O
Octopus
deleted
Discuss Bonding to Gas and water am2 in the The Welcome Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
Guidance note 8 (earthing & bonding) page 57.
Thanks not got GN 8 does it say anything about seperate conductors being no compliant? because I think the post saying it is, and a single conductor is the best practice is incorrect.Section 54
It is not nonsense, protective conductors have got to be continuous.
It is up to you if you want to use one conductor for water and another conductor for gas but continuity is key no breaks at all.
Guidance note 8 (earthing & bonding) page 57.
Thanks not got GN 8 does it say anything about separate conductors being no compliant? because I think the post saying it is, and a single conductor is the best practice is incorrect.
Hit, nail and head and rather proves my point I think.
I would have thought that you would have it Pete!
Thanks Telthere is no reg. stating that a single bonding conductor to 2 services should be continuous. it's just been accepted as good practice for the reason i stated in post #5.
You can argue as much as you want and dismiss advice here.Right - this isn't a reg, its guidance
Most people don't have the Guidance Notes ......
If the IET intended this to be a reg it would be in the big book
Reply to Bonding to Gas and water am2 in the The Welcome Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.