Search for tools and product advice,

Discuss IR reading of 3.4 mega ohms, upgrading CU help in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Reaction score
22
Ok so I have been to a domestic property today, and carried out an EICR, couple of issues flagged up with regards to the usual no RCD protection bonding cables etc now its quite a big property and the customer has gone with my advice of RCBOs but one question. Most circuits tested fine but the kitchen ring has an IR reading of 3.4 mega ohms.... my question is as this is within the limits (greater than 1) is this ok to still upgrade and issue an EIC I have had a quick look behind all the sockets to check for anything obvious but nothing now i would usually recommend this is investigated further as a side note but the kitchen isn't the easiest place to do this and with an IR reading of 3.4 it is deemed ok and therefore no classification code is required just something I wonder if anyone else has come across before

Thanks
 
Well it is a pass even if on the rather low side. Still with RCD protection it is a lot safer no matter what!

Was it tested with everything unplugged, or done by L+N to E as some things like washing machines too hard to move out to access sockets?
 
could be a simple as a bit of water spillage that hasn't quire dried out. i'd not worry aboutit. BS7671 suggests that any reading under 2 Meg. should be investigated.
 
As above! Probably a dirty or damp back-box causing it, though worst-case some fitter has nicked the cable with a screw or nail.
nicked is lucky. i.ve found a few cables with a rawlplug and screw sraight through 'em. bloody kitchen fitters.
 
nicked is lucky. i.ve found a few cables with a rawlplug and screw sraight through 'em. bloody kitchen fitters.
Ditto - and the cables have been installed in ‘safe zones’!
[automerge]1602060093[/automerge]
3.4Meg as said before worthy of a note but otherwise compliant!
 
As above! Probably a dirty or damp back-box causing it, though worst-case some fitter has nicked the cable with a screw or nail.

At my own house I found one of these when I replaced the kitchen bench top last year. The back rail on the wall had a screw in contact with the L of the RFC The cable was correctly in a zone and otherwise worked fine. But IR was about 10 meg if I recall correctly.
3ACBC895-CF9C-496C-B237-D222C7AC3E7A.jpeg
 
If both L to E and N to E are similar and in the few meg region then I would guess damp/dirt. If N to E+MET is high but L to E+MET is low I would worry about cable damage by a screw or similar.
 
At my own house I found one of these when I replaced the kitchen bench top last year. The back rail on the wall had a screw in contact with the L of the RFC The cable was correctly in a zone and otherwise worked fine. But IR was about 10 meg if I recall correctly. View attachment 61247

Looks like the cable route is even marked on the wall !
 
That is assuming the kitchen fitter could read English, I had a Polish worker on one of my sites that ripped up a piece of plywood that was shot fired to the concrete floor, it had big red lettering on it saying "Hole Under" he jemmied it up and walked forward and fell six stories down a service shaft, at the bottom was all the polystyrene that had been used to form the holes, the shaft was too small for him to turn during the fall and he just sustained a broken leg and hip, he was very lucky, but the accident report was interesting to fill out.

My most interesting accident report concluded "Too many knobs and not enough Knots"
 
That is assuming the kitchen fitter could read English, I had a Polish worker on one of my sites that ripped up a piece of plywood that was shot fired to the concrete floor, it had big red lettering on it saying "Hole Under" he jemmied it up and walked forward and fell six stories down a service shaft, at the bottom was all the polystyrene that had been used to form the holes, the shaft was too small for him to turn during the fall and he just sustained a broken leg and hip, he was very lucky, but the accident report was interesting to fill out.

My most interesting accident report concluded "Too many knobs and not enough Knots"
Seems like not reading English was not the only problem if he couldn't see a hole big enough for him to fall down?!
 
Difficult to see in front of you at ground level when holding half a sheet of plywood, we all tend to walk/step forward looking at eye level and assume the ground we are walking on is solid, the piece of plywood was too large to be tucked under an arm, so it was assumed he was holding it with both hands in front of him, if I remember correctly the shaft was 650mm square and he fell with one leg tucked behind him.
 
Difficult to see in front of you at ground level when holding half a sheet of plywood, we all tend to walk/step forward looking at eye level and assume the ground we are walking on is solid, the piece of plywood was too large to be tucked under an arm, so it was assumed he was holding it with both hands in front of him, if I remember correctly the shaft was 650mm square and he fell with one leg tucked behind him.

As someone who often works alone on site (though only houses), that gives me the shivers imagining no one finding me for hours... :eek:
 
Difficult to fall six storeys in a domestic dwelling, unless it was a block of flats and then why would anyone be in a service shaft jemmying up a sheet of plywood, the point of the original post seems to have drifted quite a lot, I know I started it, but ....................
 
Difficult to fall six storeys in a domestic dwelling, unless it was a block of flats and then why would anyone be in a service shaft jemmying up a sheet of plywood, the point of the original post seems to have drifted quite a lot, I know I started it, but ....................

Mike you're hard work. Read post 18.
 
Difficult to see in front of you at ground level when holding half a sheet of plywood, we all tend to walk/step forward looking at eye level and assume the ground we are walking on is solid, the piece of plywood was too large to be tucked under an arm, so it was assumed he was holding it with both hands in front of him, if I remember correctly the shaft was 650mm square and he fell with one leg tucked behind him.

I'd be inclined to agree, but for the fact that the guy who fell into this hole was the same guy that had just lifted the board to expose it.
 

Reply to IR reading of 3.4 mega ohms, upgrading CU help in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi! Some help would be appreciated! I've just moved into new house, wanting to check insulation resestance etc as getting some nuisance...
Replies
2
Views
374
Hi, I would love some help understanding an issue I’m having on a 16mm SWA cable running from the CU in my house to the CU in the shed. I believe...
Replies
15
Views
2K
On an EICR I found a 200 amp 3ph supply, TNS earthing (which looks original) and Ze of 19 ohms. No rods. No RCDs. L1 -> N was about 0.5 ohms...
Replies
11
Views
1K
Did a check on a ring circuit, due to board having to remain live I did it at a socket.. Was an RCBO, had checked RCD side and all tested ok...
Replies
3
Views
1K
Hello all I have recently installed a sub main in 4mm 3-core SWA, approx length 45 metres, to feed a small garden office. Final circuits in the...
Replies
7
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top