Search the forum,

Discuss Concerning R1 + R2 and r1,rn,r2 ring final results ? in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Soulsurfer

-
Arms
Reaction score
143
Hi all,
Can anyone shed any light on some strange really low readings on a ring final circuit I've just 2nd fixed including replacing some legs as the IR was bad in places on old cabling before.

Thought it could be my MFT batteries going and therefore giving possibility of silly results but upon getting home I tested a part used drum of 1.5mm T & E and got good results ! I'm new to doing my own testing so am a bit baffled. Drum I tested I estimate at 60-70 metres or so left on maybe a touch more but can't find my OSG to look up the resistance per metre of 1.5 Twin, readings were L-E 1.43 ohms, N-E 1.49 ohms, and L-N 1.15 ohms which looked reasonable whereas on the ring r1 was 0.00 ohms, rn also 0.00 ohms and r2 0.16 ohms !! Thinking something silly has been overlooked here ? R1 + R2 tested at almost certainly furthest point too and had 0.00 ohms there too ?? Have two sockets wired as spurs too and no difference there either ! I expected higher resistance readings on them.

Half hoping that due to being up best part of week these nights with poorly 5 yr old my brain has overlooked a fundamental mess up !
 
Hey Dave, I actually forgot to post that I read exactly that and also batteries on the decline on the Fluke giving spurious readings and the batteries are low'ish showing on self test at 7.2V and should be 9V when new batteries in it. But by testing the drum of 1.5mm I thought if batteries I'd still get 0.00 or near, but I actually got a reading as above that looked o.k.

I did null leads using the zero function and via deducting the read resistance myself to make sure, Croc clips together and by using the little fluke zero adapter that was in the case ! ( piece of pricey metal !! lol )

and usually once zeroed / nulled it's retained as zero but this time / a few times it read 0.07 ohms say, then after showed random 0.3 ohms on display etc.. or such like but when continuity tested was reading leads at zero ! so seemed o.k. so tried zero / null button again and get a different reading each time on leads and then instead of 0.0 on screen would show random still results ! weird that. It's a 1653B in case that makes any odds and has been brilliant and calibrated 2 months ago.
 
Have you tried it with another set of leads.
I am not familiar with fluke , but leads can be worky tickets.
 
I'm sorry I must not of read post properly , I did not see were you had done IR testing .
If leads were faulty it would show through the ranges.
 
I'm sorry I must not of read post properly , I did not see were you had done IR testing .
If leads were faulty it would show through the ranges.
No apology required buddy, I never mentioned that I had done IR tests or similar, only listed the r1 rn etc.. at first, just thought even though basic stuff that I may have made a huge fowl up somehow.
 
As I said , I am not familiar with MFT's. I use Megger separates. I had a similar problem with a faulty lead; and a bad contact on the batteries.
 
As it has already been mentioned, it sounds like faulty leads. I had a similar problem last year with mine and a new set sorted the problem.

My leads were intermittently faulty, which I discovered when I compared them to my mate's leads (same make leads) on my tester
 
Hi all,
Can anyone shed any light on some strange really low readings on a ring final circuit I've just 2nd fixed including replacing some legs as the IR was bad in places on old cabling before.

Thought it could be my MFT batteries going and therefore giving possibility of silly results but upon getting home I tested a part used drum of 1.5mm T & E and got good results ! I'm new to doing my own testing so am a bit baffled. Drum I tested I estimate at 60-70 metres or so left on maybe a touch more but can't find my OSG to look up the resistance per metre of 1.5 Twin, readings were L-E 1.43 ohms, N-E 1.49 ohms, and L-N 1.15 ohms which looked reasonable whereas on the ring r1 was 0.00 ohms, rn also 0.00 ohms and r2 0.16 ohms !! Thinking something silly has been overlooked here ? R1 + R2 tested at almost certainly furthest point too and had 0.00 ohms there too ?? Have two sockets wired as spurs too and no difference there either ! I expected higher resistance readings on them.

Half hoping that due to being up best part of week these nights with poorly 5 yr old my brain has overlooked a fundamental mess up !


Appendix I Page 190
 
Hey all, not been back to the install yet but did a different place today and got new batteries, tried different leads and another tester too and both gave same results on a number of tests as my MFT did on old batteries and leads old & new read the same !

Thats made it seem even stranger now, prob back to site on Sunday and will go over test again !
 
Forget my jokes,

just when u said in original post you got r1 0.00 rn 0.00 but r2 0.16

suggests open circuit, no loop

isit possible cables mixed up somehow
 
That's exactly what blew me away first time as the readings were as if there was no resistance on the entire circuit, definitely ring as quite a few legs were removed along with old JB's as the IR as installing new cabling was 0.77 Megohms on the lounge, hall & bedrooms x 2 ring final cct. Replaced legs as client did not want a rewire in entirety and IR was all at >500Mohms after replacing old legs, also tested each leg before and after to identify if perfect IR before testing from CU ( also replaced ) at the end. This is when I had very low / perfect ( although not feasible ) r1, etc.. But yet Zs was ok !
 
