USA politics, recent events.

[GBDamo]

LOL, Never seen such an idiotic post

You must have missed mine then?

 

[MDJ]

I love the banter in general here, it is good we have differing views otherwise it would be so dull, even though I think Trump is a muppet, he was good value for a laugh, every day of his 4 years in office something happened, dozens of people getting the sack for starters, some of his comments were hilarious, however even I cannot argue his love for his country, he was America first, that said the country is more divided now then in the 70s when things were bad there then, I have a feeling he will be back, to me he is a complete joke but to millions of others a hero, a figure that will be remembered in history even in 200 years time for sure.

 

[nicebutdim]

Far enough. However, the rest of his speech just keeps on repeating the same rhetoric about election fraud and the steal etc, and as previously mentioned the tweets beforehand. Enough to inspire the crowd to do what happened IMO.

I do take the point about using terms like 'fight like hell' and its use in general, but whether that was his mens rea or not, that's exactly what happened. Being a man who holds such power or did have, he should of choose his words more carefully.

When I listen to this man, I find his words both arrogant, belittling and offensive. I recall someone posting about how many conflicts previous Presidents had took their country into conflicts, whereas Trump had none. But I wonder how many achievements he's had as a President in comparison?

The speech was heavy on rhetoric and bluster, but nothing that would ordinarily be considered unusual for a politician. I'm not going to claim that some people weren't driven on by his words, but that his words certainly don't come close to incitement of violence.

The contrast with words from many of his political opponents, over the past year, is stark:

Chris Cuomo (CNN Journalist and brother of Democrat Governor of New York) speaking about antifa protesting in NY: "Show me where it says that protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful?"

Nancy Pelosi speaking at 2020 Democrat National Congress: "You've got to be ready to throw a punch."

Maxine Waters (democrat representative) addressing a crowd of supporters: "If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere."

Senator Cory Brooker (democrat) addressing activists: "Get up in the face of some congress people."

Eric Holder (unsuccessful democrat candidate 2020) addressing supporters: "When they go low, we kick them. That's what this new democratic party is about."

Madonna Speaking publicly: "I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the white house."

Robert DeNero speaking about Trump on video to followers: "I'd like to punch him in the face."

Jonny Depp at public rally: "When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?"

Kamala Harris during news interview about nationwide protests: "They're not going to stop.... and nor should they."

Nancy Pelosi (speaker of the house): "I don't know why there aren't uprisings all over the country."

Senator Tim Kaine (democrat): "What we've got to do is fight in Congress, fight in the courts, fight in the streets, fight online, fight at the ballot box, and now there's the momentum to be able to do this."


The above quotes could all be considered as direct incitement to (or justification for) violence, but no one seems to be upset by them.


You mention Trump's achievements and that's something that many people refuse to acknowledge. I don't think anyone would deny many of his daft moments, but not starting a single war was unprecedented in recent times. His reigning in of North Korea would have been considered masterful if managed by anyone else. Restoration of diplomatic ties, cordial relations and direct flights between Israel and several middle eastern countries would have been rewarded with a nobel peace prize, again if it had been managed by anyone else - that process is still dividends.

Anyone who thinks that Trump was an unmitigated disaster would do well to pay attention to US foreign policy during the next four years. They'd also do well to watch employment figures in the US, but that will be heavily skewed by the pandemic.

What I'm trying to get at is that Trump wasn't an ideal president, but nor was he evil incarnate. The man bums and blows a bit, but he got stuff done for America and many other countries.

 

[GBDamo]

The speech was heavy on rhetoric and bluster, but nothing that would ordinarily be considered unusual for a politician. I'm not going to claim that some people weren't driven on by his words, but that his words certainly don't come close to incitement of violence.

The contrast with words from many of his political opponents, over the past year, is stark:

Chris Cuomo (CNN Journalist and brother of Democrat Governor of New York) speaking about antifa protesting in NY: "Show me where it says that protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful?"

Nancy Pelosi speaking at 2020 Democrat National Congress: "You've got to be ready to throw a punch."

Maxine Waters (democrat representative) addressing a crowd of supporters: "If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere."

Senator Cory Brooker (democrat) addressing activists: "Get up in the face of some congress people."

Eric Holder (unsuccessful democrat candidate 2020) addressing supporters: "When they go low, we kick them. That's what this new democratic party is about."

Madonna Speaking publicly: "I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the white house."

Robert DeNero speaking about Trump on video to followers: "I'd like to punch him in the face."

Jonny Depp at public rally: "When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?"

Kamala Harris during news interview about nationwide protests: "They're not going to stop.... and nor should they."

Nancy Pelosi (speaker of the house): "I don't know why there aren't uprisings all over the country."

Senator Tim Kaine (democrat): "What we've got to do is fight in Congress, fight in the courts, fight in the streets, fight online, fight at the ballot box, and now there's the momentum to be able to do this."


The above quotes could all be considered as direct incitement to (or justification for) violence, but no one seems to be upset by them.


You mention Trump's achievements and that's something that many people refuse to acknowledge. I don't think anyone would deny many of his daft moments, but not starting a single war was unprecedented in recent times. His reigning in of North Korea would have been considered masterful if managed by anyone else. Restoration of diplomatic ties, cordial relations and direct flights between Israel and several middle eastern countries would have been rewarded with a nobel peace prize, again if it had been managed by anyone else - that process is still dividends.

Anyone who thinks that Trump was an unmitigated disaster would do well to pay attention to US foreign policy during the next four years. They'd also do well to watch employment figures in the US, but that will be heavily skewed by the pandemic.

What I'm trying to get at is that Trump wasn't an ideal president, but nor was he evil incarnate. The man bums and blows a bit, but he got stuff done for America and many other countries.

Don't you be bringing reason to a bitch fight, there are entrenched positions to defend here.

 

[Midwest]

Qui bono?

As always who benefits?

That most people do not know that many Republican senators were going to use, rightfully, the counting ceremony as an opportunity to air their objections and get them on record is very telling.

The fact that this "insurrection" allowed the process to be halted and subsequently waived through without contest tell us all we need to know.

My Latin stopped after we tried bombing the Latin teacher with books above the open door on April fools day, so you'll have to guide me here.

 

[Midwest]

The speech was heavy on rhetoric and bluster, but nothing that would ordinarily be considered unusual for a politician. I'm not going to claim that some people weren't driven on by his words, but that his words certainly don't come close to incitement of violence.

The contrast with words from many of his political opponents, over the past year, is stark:

Chris Cuomo (CNN Journalist and brother of Democrat Governor of New York) speaking about antifa protesting in NY: "Show me where it says that protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful?"

Nancy Pelosi speaking at 2020 Democrat National Congress: "You've got to be ready to throw a punch."

Maxine Waters (democrat representative) addressing a crowd of supporters: "If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere."

Senator Cory Brooker (democrat) addressing activists: "Get up in the face of some congress people."

Eric Holder (unsuccessful democrat candidate 2020) addressing supporters: "When they go low, we kick them. That's what this new democratic party is about."

Madonna Speaking publicly: "I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the white house."

Robert DeNero speaking about Trump on video to followers: "I'd like to punch him in the face."

Jonny Depp at public rally: "When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?"

Kamala Harris during news interview about nationwide protests: "They're not going to stop.... and nor should they."

Nancy Pelosi (speaker of the house): "I don't know why there aren't uprisings all over the country."

Senator Tim Kaine (democrat): "What we've got to do is fight in Congress, fight in the courts, fight in the streets, fight online, fight at the ballot box, and now there's the momentum to be able to do this."


The above quotes could all be considered as direct incitement to (or justification for) violence, but no one seems to be upset by them.


You mention Trump's achievements and that's something that many people refuse to acknowledge. I don't think anyone would deny many of his daft moments, but not starting a single war was unprecedented in recent times. His reigning in of North Korea would have been considered masterful if managed by anyone else. Restoration of diplomatic ties, cordial relations and direct flights between Israel and several middle eastern countries would have been rewarded with a nobel peace prize, again if it had been managed by anyone else - that process is still dividends.

Anyone who thinks that Trump was an unmitigated disaster would do well to pay attention to US foreign policy during the next four years. They'd also do well to watch employment figures in the US, but that will be heavily skewed by the pandemic.

What I'm trying to get at is that Trump wasn't an ideal president, but nor was he evil incarnate. The man bums and blows a bit, but he got stuff done for America and many other countries.

I'd have to google his achievements, think most of them were stated by someone else, including the Wall. Not sure what he achieved with North Korea, apart from a tourist trip.

 

[GBDamo]

My Latin stopped after we tried bombing the Latin teacher with books above the open door on April fools day, so you'll have to guide me here.

I did its in the second line, who benefits.

You see to believe events were as we are being told you have to believe that,

1, The fanaticalTrump supporters were more interested in torching the Capitol than listening to their Fuhrer speak.

2, They were so stupid that they didn't realise their actions would prevent their case being heard in a full official setting and allow the Dems to push through the electoral college count unopposed.

Or...

Trump deliberately delayed and dragged out his speech keeping the vast majority of his supporters a 45 minute walk away from the Capitol.

The Orchestrated 'insurrection' had to go ahead as there were too many unstoppable wheels in motion and the protest speeches were going on at the count.

The Agent Provocateurs were allowed entry followed by a rag tag buch of professional protesters in MAGA hats and possibly a few stray Trump supporters.

The count was suspended and completed behind close doors.

All the Republican planned challenges were not heard, the evidence of fraud is still not on record.

The media can continue to proclaim there are no credible allegations of fraud.


All the consequences of the "Insurrection" benefitted the Democrats and, despite the allegations laid out in the latest sham impeachment' Trump actually did everything in his power to keep his supporters away from the Capitol.

 

[Darkwood]

While every man and his dog in the media throw dirt at Trump, mainly for his loose lips here is a declassified investigation into the Biden's in particularly Hunter (Presidents son) while Joe Biden was Vice President for Obama.

It exposes corruption and fraud where Joe Biden was well aware and also part of the sequence of events.

The USA has now got a president that is closely linked to corruption and money laundering with foreign states while he was Vice president exposing very strong links to the CCP and in other documents we find his family in receipt of large financial sums through corrupt deals, it is no coincidence that some of the first Executive Orders Biden signed bring foreign nations in particular China back into the USA energy market reversing the independence Trump had created and why Biden shut down a pipeline link to Canada crushing 50,000 job, but of course you know that already, you saw that in the news didn't you ?????
Trump should not have ever been president as it wasn't the way it had been set up but so high was public anger at the establishment that even in the face of underhand tactics by the dem's and foreign states it still wasn't enough to stop Trump... a mistake they ensured would not happen again.

If you understand the names and the Burisma scandal you will be blown away at the level of corruption Obama and Biden were involved in, this is just a sample, it is lengthy and mentions names that you may be unfamiliar with which is key to understanding it all but for a concise conclusion go to P86

https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC%20-%20Finance%20Joint%20Report%202020.09.23.pdf

 

[nicebutdim]

And there are a couple of other serious scandals surrounding Hunter.

 

[Midwest]

While every man and his dog in the media throw dirt at Trump, mainly for his loose lips here is a declassified investigation into the Biden's in particularly Hunter (Presidents son) while Joe Biden was Vice President for Obama.

It exposes corruption and fraud where Joe Biden was well aware and also part of the sequence of events.

The USA has now got a president that is closely linked to corruption and money laundering with foreign states while he was Vice president exposing very strong links to the CCP and in other documents we find his family in receipt of large financial sums through corrupt deals, it is no coincidence that some of the first Executive Orders Biden signed bring foreign nations in particular China back into the USA energy market reversing the independence Trump had created and why Biden shut down a pipeline link to Canada crushing 50,000 job, but of course you know that already, you saw that in the news didn't you ?????
Trump should not have ever been president as it wasn't the way it had been set up but so high was public anger at the establishment that even in the face of underhand tactics by the dem's and foreign states it still wasn't enough to stop Trump... a mistake they ensured would not happen again.

If you understand the names and the Burisma scandal you will be blown away at the level of corruption Obama and Biden were involved in, this is just a sample, it is lengthy and mentions names that you may be unfamiliar with which is key to understanding it all but for a concise conclusion go to P86

https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC%20-%20Finance%20Joint%20Report%202020.09.23.pdf

I don’t see why you are obsessed with the idea that all news/media etc are always wrong and providing false information. You as an individual can’t be providing the sole source of information, for the forum to believe it’s true and factual. You see this report and decide, everything in it is substantial and true.

If a loved is missing or something you care about, and someone tells you they’ve seen them, you want to believe them.

I read & watch the news etc and make my own decision, knowing sometimes the truth can never get in the way of a good story.

I recall this report coming out before the campaign started. I recall it’s been based on a report by two Trump supporters, with countless claims, but would appear to have little actual evidence to support these claims.

If there is any truth in these claims, then further investigation should happen. This report, it is a report not a proper investigation, should be viewed carefully.

Seems not all Republicans agreed on its time of release;

Senator Ron Johnson pulls vote on subpoena in Biden/Ukraine investigation

The Senate Homeland Security Committee did authorize subpoenas related to the probe into the FBI's Russia investigation.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[Darkwood]

@Midwest

Again you make a leap from me pointing out obvious bias to assuming I think the media is always wrong, at no point have I said that or made that claim, in regards to this topic I have on several occasions expressed that the media chooses the information it puts out and what it ignores, this means a public information source can easily manipulate the consumer to see a person or subject matter from one one angle only, this does not mean the information they provide is wrong simply their coverage lacks balance and thus is bias, now given that the BBC's own internal investigations have shown this on numerous occasions and especially on Brexit it is not merely an accusation but point of fact.

The link you supply is merely evidence of the relentless attempt to bury the story as it could destroy Biden, it is not about whether it is true anymore, we know it is, Joe Biden is on video gloating about it himself, we also must remember that in the USA like the UK particular parties have members that do not agree with their own party direction, in a sense they will vote with the opposition in critical matters, this is common and has no reflection on if something has more substance because a member of his own party went awol, over here we have the party whip to try maintain common direction but in the US they don't.

The link you gave proves clearly my point I have made and the last paragraph is telling, it does not deny the allegations or any of the findings it is complaining it could undermine the recent election and the outcome but ain't that what it should be about, if someone is guilty while in office you cannot really blame the opposition for using it when it favours them the most can you.

 

[Darkwood]

Here is the moment Biden openly admits to abusing his political position of vice president to protect his son in an investigation of corruption.
Watch Biden Brag About Bribing Ukraine To Fire Investigator Of Son's Biz - https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/24/watch-joe-biden-brag-about-bribing-ukraine-to-fire-the-prosecutor-investigating-his-sons-company/

Here is a report that the company has admitted in court it bribed Biden, and that any disputes are simply about the size of the bribe not that it too place or not, I have the actual list of payments and it is more than the stated 50,000 but that info has only been leaked recently so the 50,000 was estimated at the time hence the dispute.

Burisma admits in court that it bribed Joe and Hunter Biden

A developing story about the case of Ukrainian gas holding company Burisma against People’s Deputy of Ukraine Andriy Derkach has revealed that Burisma did, in fact, bribe Joe and Hunter Biden with large cash payments. The only question is how much did these two crooks receive? In its dismissal...

corruption.news

Now I have the transcripts of some of the legal proceedings but these reports by the media simplify the task of translating what is hours of reading, it is clearly published as a statement of fact not an allegation and this must be noted as the publisher would be in a lot of legal trouble if it had made this up.

 

[Midwest]

Your exposé came a few months ago, and the few reports I could be bothered to read, says there is little evidence to support the claims.

If there is, I’m sure it will come out in the wash, you can say I told you so.

 

[nicebutdim]

I don’t see why you are obsessed with the idea that all news/media etc are always wrong and providing false information. You as an individual can’t be providing the sole source of information, for the forum to believe it’s true and factual. You see this report and decide, everything in it is substantial and true.

If a loved is missing or something you care about, and someone tells you they’ve seen them, you want to believe them.

I read & watch the news etc and make my own decision, knowing sometimes the truth can never get in the way of a good story.

On the subject of media bias, I'd point to the video of Trump's speech and how many news outlets had cut short the clip where he called for supporters to "peacefully and patriotically" make their voices heard and instead focused on discussing his edited words.

You had rightly pointed out that transcripts could be edited and seemed to be unaware of the actual words spoken, yet I was able to provide video evidence to confirm those words. What better example could be given of selective reporting, than this very thread demonstrating how your own perception of events had been skewed?


That story about Biden and Ukraine? Would you believe me if I told you that Biden sat on a stage at the Council for Foreign Relations and recounted how he pressured Ukraine's government into firing the prosecutor that was investigating his son? It's out there on the most public of platforms - Youtube.

 

[Midwest]

Yep I’ve seen the vid.

I‘m not sure that shows what you are suggesting. He wanted the authorities to take ‘action’ against their State Prosecutor. So the inference is, he wanted to remove the Prosecutor who was investigating wrong doing by his son, then braggs about it on tv?

Here’s another view;

Does a video show Joe Biden confessing to bribery? No

A reader asked, "How come Joe Biden is on film bragging about getting the Prosecutor investigating Burisma fired and fac

www.politifact.com

 

[nicebutdim]

The inference is that it was all rather convenient that two birds were killed with one stone. Also of interest is the manner in which he tells the story - not a factual summary of events, but bragging about how he dealt with little people. If that had been Trump, the video would have been headline news around the world and we'd have read headlines decrying his arrogance and alleging corruption.


I used that example to tie in with Darkwood's point about media bias, but the crux of my post was highlighting the fact that selective reporting by news outlets had left you unaware of the context of Trump's comments on January 6th. Don't you feel let down at having been misled by, what should be, reliable sources of information?

 

[MDJ]

. Don't you feel let down at having been misled by, what should be, reliable sources of information?

Yes but we have been let down over here for years, the BBC for starters only tell half the story as they see it, that's why I and most others look online for lots of sides of the story to build our own conclusion, and Sky is heavily Tory , so news is the same here as the USA, one thing trump is right about and that is fake news, problem is he spouts a lot of it himself as well.

 

[Midwest]

The inference is that it was all rather convenient that two birds were killed with one stone. Also of interest is the manner in which he tells the story - not a factual summary of events, but bragging about how he dealt with little people. If that had been Trump, the video would have been headline news around the world and we'd have read headlines decrying his arrogance and alleging corruption.


I used that example to tie in with Darkwood's point about media bias, but the crux of my post was highlighting the fact that selective reporting by news outlets had left you unaware of the context of Trump's comments on January 6th. Don't you feel let down at having been misled by, what should be, reliable sources of information?

I confess I’d not really listen to his speech, but I’d heard of his tweets etc before and he’d been suspended from some accounts, because he had gone too far. He told his supporters to gather on the 6th Jan, then spoke on and on about fraud election & the steal etc. Which IMO resulted in stirring hysteria and the resultant violent mob.

But you have to confess, that the Biden You Tube thing wasn’t really what you thought it was, was it.

As I said before, if your looking for evidence to support your claim, you sometimes aren’t subjective enough. You see what you want to see.

You guys might have valid points, but you will have to leave it to the experts to investigate. Remember Nixon and the like; they don’t always get away with things.

 

[GBDamo]

I confess I’d not really listen to his speech, but I’d heard of his tweets etc before and he’d been suspended from some accounts, because he had gone too far. He told his supporters to gather on the 6th Jan, then spoke on and on about fraud election & the steal etc. Which IMO resulted in stirring hysteria and the resultant violent mob.

But you have to confess, that the Biden You Tube thing wasn’t really what you thought it was, was it.

As I said before, if your looking for evidence to support your claim, you sometimes aren’t subjective enough. You see what you want to see.

You guys might have valid points, but you will have to leave it to the experts to investigate. Remember Nixon and the like; they don’t always get away with things.

The days of pioneering investigative journalists is gone Westy.

Today we have simpletons with humanities degrees who either quote Twitter as an authoritative source or just regurgitate Associated Press press releases.

Thats without even delving into partiality.

 

[electric al]

Nixon looked like an honest broker compared to Kennedy and you could say he got away with it

 

[Midwest]

The days of pioneering investigative journalists is gone Westy.

Today we have simpletons with humanities degrees who either quote Twitter as an authoritative source or just regurgitate Associated Press press releases.

Thats without even delving into partiality.

Well, perhaps they should get their teeth into Trump. -

 

[electric al]

Do I like Donald Trump on a personal level ? No
Do I think the US needed a president such as a him ? Yes
The thing with trump is he refused to play the politician and diplomat. He was predictably unpredictable and
that kept people on their toes.
Of course he said some stupid stuff but he also cut through the crap at times and got things done. He put a lot of career politicians noses out of joint and his ante establishment brash style of governance made him a hate figure for many.
I do however think that for many he was never going to be given a fair chance and any achievements were going to be scorned , quite simply he polarised opinion. Maybe history will view him in a kinder light.

 

[nicebutdim]

Yes but we have been let down over here for years, the BBC for starters only tell half the story as they see it, that's why I and most others look online for lots of sides of the story to build our own conclusion, and Sky is heavily Tory , so news is the same here as the USA, one thing trump is right about and that is fake news, problem is he spouts a lot of it himself as well.

I don't have Sky, but wouldn't consider Sky news to have a Conservative bias. Kay Burly and Adam Boulton are about as anti-tory as it is possible to be.

 

[nicebutdim]

I confess I’d not really listen to his speech, but I’d heard of his tweets etc before and he’d been suspended from some accounts, because he had gone too far. He told his supporters to gather on the 6th Jan, then spoke on and on about fraud election & the steal etc. Which IMO resulted in stirring hysteria and the resultant violent mob.

But you have to confess, that the Biden You Tube thing wasn’t really what you thought it was, was it.

As I said before, if your looking for evidence to support your claim, you sometimes aren’t subjective enough. You see what you want to see.

You guys might have valid points, but you will have to leave it to the experts to investigate. Remember Nixon and the like; they don’t always get away with things.

I'm posting for myself and not as a representative of any 'guys'. I'm not looking for evidence to support any claims, but pointing out that much news is selectively reported.

The Biden video shows what I suggested it did: that Joe Biden sat on a stage and recounted how he'd pressured Ukraine into firing the prosecutor that was investigating his son. This is 100% factually correct, regardless of whether you believe it was coincidental or by design.

I'm not sure how to reconcile you statement that "resulted in stirring hysteria and the resultant violent mob.", when in the same paragraph you admit to 'not really' having listened to his speech. Those conflicting statements could be construed as meaning you accepted news reports (that you now know to have carefully selected what they were reporting) at face value.


On a different note; Trump's twitter ban didn't actually result from him having gone too far, but was actually implemented after a surprisingly innocuous tweet. I'm not claiming that Trump didn't tweet a lot of contentious comments, but making the point that those weren't actually the reason for his ban.

 

[nicebutdim]

Maybe history will view him in a kinder light.

They say that history is written by the victors. On that basis I'm not sure how history will record his presidency, given that many people flatly refuse to acknowledge anything that might be considered remotely positive.

I'm not sure when debate spirraled to such a partisan low point, but a considerable number of people refuse to accept issues in any terms other than black and white. For people of that mindset nuance does not exist.

 

[MDJ]

I don't have Sky, but wouldn't consider Sky news to have a Conservative bias. Kay Burly and Adam Boulton are about as anti-tory as it is possible to be.

?

 

[electric al]

It may not be long into the Biden administration before some realise trump wasnt that bad after all

 

[Darkwood]

Sky is a funny cookie tbh, European Sky news is very EU centric and is anti-brexit and often sides with left wing policies and views, if you were to duck down under and watch Aussie Sky news then you would see reporting that reflects the long running coalition which hovers around centre right since 2013.

It's quite a contradictory affair if you watch EU Sky and Aussie Sky, you can often see the opposite in reporting direction on the same matter, if we take Trump for example, EU Sky always seem to have a negative skew on any Trump story whereas in contrast Aussie Sky has a positive skew even on the same matters.
This simple example with the same company goes a long way to show why you should never accept these news channels are balanced and unbiased, they are simply serving the biggest financiers from that area.

 

[MDJ]

Sky is a funny cookie tbh, European Sky news is very EU centric and is anti-brexit and often sides with left wing policies and views, if you were to duck down under and watch Aussie Sky news then you would see reporting that reflects the long running coalition which hovers around centre right since 2013.

It's quite a contradictory affair if you watch EU Sky and Aussie Sky, you can often see the opposite in reporting direction on the same matter, if we take Trump for example, EU Sky always seem to have a negative skew on any Trump story whereas in contrast Aussie Sky has a positive skew even on the same matters.
This simple example with the same company goes a long way to show why you should never accept these news channels are balanced and unbiased, they are simply serving the biggest financiers from that area.

Sky UK is definitely a Rupert Murdoch pro Tory Channel and the earlier comment from nicebutdim was so hilarious I have still not stopped laughing, to suggest Adam Bolton was not a Tory is the most hilarious post I have ever seen, a brilliant bit of Comedy from the guy pmsl hahaha. as for Kay Burley she should be sacked for going to South Africa and then having to isolate when getting home for breaking the rules, the 6 month suspension is a farce, we have the BBC who are Left wing and Sky right wing, hence my comment about Fake news over here, one thing Trump has got right about the media

 

[MDJ]

It may not be long into the Biden administration before some realise trump wasnt that bad after all

I doubt it, the Yanks may think it Pal but everyone else in the world will know otherwise, Biden is already back into the Climate situation with us all and is trying to get Iran back on board, he is also actually giving a rubbish about corona virus and not playing golf instead, he needs time, but surely cannot be worse than the big orange buffoon.

 

[MDJ]

Do I think the US needed a president such as a him ? Yes

No he is not the right guy, the USA is IMO probably one if not the most racist nation on earth, they still run buses in the south with signs saying "Coloreds only" at the back of buses and the cops shoot them in the back FFS for resisting arrest even if not armed, Trump is adored by the Whites in the USA, given the mutli national peoples there he is not the guy to unite America, I don't think that person has been born yet, far too soon for the Yanks to accept other creeds, they are 150 years behind the modern world when it comes to equality.

 

[electric al]

I can remember when the BBC was renowned for its impartiality regarding news .
The news readers job was to read the news without showing any emotion ,no raised eyebrows ,no inflections, no intimations or smiles just deliver the story with no spin or directing. Allow people to draw their own conclusions as opposed being given their opinions.

 

[MDJ]

I can remember when the BBC was renowned for its impartiality regarding news .
The news readers job was to read the news without showing any emotion ,no raised eyebrows ,no inflections, no intimations or smiles just deliver the story with no spin or directing. Allow people to draw their own conclusions as opposed being given their opinions.

Yes me too, I am a not a right wing thinking guy at all, however even I am appalled at how left wing the BBC has gone, it needs shutting Down or Defunding at least IMO

 

[GBDamo]

If you think the election was fun wait till the dust settles on GameStop.

Worth a Google.

 

[electric al]

No he is not the right guy, the USA is IMO probably one if not the most racist nation on earth, they still run buses in the south with signs saying "Coloreds only" at the back of buses and the cops shoot them in the back FFS for resisting arrest even if not armed, Trump is adored by the Whites in the USA, given the mutli national peoples there he is not the guy to unite America, I don't think that person has been born yet, far too soon for the Yanks to accept other creeds, they are 150 years behind the modern world when it comes to equality.

Over 70 million people thought so .Not all white by a long chalk! If they are so behind that's not the fault of Trump .Obama had 2 terms to do something about it .
Ohhh and anyone runs the risk of being shot in the back for resisting arrest in the U S.

 

[MDJ]

Over 70 million people thought so .Not all white by a long chalk! If they are so behind that's not the fault of Trump .Obama had 2 terms to do something about it .
Ohhh and anyone runs the risk of being shot in the back for resisting arrest in the U S.

and 80 million voted for Biden and they were not all white, however it is fact there are a lot of Whites in the USA who love him and voted for him, cannot remember the last time a white man or woman was shot 6 or 7 times in the back whilst running away from a copper unarmed, I expect it has maybe happened but with the Black folk over there we know it happens and happens far to often, if you have been to the states you would know, and if you tell me you have and you have not noticed Blacks are racially abused over there then I won't believe you, maybe in the north near New York etc everyone is treated equally but in the south areas they are literally 150 years behind the rest of the world still in their thinking and they love trump down there, not everywhere obviously but most of the south areas.

 

[Darkwood]

Gamestop incident was Karma on the highest level, unfortunately so many companies are tied into that shortfall investment schemes that it effect the pensions of millions of people, the unfortunate victims here, this wasn't just about a few individuals or companies running for a steal.
This will have serious ramifications for yrs to come and may alter how company shareholding works,

 

[electric al]

I've been to the US several times though not to the deep south admittedly. Do you think things will dramatically get better under Biden and his vice president Harris ? There are many such incidences that dont attract the same amount of coverage of white ppl being shot for resisting arrest

 

[MDJ]

I've been to the US several times though not to the deep south admittedly. Do you think things will dramatically get better under Biden and his vice president Harris ? There are many such incidences that dont attract the same amount of coverage of white ppl being shot for resisting arrest

No things will not get better as I said, IMO the right president to unite the country has not been born yet, they are still 150 years behind the rest of the modern world regarding equality, but Biden will rebuild relationships with the world in which trump destroyed, at least the US will gain some credibility back, except with Israel of course who loved Trump due to his anti Iranian views.

 

[GBDamo]

and 80 million voted for Biden.....

Of course they, did more than any president in history.....

Are there really people that believe that 80 million people voted for Biden?

Nowt as Queer as folk as me gran used to say, she's been dead thirty years so probably voted for him herself.

 

[electric al]

To be honest Trump uplifted the credibility rating of the US as far as I'm concerned .It probably reached an all time low under Obahma .Sure he looked the part and sounded presidential enough but it was all built on sand

 

[andyb]

To be honest Trump uplifted the credibility rating of the US as far as I'm concerned .It probably reached an all time low under Obahma .Sure he looked the part and sounded presidential enough but it was all built on sand

Really? Did you post this just to get a reaction Al?

 

[andyb]

Can someone on here give me some evidence of BBC left wing bias please? I'm interested because I'd say it was the other way round, in so much as the BBC seem, to me, to be a Tory goverment mouth piece.

Thanks in advance.

 

[andyb]

Gamestop incident was Karma on the highest level, unfortunately so many companies are tied into that shortfall investment schemes that it effect the pensions of millions of people, the unfortunate victims here, this wasn't just about a few individuals or companies running for a steal.
This will have serious ramifications for yrs to come and may alter how company shareholding works,

How does this affect pensions DW? Surley this is about shorting, if any pension funds held shares in Gamestop, which I doubt, then they were due to lose anyway if the shorters (is that a word?) were correct in their gamble in the first place. Don't forget the shorters borrowed shares hoping the value would drop, so not good for pension funds.

 

[snowhead]

Of course they, did more than any president in history.....

Are there really people that believe that 80 million people voted for Biden?

Nowt as Queer as folk as me gran used to say, she's been dead thirty years so probably voted for him herself.

And exactly the same could be said of Trump.
Your Gran probably voted for both of them.
There was no evidence of any substance presented to say that Biden votes were fraudulent.
However no-one looked to see if any of the votes for Trump were fraudulent.
There could have been millions of fake votes for Trump, there certainly was something going on in Florida, where Trump won.

Have a search for Shadow candidates.

 

[GBDamo]

How does this affect pensions DW? Surley this is about shorting, if any pension funds held shares in Gamestop, which I doubt, then they were due to lose anyway if the shorters (is that a word?) were correct in their gamble in the first place. Don't forget the shorters borrowed shares hoping the value would drop, so not good for pension funds.

I'm not sure pensions can invest in these funds..

..however when the short seller makes a position he borrows a share at its current value, say $10, and has a set period of time to give that share back.

So, when he receives the shares, say 1,000,000 he sells them to realise the money but it is shares he owes not money. When his position closes he has to return the shares.

Hopefully, over the agreed period, the share price has fallen and our trader simply buys the number of shares he owes and hands them back, pocketing the difference.

Now, in the case of GameStop the price has been driven up hugely, $450, and in order to cover his position our trader needs to find 450,000,000 to but the shares he owes.

In order to do this our trader now has to go to his boss, explain how fu**ed they are and liquidate other assets to raise the funds.

These other assets will have downward pressures on other stock prices that safer institutions, pension pots, will hold.

So, yes it will have an effect on pensions...

...but since the boomers pulled the ladder up after them and most of these nerds don't have pensions then they really don't care.

Karma.

 

[GBDamo]

And exactly the same could be said of Trump.
Your Gran probably voted for both of them.
There was no evidence of any substance presented to say that Biden votes were fraudulent.
However no-one looked to see if any of the votes for Trump were fraudulent.
There could have been millions of fake votes for Trump, there certainly was something going on in Florida, where Trump won.

Have a search for Shadow candidates.

Probably, there has been fraud since God was a lad.

Just a little more industrial, and less credible, now.

 

[brianmoooore]

There could have been millions of fake votes for Trump, there certainly was something going on in Florida, where Trump won.

I'd put big money on it! Slowing the postal service, removal of drop off boxes, intimidation at the polling stations, thugs baying at the windows of the vote counting stations - these are just some of the things they didn't even try to hide.

 

[andyb]

I'm not sure pensions can invest in these funds..

..however when the short seller makes a position he borrows a share at its current value, say $10, and has a set period of time to give that share back.

So, when he receives the shares, say 1,000,000 he sells them to realise the money but it is shares he owes not money. When his position closes he has to return the shares.

Hopefully, over the agreed period, the share price has fallen and our trader simply buys the number of shares he owes and hands them back, pocketing the difference.

Now, in the case of GameStop the price has been driven up hugely, $450, and in order to cover his position our trader needs to find 450,000,000 to but the shares he owes.

In order to do this our trader now has to go to his boss, explain how fu**ed they are and liquidate other assets to raise the funds.

These other assets will have downward pressures on other stock prices that safer institutions, pension pots, will hold.

So, yes it will have an effect on pensions...

...but since the boomers pulled the ladder up after them and most of these nerds don't have pensions then they really don't care.

Karma.

Thanks GB but I know how shorting works, I just don't believe anyone shorting a company like Gamestop will have any discernible on pension funds. I don't think your explanation does it for me.

 

[nicebutdim]

Sky UK is definitely a Rupert Murdoch pro Tory Channel and the earlier comment from nicebutdim was so hilarious I have still not stopped laughing, to suggest Adam Bolton was not a Tory is the most hilarious post I have ever seen, a brilliant bit of Comedy from the guy pmsl hahaha. as for Kay Burley she should be sacked for going to South Africa and then having to isolate when getting home for breaking the rules, the 6 month suspension is a farce, we have the BBC who are Left wing and Sky right wing, hence my comment about Fake news over here, one thing Trump has got right about the media

I've no idea of his political sympathies, and don't have access to Sky News, but his social media accounts are heavily critical of Brexit and Boris Johnson's government.

Can only comment on his opinions expressed via public platforms.