- Reaction score
- 25,509
How are they rigidly joined, they aren't it contact with each other.
Discuss Solutions for Surface mount to conduit. in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net
Like a said being picky but there is no containment for the conductors between the existing back box and the new box aside from butting them together.
How are they rigidly joined, they aren't it contact with each other.
Give me an instance where a door may not be an escape route. If you have passed through it there may be a requirement for you to pass back through it an emergency situation, even the door to a toilet cubicle. You are sitting on the loo and the fire alarm goes off that cubicle door is your escape route, far fetched but true.
None just wanted other people's views on it, I have often thought there is that no man's land between the two enclosures.What potential issues can you see arising from this ?
I was genuinely curious because I have been asked this in the past and thought it was an opportunity to get other views. If a plasterer has added to the depth of plaster then you should fit back box spacers.My view is you're probably bored and trying to create conversation where there is none to be had. You're going on about containment but why would this enclosure not meet the relevant IP ratings?? It looks pretty good to me. If you first fix a property and come back to find the plasterer has added an extra 10mm depth of plaster, I presume you remove all your KO boxes and pack them out by 10mm?
Take a look at 526.5 iii:None just wanted other people's views on it, I have often thought there is that no man's land between the two enclosures.
Reply to Solutions for Surface mount to conduit. in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.