Discuss BS88 max ZS table for fuses over 63A TT or not TT in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Are you suggesting that i can install the Rods in addition to the connection to TNCS? Wont that just put me at a greater risk of drawing Neutral currents into my system when a PEN fault occurs?
The open PEN current is the reason for the 10mm minimum copper equivalent for extraneous bonds, as a metal building you have that in any case.

From the Prysmian data sheet for SWA the 4-core 25mm has 70mm steel armour, that is a little under 10mm copper equivalent so for retaining TN-C-S your options are either 5 core SWA (so L1-3, N and E) or cheaper to run some 10mm or probably 16mm in parallel in the duct, etc,

The danger from TN-C-S and metalwork is that it becomes dangerously high relative to the true Earth around it and so a shock hazard under open PEN conditions (I suspect that is a low risk in a isolated area). Adding earth rods helps in two ways:
  • Firstly helping "pull down" the neutral/CPC potential as it provides a path for the neutral current to go (possibly reducing the risk of over-voltage damage to thing as well)
  • Secondly by "pulling up" the potential of the local Earth close to the CPC/metalwork potential
I think somewhere 20 ohms or below for earth rod impedance in mentioned, look for the section for swimming pools or agricultural special areas.

The BBB = big blue book, a non-obvious reference to the 18th edition wiring regs!
 
BBB i shoudl have got that... Doh!

Just putting the design together for this, and am using BS88 bolted fuses. The Current Characteristics scale at this level (compared to a 6A lighting circuit) is pretty scary... It will supply 200A for 1000S before rupturing! Pretty worrying when you think you could use a 70Degree 25mm cable on this. But i suppose as long as Iz is greater than In then all is good. But still... :)
 
For fuses typically your disconnection times are met for about 5*In which is scary if you spend too much time thinking about it. But the time/current curves of fuses/MCCB/MCB are all based on the typical overload survival of cables. You just don't want to do it too often!
 
Okay, it has been a while since i have had to do these calcs, so am a bit rusty - please be gentle if there are glaring errors, i am trying to do the right thing. I also think that i am being over conservative re the size of the cable. It is only buried for 10% of the length (where it enters and exists buildings) and moves from being a 25mm to a 35mm as a result of ref method D...

I still need to measure Ze, and i think i missed to adjust R1+R2 from tabulated to temp compensated.

Also as i am used to using certain cable types, i never really appreciated how much that the higher Temp (90deg) cables offer (v.s. 70Deg) such a significant increase in CSA - stands to reason i guess. Just need to specify the correct BS when I order the cable...

Attached are the details of the electrical part of the project i have put together, and the calcs i have performed based on the info i have obtained. I have Used the BBB :) but i don't do these types of designs every day.

Incidentally i will be installing RCDs on the outputs of the speed controller to the pumps, as the Pumps are outside on metal and wooden frames sat on gravel and concreate. They will be interlocked with the fault monition so if an RCD trips, the controller will also be shut down. Resetting an RCD on full load could result in some pretty fireworks...

I would be grateful for any comments please.

Thank you.

John
 

Attachments

  • TPPump.docx
    499.1 KB · Views: 7
Here goes: If you are looking at a 100A supply fuse as overload protection then yes, it probably needs to be 35mm cable in duct. However, you could get away with 25mm for the full running current of both motors and for a volt-drop point of view. Personally I would go with 35mm as then it is met for open 70C cable and so the end accessories are not at risk of working with 90C or thereabouts cable.

Estimated 10A three phase for ancillary might be high, that is 6.9kW, but not really much to argue over.

Looking at the Hager guide for 45kW motor assisted start it has 80A fuse as protection, 22kW individually as 50A fuse, so your 100A fuse is fine even for simultaneous start of both motors.

100A fuse in Table B3 of the OSG has 0.34 ohms as measured (i.e. cold) Zs for meeting 5s and also adiabatic for 16mm CPC so no issues there.

If the supply is TN-C-S and reasonable, say better than 10% drop on full load, then your supply Ze is going to be around 0.23 ohms (23V = 10% at 100A, probably less, but to be measured or inquired) so max R1+R2 for sub-main limit is 0.34 - 0.23 = 0.11 ohms.