Rough estimate entire ring circuit approx 35 metres including 2 x sockets ( one each bedroom ) wired as spurs although still not got some resistance. Will need to check OSG tomorrow and total up resistance value as wont be much on 35 metres or so of 2.5/1.5 twin.
 
Update: today while finishing the whole job I got great results ! r1 0.41, rn 0.43, r2 0.78 & R1+R2 0.35 with Zs at 0.79 slightly above calculated Zs but well within 1.1 ohms Zs allowable so really happy
and just completed the certs now !

time to get paid and same guy just bought another house to fix up from ground up 3 storey and put in planning for another property new build too ! No rest for me then... You're all legends for your help guys and if ever you're in Jersey I'll get the beers in.
 
Ha ha good stuff, Yep can't have been that long ago then ? Kitty's is quite a recent addition. Chambers is a half decent water hole too. Did you find The Blind Pig - Speakeasy ?
 
Ha ha good stuff, Yep can't have been that long ago then ? Kitty's is quite a recent addition. Chambers is a half decent water hole too. Did you find The Blind Pig - Speakeasy ?

LOL. I was in Jersey full time from November 2010 until August 2011. (I even have a States of Jersey Health Card!)

It was around the time that Jager Bombs made an appearance. I had planned on applying for another job there when I left. Actually I miss the place a lot.

I can't think of the Blind Pig off the top of my head but I'm sure I probably was in it!
 
Last edited:
Classic ;-) The blind pig wouldn't have been open back then, it's very exclusive, hidden doorway somewhere in Chambers ! Special knock to gain access too. Only take around 12 people or so at a time ! You working alone or for a local company then chief ? Should come back for the sun, everyone is getting too busy at the moment.
 
You working alone or for a local company then chief ? Should come back for the sun, everyone is getting too busy at the moment.

I was working for a company called Midland Engineering. They were working on the Portelet Bay site for Dandara (a name you daren't mention in Jersey!). Midland Engineering were an Irish company who setup a Jersey subsidiary. (I was employed under a Jersey contract of employment.) They left in a string of bad debt. In fact they still owe me over £1,000!

I would love to go back to Jersey.
 
Ahh I remember midland engineering ! along with Mitie they made a few messy ones too and disappeared quickly off the rock too!! Grand hotel was a beauty, spent many an hour tracing out Mitsy VRV faults through the BMS computers as the units were addressed wrongly to the point the condensers were firing liquid refrigerant to fan coils in bedrooms that didn't exist due to being ghost units !! Beautiful ! Oh and Dandara !! hahahahahaha yes well that takes things to a whole new low. Worked on a few of there projects if you like for my old boss Joe Walsh big Irish fella at ATC & Son Electrical contractors and saw some wonderful sights on there sites....
 
Update: today while finishing the whole job I got great results ! r1 0.41, rn 0.43, r2 0.78 & R1+R2 0.35 with Zs at 0.79 slightly above calculated Zs but well within 1.1 ohms Zs allowable so really happy
and just completed the certs now !
Whilst these results compare with tabulated figures (which I compared with an NIC publication), I would be concerned about the results you got in your OP and trial testing with the 1.5mm cable.

See you say your MFT was calibrated 2 months ago, how is your MFT comparing with your monthly checks? Cant see how the dead short end to end measurements can be apportioned with the house wiring.

My MFT a while back was displaying fluctuating figures, and it was actually a faulty socket in the MFT, and had to be repaired. You may have an intermittent fault with your MFT.
 
Tried it on the calcard a few times and was pretty much bang on and been ok at my house too but only since new batteries in too, they were only a volt or so higher but hopefully not the MFT ! That would be a nightmare.
 

Reply to Concerning R1 + R2 and r1,rn,r2 ring final results ? in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Please advise what I should test / check next. My usual qualified electrician who did all of the work here is in Ireland for 4 weeks and not...
Replies
45
Views
3K
After fixing a few CPC related issues on a ring final I got the following results L-L = 0.47 N-N = 0.47 CPC-CPC = 0.69 R1+R2 Tested at 0.31...
Replies
3
Views
1K
Hi so i am doing a test on sockets on a ring Final circuit for family member. Got my end to ends r1 0.62, rn 0.64, r2 0.97, identified opposite...
Replies
3
Views
2K
Hi guys. Having a weird problem in a house that has suddenly happened. One half of the ring main has 240ish volts (fluctuates of course), and...
Replies
9
Views
519
Evening everyone, I was taught when carrying out Zs testing to test both L-PE and L-N and record the highest result of the two tests for my Zs...
Replies
11
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock