OP
Engineer54
Andy,....
Ah .... but it's clearly stated in his report ...No bonding connections!! lol!!!
Ah .... but it's clearly stated in his report ...No bonding connections!! lol!!!
Discuss Comments advice on report after having Electrical inspection in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net
Andy,....
Ah .... but it's clearly stated in his report ...No bonding connections!! lol!!!
Is he a member of a scheme, NAPIT nic or elecsa?
That makes it a bit harder then.
Do any of your light fittings req an earth,are they metalic,those may req earth
Even if they are,there are set procedures that can be used, if you were to decline rewiring of the lighting
all of my light switches are plastic - so what is the benefit of me spending 800 (going on quote I have) to get them earthed properly? if they are plastic surely not really a chance of shock - what are the benefits etc etc? just really trying to understand why I need to do it
Thanks
thanks for replySeen as it's a bungalow there is another option to a full circuit rewire, If there are conduit drops to the switches you could just drop in a cpc around the lighting circuit.
Or
Change all class 1 lighting points to class 2 & replace all metal plate screws with nylon ones.
Nobody else has asked, the cables for the lighting circuit wouldnt be enclosed in metal conduit would they? if so you electrician may have missed this as the cpc.
As for the prices:
Your cu change seems fair & I'd insist that (seen as you only have a few circuits) rcbo's were used.
Lighting rewire, bit ott for a bungalow. Could be cheaper.
MEB again without looking hard to say, but I usualy put a price of £150 on this as in most cases it isnt too much of a F about.
As for your mums quote:
Cant comment unless the quote is broken down.
The reports, well everybody else has pulled them apart enough already.
and they are?
did you see also on there polarity was ticked on garage sockets ? though it was reversed.
I think he may have ticked the polarity box because, he has commented and noted that remedial work was done to fix that problem
As reports go,I have seen a lot worse than this one
Ranting time now
Because these reports are not regulated in any shape or form it is just a consequence of a crap system
Clients can go to all singing + dancing approved contrators and get the same toilet papers
The control or lack of it is at fault more than the maker of the report
No control on who can carry them out
No control on competence for doing so
The clients are being hoodwinked on an enormous scale,but most think if they were to go with advise out there and get even an niceic approved firm,they would be getting the real deal
How wrong they are and how ill informed
The guy did the job the way he "thought" was correct,should all the blame be put on him ?
Any incompetent is only incompetent if they know it and our system encourages that situation
Well said Des56: I have extensive experience in inspection & testing and of certification also, and I have found myself banging my head of a brick wall with frustration at the lack of regulation across the industry! I have even been forced to call Brian Scaddan about the finer points of inspection & testing only to find that he was also shocked at what goes on out there!!! I have refused to sign off NEW installations due to the shoddy and non-compliance installs only to find that there is always some mug(usually a manager) who will sign off anything knowing fine well there is practically NO chance of ever being pulled up!!! IT'S ALL A BIG MONEY MAKING SCAM!!!
It also ****** me off at the amount of training courses and cards I've had to continually put myself through just to be classed as having basic qualifications to do this!!! I know no longer work in the SJIB/JIB sector but now work as a wireman/electrician/fitter in the HV sector for Scottish Power doing sub-station work, as I was sick of all the **** going on!!! That doesn't mean that the HV game is any different, just a change of scenery.
for the £800 to do the lighting circuit - he has expanded and says "I had intended to install 2 lighting circuits toavoid inconvenience in case of a fault. I had also thoughtabout putting the immersion heater on a separate circuit from the sockets,this would not take long, it would again avoid inconvenience should afault occur and also prevent overload" - just to provide all information for comment
Thing is Malc, he has made far too many mistakes on those 2 PIRs!! (If they are just mistakes) What do you do, just ignore these points, and let the OP fend for himself?? Or do we give the OP the information he needs to get his installation rectified correctly and safely at a reasonably cost effective price??I wonder if this sparks that is getting ripped apart is forum member .............. I bet he now knows what the Christians felt like 2500 years ago, if he is.
I wonder if this sparks that is getting ripped apart is forum member .............. I bet he now knows what the Christians felt like 2500 years ago, if he is.
talking of which, malcolm. when's the next crucifixion/beheading in saudi?I wonder if this sparks that is getting ripped apart is forum member .............. I bet he now knows what the Christians felt like 2500 years ago, if he is.
hmmm. came across a job the other week. TN-S with an earth rod as well. think i got a reading of around 0.25ohms.
So you now tell us there is an immersion connected to the ring? Why is this not detailed on the PIR and given a code 4 (arguably a code 2 since there is only one ring, especially if this is your primary means of hot water)?
this needs fixing with it's own circuit. Probably less than half a day. If he was intending to do this, it really should be detailed on the PIR and quote.
At this age of property, it's also likely the immersion has no safety cut out - this is a code 2 and a new stat should be fitted (see the guides linked below)
I queried this and he made a mistake and has sent me an amended report with just electode tickedWith the reading of that low id have expected it to be a TNCS ,so as ive pointed out in a previouse post he has ticked both Earth rod and suppliers earth so it could be a TNCS with a Rod as has been mentioned , an old TT system that has been upgraded to TNCS and earth rod never removed , or the earth from the immersion etc causing incorrect readings , as i have said we all make mistakes ,but in correct main switch nos RCD values ,cpc sizes when there isnt one mmm way to many 1 or even 2 may be
35mA RCD is my favourite.....
I would like to know where its installed as the schedual say's its on the ring main (Sockets)as its been tested but the observations say they have no RCD protection
I do think its about time we stopped pulling the guy apart though feel sorry for him think if he's not on the forum he should be not so we can rib him but to help him and try to point him in the direction so he doesnt make any more mistakes , sound like a young inexperiance guy to me , we all need help from time to time i know i do (wife say so any way ) lol
Reply to Comments advice on report after having Electrical inspection in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.