Assuming 35mm 5-core cable then R1+R2 as seen from volt drop tables as 1.25 mOhm/m so length limit is 0.11 / 1.25E-3 = 88m and as longer than your 50m planned length is met.

If you are really paranoid about worst-case cable fault you would look at armour resistance and work out the worst place for a fault, etc. Looking at the Prysmian data sheet for 35mm 5-core the armour is 1.6 mOhm/m so the worst location works out at 34.9m from the supply end and R1 there is 0.022 ohm and R2 is 0.028 ohms (armour from source in parallel with remaining armour to end and the 5th CPC core back to source) so R1+R2 worst-case fault location is 0.05 ohms and less than the above limit of 0.11 ohm based on a guestimated Ze and fuse for 5s sub-main.

Alternatively you could say max Ze = 0.34 (max fuse) - 0.05 (worst case R1+R2) = 0.29 ohm.

At the pump end you are either looking at 63A D-curve MCBs or 50A BS88 fuses for the pumps, based on Hager data sheets (page 102 of commercial one here Hager Brochures, Catalogues & Documentations - https://hager.com/uk/p/catalogues-brochures). From the OSG Table B6 final circuit values for 63A-D we don't have Zs limit nor does the OSG give 50A final circuit fuses (not really domestic or common commercial I guess?). So let us compute the 63A-D MCB from max "instant" trip of 10-20 * In so max = 20 * 63 = 1260A so we can compute Zs limit as:
  • Zs = 230 * 0.95 * 0.8 / 1260 = 0.14 ohm
From our guesstimated Ze 0f 0.23 ohm we can never meet < 0.4s for the 63A D-curve MCB, we would need to rely on and RCD to meet disconnection times if socketed. If hard-wired, as probably the case, we can allow 5s as for the sub-main and that is listed in OSG Table B6 at 0.28 ohms for the MCB so we might be able to meet it if the supply Ze is a little lower.

Further more looking at the Hager tables on fuse-MCB selectivity we have none with a 100A fuse, so this is not a good design as a hard phase-neutral or phase-phase fault could take out the supply fuse(s) with any RCD seeing nothing wrong with such a current path. That is surprising as the 63A C-curve MCB is selective to 4.4kA faults so probably fine at end of cables, but alas not for the D-curve recommended for such a motor!

50A BS88 fuse from table on Fig 3A3 has 0.4s at 380A so Zs limit is:
  • Zs = 230 * 0.95 * 0.8 / 380 = 0.46 ohm
As we already have to meed 0.34 on the sub-main for the supply fuse we could allow a further R1+R2 of 0.12 ohm and meet 0.4s final disconnection. Furthermore a 50A BS88 fuse is totally selective with a similar 100A upstream fuse, so this is a good choice. Just not so convenient as a couple of breakers in a board.

As above, if hard-wired then 5s is permitted and the OSG table B3 has Zs max at 0.79 ohm and adiabatic met for 6mm or more at that time.
 
Last edited:
Thanks forth detail! Appreciate your time!
Here goes: If you are looking at a 100A supply fuse as overload protection then yes, it probably needs to be 35mm cable in duct. However, you could get away with 25mm for the full running current of both motors and for a volt-drop point of view. Personally I would go with 35mm as then it is met for open 70C cable and so the end accessories are not at risk of working with 90C or thereabouts cable. very good point concerning accessories temp.

Estimated 10A three phase for ancillary might be high, that is 6.9kW, but not really much to argue over. - Agree, may need small heater at some stage and right now the Pump control box is providing a simple SP 20A fuse in the control kit, was planning to split this down to lighting (6A RCBO & 16A RCBO Radial - single socket) - utilisation yea next to nothing but it does nothing to impact cable size :).

Looking at the Hager guide for 45kW motor assisted start it has 80A fuse as protection, 22kW individually as 50A fuse, so your 100A fuse is fine even for simultaneous start of both motors.

100A fuse in Table B3 of the OSG has 0.34 ohms as measured (i.e. cold) Zs for meeting 5s and also adiabatic for 16mm CPC so no issues there.

If the supply is TN-C-S and reasonable, say better than 10% drop on full load, then your supply Ze is going to be around 0.23 ohms (23V = 10% at 100A, probably less, but to be measured or inquired) so max R1+R2 for sub-main limit is 0.34 - 0.23 = 0.11 ohms.

Assuming 35mm 5-core cable then R1+R2 as seen from volt drop tables as 1.25 mOhm/m so length limit is 0.11 / 1.25E-3 = 88m and as longer than your 50m planned length is met.

If you are really paranoid about worst-case cable fault you would look at armour resistance and work out the worst place for a fault, etc. Looking at the Prysmian data sheet for 35mm 5-core the armour is 1.6 mOhm/m so the worst location works out at 34.9m from the supply end and R1 there is 0.022 ohm and R2 is 0.028 ohms (armour from source in parallel with remaining armour to end and the 5th CPC core back to source) so R1+R2 worst-case fault location is 0.05 ohms and less than the above limit of 0.11 ohm based on a guestimated Ze and fuse for 5s sub-main. Hmmm. Nice!

Alternatively you could say max Ze = 0.34 (max fuse) - 0.05 (worst case R1+R2) = 0.29 ohm.

At the pump end you are either looking at 63A D-curve MCBs or 50A BS88 fuses for the pumps, based on Hager data sheets (page 102 of commercial one here Hager Brochures, Catalogues & Documentations - https://hager.com/uk/p/catalogues-brochures). From the OSG Table B6 final circuit values for 63A-D we don't have Zs limit nor does the OSG give 50A final circuit fuses (not really domestic or common commercial I guess?). So let us compute the 63A-D MCB from max "instant" trip of 10-20 * In so max = 20 * 63 = 1260A so we can compute Zs limit as:
  • Zs = 230 * 0.95 * 0.8 / 1260 = 0.14 ohm
Adjustable overloads are already provided within the controller by the controller supplier - it is a built up panel, with alarm inputs, outputs and such like i need to check the overloads find graphs, ZS etc for them and check the supplied cable tales on the pumps to make sure all is well. Wil be annoyed if not as pumps and controller came form the same supplier - cracking job on the panel... Plan was to protect the Pump control panel supply cable - (35mm / everything) with a single TP 100A switch fuse back at the meter, then install an isolator local to the pump control panel before it dives in. Internal cabling is 25mm Tri rated up to the Overloads.

From our guesstimated Ze 0f 0.23 ohm we can nevermeet < 0.4s for the 63A D-curve MCB, we would need to rely on and RCD to meet disconnection times if socketed. If hard-wired, as probably the case, we can allow 5s as for the sub-main and that is listed in OSG Table B6 at 0.28 ohms for the MCB so we might be able to meet it if the supply Ze is a little lower.
They are fixed, but outside the EP zone, so will be providing RCDs, mounted inside the cabinet after the speed controllers. I need to get RCDs with a jockey on them, so i can also shut down the speed controller when the RCD trips. Mounted inside the controller, so you have to isolate the supply to reset them - otherwise big risk of someone resting them on full start load (after the speed controllers have ramped up) with pumps in stopped sate - no back EMF and a big bang :)

Further more looking at the Hager tables on fuse-MCB selectivity we have none with a 100A fuse, so this is not a good design as a hard phase-neutral or phase-phase fault could take out the supply fuse(s) with any RCD seeing nothing wrong with such a current path. That is surprising as the 63A C-curve MCB is selective to 4.4kA faults so probably fine at end of cables, but alas not for the D-curve recommended for such a motor!
I cannot see how i can discriminate here. Other than under rating the 88 fuse at 80A (the graphs show they will take it) - even then as you say a hard fault will take the lot out. Honestly i was going to snip one of the supply fuses record exact details of the exact make and keep some on site for that eventuality if it occurs. I have not checked but the Pump guys said that MCBs will be too much trouble and yo wil never get eth ZS at D rating - i still need to look at graphs for them etc though.

50A BS88 fuse from table on Fig 3A3 has 0.4s at 380A so Zs limit is:
  • Zs = 230 * 0.95 * 0.8 / 380 = 0.46 ohm
As we already have to meed 0.34 on the sub-main for the supply fuse we could allow a further R1+R2 of 0.12 ohm and meet 0.4s final disconnection. Furthermore a 50A BS88 fuse is totally selective with a similar 100A upstream fuse, so this is a good choice. Just not so convenient as a couple of breakers in a board.

