Discuss Eicr,I never like these in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
A flush metal box is fine when you take the screws out of any switch, socket etc the connections are exposed the recess metal box is the enclosureWhat would be classed as a suitable enclosure for these type of fittings? I have previously stated that i always flush a small metal architrave box in the wall to put the connections in for lights of this type but as soon as the fixing screws are taken out then any connection is always going to be exposed anyway.
I suppose maybe its all about how the connections sit against the wall and what type of wall it is etc. Also the fact that you could get rogue strands of cable sticking out of connectors wouldn't help being very close to the fitting.
I still see it a lot of the time now its still commonSo would it ever be acceptable to say that the fitting itself is the enclosure for these connections? I only ask this because when i was an apprentice in the 80's (gulp) the electricians i worked with nearly always just tucked the connections behind fittings of this type.
Maybe it was just different thinking then.
The Wago 224 are ideal for this sort of thing. Used some in similar situation where there was barely any earth left (had been cut short) though in this case there was a metal architrave box or similar in the wall.Personally I would replace those connectors with wagos (other makes available).
Ok, still not happy with it though, so what code.Rough perhaps, but I think it may be okay, and compliant. Here is why:
526.5
Every termination and joint in a live conductor or a PEN conductor shall be made within one of the following or a combination thereof:
(i) A suitable accessory complying with the appropriate product standard
(ii) An equipment enclosure complying with the appropriate product standard
(iii) An enclosure partially formed or completed with building material which is non-combustible when tested to BS 476-4.
I know precisely nothing about BS 476-4, but I find it difficult to imagine that brickwork, plaster, plasterboard etc would be deemed combustible when tested to any standard.
Yea,definitely be better but hiding them behind a old fashioned wall light would be not easy.The Wago 224 are ideal for this sort of thing. Used some in similar situation where there was barely any earth left (had been cut short) though in this case there was a metal architrave box or similar in the wall.
What code do you think something that complies with the regulations attracts?Ok, still not happy with it though, so what code.
Still code 2 for me,it’s definitely not correct ,still needs a enclosure,pattresss.What code do you think something that complies with the regulations attracts?
If unsheathed cables were visible outside the enclosure once on I'd agree C2, but for the sake of argument is this any different from most of the metal decorative light fittings that come with a single bar that connects to the ceiling - they have no 'back' other than that provided by the plasterboard, yet the cabling within is usually not sheathed or in a separate enclosure (apart from the IP rated ones which are those hideous tiny ones)Still code 2 for me,it’s definitely not correct ,still needs a enclosure,pattresss.
Rough perhaps, but I think it may be okay, and compliant. Here is why:
526.5
Every termination and joint in a live conductor or a PEN conductor shall be made within one of the following or a combination thereof:
(i) A suitable accessory complying with the appropriate product standard
(ii) An equipment enclosure complying with the appropriate product standard
(iii) An enclosure partially formed or completed with building material which is non-combustible when tested to BS 476-4.
I know precisely nothing about BS 476-4, but I find it difficult to imagine that brickwork, plaster, plasterboard etc would be deemed combustible when tested to any standard.
What’s your thoughts on this,codes etc.
Quite a lot if these,on wall lights & chain hanging lanterns.
It needs some enclosure sure, but it was ok 20 years ago,& no probs.
C2 - potentially dangerous. How so?Still code 2 for me,it’s definitely not correct ,still needs a enclosure,pattresss.
These are ok, but I always worry that I might accidentally release the conductors when cramming them into whatever is enclosing them. I prefer the lever 221s myself.The Wago 224 are ideal for this sort of thing. Used some in similar situation where there was barely any earth left (had been cut short) though in this case there was a metal architrave box or similar in the wall.
These are ok, but I always worry that I might accidentally release the conductors when cramming them into whatever is enclosing them. I prefer the lever 221s myself.
If the wall light is a metallic class 2 one, then I'd agree, the terminations would need to be in one of those supplied tiny plastic boxes to insulated them from the metal casing. But looking at your picture it appears to be earthed, so I'm assuming class 1? In which case I don't see any problem with the connections being made in the base (again I'm assuming a hollow metallic base).all cabling needs to be connected in appropriate enclosure,the wall light is not an enclosure.
Single insulated cable outside of an enclosure, according to NAPIT codebreakers its a C2 and I totally agree.
Almost certainly. Many light fittings with a hollow base have a connector block fixed in their base, the centre terminal connected to a tab earthing the fitting. Where else are you going to make the connection?would the light fitting itself form an enclosure thou ...?
The three paragraphs you have selected from BPG4 wouldn't apply in the case of your original post because:Code 2,says it all really.
[automerge]1601191955[/automerge]
Another one bites the dust ?
Could be potentially dangerous,& definitely a fire hazard.The three paragraphs you have selected from BPG4 wouldn't apply in the case of your original post because:
1. Single insulated conductors are not accessible to touch or likely to come into contact with metalwork
2. Connections are made within an enclosure according to BS7671. Read carefully the regulation I posted at #11
3. No fire barrier has been breached
With this in mind, please explain how you think this is a C2 - potentially dangerous?
Please can you qualify that statement with some kind of explanation? How is it potentially dangerous? What is the increased risk of installing this way? How is there an increased risk of fire over other common installation methods? Please explain.Could be potentially dangerous,& definitely a fire hazard.
Not the best connection.Please can you qualify that statement with some kind of explanation? How is it potentially dangerous? What is the increased risk of installing this way? How is there an increased risk of fire over other common installation methods? Please explain.
Certainly not more of a fire hazard than on a plasterboard ceiling imo, and most modern Class 1 lights use the ceiling as part of their enclosure so presumably they feel it's sufficient.Is that on a brick wall? If so it’s not a fire rest is it?
Not the best connection.
No actually fire barrier,
the connections can be seen,when light is refixed.
Failure of earth connection @ light, danger of live @ fitting,causing shock hazard to persons.
Not the best connection.
No actually fire barrier,the connections can be seen,when light is refixed.
Failure of earth connection @ light, danger of live @ fitting,causing shock hazard to persons.
[automerge]1601227658[/automerge]
How can anyone actually say this is ok, it’s like going back to the bad old days.
Would anyone just leave it like this,C2 .
You funny man.Cliff I don't think EICRs are really your bag.
I’m sorry mate. If the light is fixed back and connections are enclosed, it’s not a fire risk and it’s not a shock risk C3 at best, and that probably been harsh. If a metal fitting isn’t earthed then that’s a C2. If you can get your finger to the connections it’s a C1.You funny man.
My conscience is still intact,& still C2
Ok,down to interpretation,opinion & experience.I’m sorry mate. If the light is fixed back and connections are enclosed, it’s not a fire risk and it’s not a shock risk C3 at best, and that probably been harsh. If a metal fitting isn’t earthed then that’s a C2. If you can get your finger to the connections it’s a C1.
Ideally this should have a metal architrave box behind it, that would be good practice. All you are seeing is bad practice.
At the end of the day it’s your call, how will you carry out works to rectify this c2 if you win the remedial works just out of interest?Ok,down to interpretation,opinion & experience.
Its my report my interpretation,my conscience,I’m sticking.
Thanks all for your comments all taken on board.
That’s a very good question.At the end of the day it’s your call, how will you carry out works to rectify this c2 if you win the remedial works just out of interest?
You can’t tell the client to get new fittings at their expense for a made up C2 ?. Put some flush boxes in.That’s a very good question.
Maybe tell the client to get fittings that are appropriate, or flush suitable boxes/enclosures into the walls.
Reply to Eicr,I never like these in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.