OP
Engineer54
Haha!!... I don't normally ''Hint'' about anything!!... Well so i've been told ...lol!!
Discuss RCD splitting question in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net
Your original posts at the start of this thread(before there was any notion of the extent of the extended property,or it's intended use) inferred that a second remote DB in a single dwelling is never acceptable and even a cowboy practice....that is absolute rubbish and it is that I took issue with.There are instances where a separate DB would be a better installation method than running multiple final circuits a long distance to a main DB,some of those instances have already been acknowledged,others come to mind.I suggest you read the original OPs post, No where in that post, did it talk about granny flats, annexes, or flats, You did that!! I read the post as it was described, and i related to it, and that was as ....'A House Extension'' .
Now unless we are talking about a rather large sprawling house, there will never be a need for having 2 CUs in remote separate locations. 2 CUs Yes maybe, ...one for off peak heating tariff's, or as a means of increasing the number of circuits. But again both located at a common position.
So let me say this again, albeit a little modified to suit yourself, ''The use of 2 remotely separated CUs in a standard sized single dwelling house is a nonsense!!!'' And that is not misleading, nor is it wrong!!!
Your original posts at the start of this thread(before there was any notion of the extent of the extended property,or it's intended use) inferred that a second remote DB in a single dwelling is never acceptable and even a cowboy practice....that is absolute rubbish and it is that I took issue with.There are instances where a separate DB would be a better installation method than running multiple final circuits a long distance to a main DB,some of those instances have already been acknowledged,others come to mind.
In the part of your quote highlighted you have suddenly inserted "standard sized"....where was this when your original posts were stating that a second CU is never acceptable?.....you were as unaware as I was of all the facts,that is why my first post asked for more info before answers could be given....
The 16mm in question is a 30m run straight through joists 400m apart .SWA would have been a bit of a chew.
I can't see the problem,if its labeled up,how the distribution layout should be a concern.
Anyway if I change the CU for a dual RCD board and come from a way that's 80a 30ms protected and feed my new board that has 5 circuits,how do I allow for division of circuits at my new board?
For those who are thinking lack of competence,would I be ***** to sit here on a saturday night fishing for the answer with a missus pestering for some romance............?
Reply to RCD splitting question in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.