EICR - Landlord wants to change CU and retest after EICR

[I Trippet]

I've done a few EICRs for a landlord and the latest one of his I've given an unsatisfactory, I've advised changing the CU - existing one is old and cracked, earthing needs upgrading and no RCD amongst other things. He has a "handyman" who I often work alongside with and seems a bit overly keen doing electrical work despite not being a spark or Part P. Yesterday when I spoke to him it seems the landlord for whatever reason isn't too keen on upgrading the CU even though he seems to have had it done in his other properties within last 5 years. He said he has a spare board lying around from a few years back (not seen it so no idea if it's suitable or compliant) and suggested fitting it himself then getting me back to test and issue a satisfactory report. Obviously explained that it would require an EIC and needs to be signed off which I'm not prepared to do for work that isn't mine. He's going to speak to the landlord again and get back to me but I'm tempted not to have anything more to do with this. Am I unreasonable to not even issue another EICR when the work required for improvement hasn't been registered?

 

[telectrix]

if he's asking for a EICR, just do it, but be strict, and charge top dollar.

 

[Baddegg]

Issue that eicr and get paid, pop a quote for the works that need doing in your view to get it to a satisfactory report in with it.....let him do what he wants and if he calls you back after the handyman has had a crack at it tell him all you can do is another eicr, and the outcome will be relevant to your findings..

 

[JBW175]

Landlords are tight and don’t like spending money. If they’ve got enough cash to afford several rental properties, then they can most definitely afford to pay you to do the work properly.

As above, stress that the work is notifiable and let him know you won’t be doing it unless you complete the work.

 

[SJD]

It would be quite funny if the 'new' board was plastic, and you had to give it an unsatisfactory due to not meeting regs when installed.

 

[GBDamo]

It would be quite funny if the 'new' board was plastic, and you had to give it an unsatisfactory due to not meeting regs when installed.

Or surge protection?

 

[telectrix]

a plastic CU would only merit a C3. likewise lack of SPUD.

 

[SJD]

a plastic CU would only merit a C3. likewise lack of SPUD.

Is this so?
For something known to be installed against regulations at the time, using a component (the CU) not to sufficient (fire-rated) standard?

 

[Rockingit]

Is this so?
For something known to be installed against regulations at the time, using a component (the CU) not to sufficient (fire-rated) standard?

I'd agree - something unsatisfactory at the time of installation would not meet the test. If I installed a system using bare wire on wood runners in accordance to the 1st edition, not in a million years it would never scrape a c3!!

 

[westward10]

If Mr handyman fits it I suspect a plastic consumer unit may be the least of their worries.