As above, if hard-wired then 5s is permitted and the OSG table B3 has Zs max at 0.79 ohm and adiabatic met for 6mm or more at that time.
Thank you again, i guess you do this day in day out - nice one :). I did the C course way back when and almost went on to HNC/D but, we hit a recession and i had to work nights, then left the company not long after any way. Never too late i guess :)
 
Keeping "10A" 3-phase allowance for extras is not a bad idea, as you say lights, a socket or two, maybe fixed heater if a lot maintenance in cold winter likely.

Realised I made a mistake in the worst-case armour location as I solved for the highest R2 location, not the highest R1 + R2 location. Actually result for same assumed values (0.625 conductors from VD tables, 1.6 armour, 50m total) is 0.054 at 48.2 meters, so not much far from 0.05:
Figure_1.png


If there are dual pumps for redundancy reasons you really don't want a fault on one taking out the main supply fuses :(

Based on what I calculated some 50A switched-fuses might be better as combined isolators and final circuit protection, and then a small CU or DIN board for the distribution of power, extra circuit's RCBOs, and any SPD needed.

You would get some selectivity between, for example, the Hager '160' series 100A MCCB & 63A D-curve MCB, but then you won't have it against the DNO's fuses here (if it is 100A supply) so no better off. I would stick with some TPN switched-fuses for both supply and final pump supplies.
 
Hi
Thanks again for the thorough dive into this.

I went to site got bitten to buggery by ants (okay technical they squirt), horseflies and Mosquitos...

Worse case Ze i measured was .27ohms @843A, best case .24ohms. I have taken the worst phase here.

Up until last night, with revised cable length of 60m it was just in with 1.1mohm/m for a 70degree multicore armoured, buried - yes I know 'It' is 98A - what's a couple of amps between friends... To be honest, there is only a short part under ground. So i think i would have slept okay with this.

But...

Customer may be changing the cable direction, more buried and more length - total not yet known.

With 60m it was just in (without taking into account armoured) :-

Max Zs 100A BS88: 0.34Ohms.
Measured Ze worse case: 0.27Ohms.
Max (R1+R2) (0.34 - 0.27): 0.07Ohms.

(r1+r2) value for 35mm 70degree, muticore TP: 1.1mOhm/ m

0.07 /(1.1/1000) = 63m

So it was close at 60m measured. Of course I have not taken into account armoured, so the CE (@1.6mOhm/m) there will help a bit so.

1.6mOhm/m + 1.1mOhm/ m = 1/1.6 + 1/1.1 = 1/ 1.534090909 = 0.65ohms

So my mOhm/m resistance value including armouring and the 35mm earth = .65Ohms - this could then give me a new max length of: 0.07 /(.65/1000) = 107m. But...

As you deftly pointed out yesterday a worse case fault at any point in the cable will result in some energy going back up the cable armouring, and back down the 35mm. I now need to figure this method out, I may cheat and use a spreadsheet to calculate the fixed measurements... :)
I'll be back!

John
 
Stuffing in the PDF values for 35mm 5-core and 63m I get:
Enter line R1 in mOhm/m 0.524
Enter CPC R2 in mOhm/m 0.524
Enter armour R2 in mOhm/m 1.6
Enter length in meters 63
Maximum fault R1+R2 = 0.059 at 55.6 meters

35mm-5-core-63m.png
 

Reply to BS88 max ZS table for fuses over 63A TT or not TT in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi all. I have been asked to take over a job an electrician has started, and has moved abroad. The house is a big mansion, with a 3PH supply...
Replies
49
Views
4K
Doing a lot of EICRs at the moment and have came across what I'm sure is a common enough problem. In an off grid rural cottage I have a TT system...
Replies
20
Views
3K
I'm after advice on how best and safely to do a friends Fuseboard upgrade. Current setup is a Wylex 6 Way board with MCBs of 2x 6A, 2x 32A and 30A...
Replies
2
Views
250
Hi all, Been browsing these forums for a while, always great to learn a new way to skin the same cat. Anyway, cut a long story short, was an...
Replies
11
Views
735
Hello Need to replace a distribution board in the next few weeks to allow for more circuits to be installed in January. Existing is a TT system...
Replies
6
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock