Thanks Tvev1 for pointing me to this thread.
A licensing Scheme would be a good idea, one brand/name like Gas Safe, and several Schemes, I would not trust any of the Schemes to run a single scheme dictatorship, the costs would go through the roof.
The Propaganda from the Schemes and DCLG (Government) is, that a Licensing Scheme does not work in Australia and NZ and that it is a restrictive practise, because the public cannot do anything. I think that the public should be able to do a restricted set of work as they do now.
The Schemes don't want it because they like the QS system, and the thought of a
Individual Licensing System to enable Competence on the Doorstep for the public, is a Major threat to their membership numbers and profits.
We will never get anywhere until Our Trade is speaking to Politicians that make the decisions, because one thing for sure is that Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Andrew Stunell MP, Minister for Part P, will not have been told what his own department and the Schemes are up to.
At the moment the Schemes speak on behalf of
Our Trade to DCLG, do you really think that they state the full facts.
Has everyone seen what their Schemes have stated to DCLG for the new Part P Mk2
? Yeah Right.
Its not about Competence, its about Money.