Remember the checks
before a CU change are really about establishing what extra work is likely to be involved in making the installation safe & reliable overall. After the CU change you have all of the usual tests to be done anyway, but you really want to be able to quote the customer a realistic price
first and explain why so they don't get a nasty surprise later and you get a reputation for not sticking to the expected quote.
So global IR (L+N to E) is a good and simple one:
- If above a couple of Mohm at 500V all is fine
- If not, but OK at 250V probably a SPD in some extension cable - not a big risk.
- If a few tens of kOhm it might be a RCD socket outlet or similar, but it could be more trouble like soaked/trashed cable or wet junction box.
- If few ohms or less then a N - E short that has to be found and fixed
Checking CPC continuity is another important point:
- For any RFC the end-end loop R is a very good start, though does not prove any spurs are correct, but otherwise high confidence
- For any radial a R1+R2 check at furthest point is good test (for radial sockets again not proving any other branches are OK)
- Light circuits - always a worry as pre-1966 wiring might lack CPCs (see BPG#1 for info on that case) or sadly more likely is some muppet did not connect up CPCs thinking lights were double-insulated or similar. Again R1+R2 test or wander lead to a couple of light fittings will find if serious issue or not.
Checking the means of earthing / supply Ze is important so any assumptions on design values for final Zs, etc, are acceptable.
Last but by no means least, the danger of linked circuits:
- The issue of a "borrowed neutral" between light circuits, typically a badly implemented up/down system. Not only dangerous but going to trip any RCBO/RCD.
- A cross-linked pair of RFC (where two RFC are in one giant loop fed from two MCBs) which is a major safety risk as well since 64A equivalent breaker way above 2.5mm cable's safe ratings