not a finale circuit As the SWA cable has an earthed metal covering it does not need protecting by an RCD for Impact Protection purposes, though may for fault protection.
 
The post in the beginning was referring to A TNcs in the main property, but TT to the outer building asking what should be.
Exporting a TNcs is fine has long has their is no extraneous metel work in the outer building and if so then a either bond back or TT it
You can still export a TNCS to a shed if there is metal work in it. This shed is not a special location.
 
Explain why you think this.
Tim at post #33

Exporting a PME earth isn't as simple as you suggest, as there will be a number of factors that have to be taken into account, depending on its use.
You wouldn't want to be running a 16mm 3 core swa to a customers wooden potting shed that is 2mtrs away, has no extraneous earths and has just one lighting point.

On the other hand, you wouldn't want to export to a cattle shed.




 
Last edited:
Pretty mouth at Post #34

Exporting a PME earth isn't as simple as you suggest, as there will be a number of factors that have to be taken into account, depending on its use.
You wouldn't want to be running a 16mm 3 core swa to a customers wooden potting shed that is 2mtrs away, has no extraneous earths and has just one lighting point.


The original post said nothing about specific factors. So unless it's a metal container, swimming pool, caravan or some other type of special location there are no regs saying it can not be exported.
 
The original post said nothing about specific factors. So unless it's a metal container, swimming pool, caravan or some other type of special location there are no regs saying it can not be exported.
Nobody said any different.
 
It has already been mentioned on here that you are not 'EXPORTING' TN-C-S you are utilising a cpc derived from a TN-C-S earthing system.
 
Another misworded publication. The schemes actively promote the term 'exporting'.
 
Tim at post #33

Exporting a PME earth isn't as simple as you suggest, as there will be a number of factors that have to be taken into account, depending on its use.
You wouldn't want to be running a 16mm 3 core swa to a customers wooden potting shed that is 2mtrs away, has no extraneous earths and has just one lighting point.

On the other hand, you wouldn't want to export to a cattle shed.




Not saying you would, but you could.
 
Maybe but to export it you would have to do exactly that. The fact that you could have a 'special location' downstream in some cases may not be relevant. I could have a bathroom in this downstream location but could still employ the TN-C-S derived earth.
 
Maybe but to export it you would have to do exactly that. The fact that you could have a 'special location' downstream in some cases may not be relevant. I could have a bathroom in this downstream location but could still employ the TN-C-S derived earth.
Having a bathroom on a TNCS is fine as long as you keep to the regs but there are some special locations where a TNCS can not be used.
 

Reply to Assistance with my installation in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi, if getting back to the CU is not an option, instead of spurring off a socket via a Sfs putting the rating down to 13a. Could you spur off the...
Replies
43
Views
2K
Was having a poke around the old man's house today. Anyway. DB is under stairs (18th ed following a recent extension. Not done by me but it's...
Replies
7
Views
768
Hi all, Merry Christmas to everyone, and apologies for talking work during the holidays😅 I have my first EV charger install job early in the New...
Replies
14
Views
2K
The earthing arrangement where the hot tub will be installed is formed in the TN-C-S system. I want to install the sub-main distribution circuit...
Replies
18
Views
2K
Hi there, long time lurker, first time poster here. Straight down to it.. A friend asked me to add some sockets and additional lights to a small...
Replies
0
Views
918

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock