reading through all these comments has just shown me both how lucky i am, and the sort of bubble i must be living in. I've not been in the game that long in comparrison to most (<15years), and i haven't done any qualifiacations outside my apprenticeship, approved and 17th. I wouldn't even know where to go to find out what quals i am meant to have before i were to do certain jobs. I live and work in Scotland, and frankly, the talk of Part P bewilders me.
I originally started as a spark in the army, and had to re-do a proper apprenticeship when i came out as my qualifications (basically nothing) didn't cross over. I worked domestic through my time, and now work industrial 'maintenance'.
I am the electrical supervisor at a factory, and for example, for a comparrison, one guy is 25 years old and another is 58years old. The younger of the 2 is always asking to be sent on courses and if i get granted the funding from the directors, i send him. The older guy, i basically had to force him to go sit his 17th edition exam. His attitude was that he served his time nearly 40 years ago and that is enough. Regs etc don't come into it with his attitude. And dare i say it, even with all this guys experience, how can that be proved without documentation? He could of done his trade 40years ago and worked as a baker for 30years before he came here for all i know.
This is where i agree with the point that a lisence, or a register should be properly introduced with annual/biannual or whatever assessments. Then, everyone would know where they stand, what they need to do to achieve this.
Back to the OP, this is where i feel lucky...it's a great point and very thought provoking, but i seem to have side-stepped the comotion (for now) of the building trade by working in the relative safety of industrial maintenance.