Discuss RCD splitting question in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

I suggest you read the original OPs post, No where in that post, did it talk about granny flats, annexes, or flats, You did that!! I read the post as it was described, and i related to it, and that was as ....'A House Extension'' .

Now unless we are talking about a rather large sprawling house, there will never be a need for having 2 CUs in remote separate locations. 2 CUs Yes maybe, ...one for off peak heating tariff's, or as a means of increasing the number of circuits. But again both located at a common position.


So let me say this again, albeit a little modified to suit yourself, ''The use of 2 remotely separated CUs in a standard sized single dwelling house is a nonsense!!!'' And that is not misleading, nor is it wrong!!!
Your original posts at the start of this thread(before there was any notion of the extent of the extended property,or it's intended use) inferred that a second remote DB in a single dwelling is never acceptable and even a cowboy practice....that is absolute rubbish and it is that I took issue with.There are instances where a separate DB would be a better installation method than running multiple final circuits a long distance to a main DB,some of those instances have already been acknowledged,others come to mind.
In the part of your quote highlighted you have suddenly inserted "standard sized"....where was this when your original posts were stating that a second CU is never acceptable?.....you were as unaware as I was of all the facts,that is why my first post asked for more info before answers could be given....
 
Your original posts at the start of this thread(before there was any notion of the extent of the extended property,or it's intended use) inferred that a second remote DB in a single dwelling is never acceptable and even a cowboy practice....that is absolute rubbish and it is that I took issue with.There are instances where a separate DB would be a better installation method than running multiple final circuits a long distance to a main DB,some of those instances have already been acknowledged,others come to mind.
In the part of your quote highlighted you have suddenly inserted "standard sized"....where was this when your original posts were stating that a second CU is never acceptable?.....you were as unaware as I was of all the facts,that is why my first post asked for more info before answers could be given....


It's pointless going on and on about this, i think it's been thrashed out enough now....
All i as trying to point out in my last post was that i always understood, that the OPs original post was an extension and nothing more, and that is what i commented on, in my original post.
I didn't suddenly insert ''Standard'', ... as i stated that was to satisfy your side of the argument.
 
The 16mm in question is a 30m run straight through joists 400m apart .SWA would have been a bit of a chew.
I can't see the problem,if its labeled up,how the distribution layout should be a concern.
Anyway if I change the CU for a dual RCD board and come from a way that's 80a 30ms protected and feed my new board that has 5 circuits,how do I allow for division of circuits at my new board?
For those who are thinking lack of competence,would I be ***** to sit here on a saturday night fishing for the answer with a missus pestering for some romance............?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The 16mm in question is a 30m run straight through joists 400m apart .SWA would have been a bit of a chew.
I can't see the problem,if its labeled up,how the distribution layout should be a concern.
Anyway if I change the CU for a dual RCD board and come from a way that's 80a 30ms protected and feed my new board that has 5 circuits,how do I allow for division of circuits at my new board?
For those who are thinking lack of competence,would I be ***** to sit here on a saturday night fishing for the answer with a missus pestering for some romance............?

Why are you here if you have the option of the jump??

U mad??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
She's just made me watch the ****est film i have ever seen.....Valentines Day!
Obviously, it's now time for some punishment............:p
 

Reply to RCD splitting question in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

As I've mainly done site work and moved into domestic recently, I'm a bit rusty on stuff like this, but if I'm adding a loft PIV unit to an...
Replies
1
Views
643
Hi All I'm new here. I have just finished my NVQ and waiting to do my AM2. I have a question on selectivity as it has always slightly confused me...
Replies
5
Views
760
Cant get my head round this :( I understand N-E faults cause RCD's to trip, but I cant understand why on these 2 occasions, googled allover but...
Replies
13
Views
1K
Hi, just looking for advice. Ive been to look at a Fire alarm install job. While checking where i will take my supply from. 3 phase sub board, i...
Replies
20
Views
1K
I'm obviously still new and learning about what I can and cannot do, but essentially I want to install an EVSE at my own house for an electric...
Replies
8
Views
553

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock