Discuss Thermo dynamics for hot water that runs off atmosphere in the Solar PV Forum | Solar Panels Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

60-70 deg on the evaporator is very very high compared to standard refrigeration systems. The negative effect this will have is on the compressor, not the refrigerant itself. I would have grave concerns about the the long term reliability of this system.
that would be stagnation temperatures though, ie when the compressor wasn't running, and that would be extreme top end. tbh I've never known PV panels to get anything like that hot in the UK, usually more like 50-55 deg top end due to the air cooling which this will also have. Thinking about it some more, I'd expect these panels would stagnate at a lower temperature than that due to it's greater surface area (fins) and conductivity to the rear of the panel for greater cooling of the rear (back of a PV panel can be around 35deg while the front is at 50 due to the poor conductivity, I'd expect this to be far more even in an aluminium panel, so the heat loss to air on the back would be that much greater).

In operation I'd be surprised if it ever went much above 25-30 deg flow temperature into the compressor even in full sun, though this depends on the flow rate and return temperature.
 
Steve
Thanks for your knowledge and honesty in these replies. This is really refreshing in trying to get to the bottom of the efficacy of this equipment. From your reply, does in your opinion this mean there is a minimum ambient temperature at which this equipment should operate? Is there a point at which there is no energy gain for the energy input to run the system? I had been told the COP effectively fell to one at around this temperature, which would mean an auxiliary back up source of water heating would then be more effective if in terms of energy cost (eg gas) if it was cheaper than electricity.
 
Last edited:
In operation I'd be surprised if it ever went much above 25-30 deg flow temperature into the compressor even in full sun, though this depends on the flow rate and return temperature.

If you ever saw this kind of temp flowing into the compressor, you need to call a fridgeman. Your expansion valve is knackered.....:D
 
From your reply, does in your opinion this mean there is a minimum ambient temperature at which this equipment should operate?

R134a boils at -26 deg C, given that you need appx 10k superheat to get a refrigeration effect, this would suggest that the systems will function at -15 degC ambient
 
Its is good to see some more technical discussion of this technology, even without firm performance data. At the other end of the scale, how is this equipment going to avoid icing and what defrost cycle is available?
Actually I reckon that where used for water heating only at least it doesn't need a defrost cycle, as it's probably simpler and more cost effective to just switch to immersion if required once the COP becomes lower than 1:1, then rely on the sun to defrost the panel - this is one advantage these systems have over ASHP where the sun will never defrost the ASHP while outdoor air temps are low, whereas I'd expect the sun would be able to defrost these panels fairly quickly even in -10 ambient air temperatures, which I've certainly seen happening with PV panels.

The running costs element is critical to its viability. Normal Solar Thermal has zero costs for energy production and pretty low running costs - a fluid change every five years and a pump if you are unlucky during it's lifetime.
not entirely true - the electricity to power the pump can easily cost £5-10 a year depending on the set up, efficiency of the pump etc. Unless it's a PV powered pump, or I guess if the customer also has solar PV installed.

There is a lot of hard work going on with DECC to make normal ST viable under the proposals for the RHI.
snigger... the same numpties who killed the solar thermal industry immediately the tory government got into power by pulling the plug on the previous grant scheme then taking 3 years to fail to implement RHI? That's not my definition of hard work to make ST viable, quite the opposite, but yes maybe they will eventually come up with something that makes it viable again.

I think the one thing the opinions expressed in this thread shows is the true market for appropriate use of this equipment IF it's performance can be validated is very very small.
I agree that it should be a niche product,but I'm not sure I'd agree on the size of the potential niche being 'very small'.

all new houses by 2016 ought to have the sort of low energy requirements that would make this sort of technology potentially viable for both heating and hot water purposes as long as the government doesn't water down it's plans any further (ok, maybe only the smaller houses / flats, with ASHP being more suited for larger houses). That's a 100,000 houses a year potential market for both water and space heating, or for water heating alone.

There's also around 500,000 homes that are all electric heated, where this would almost certainly be a cost effective alternative for the water heating side of things at least (if installed at a reasonable price), and surprisingly, that number has been risking over recent years due mainly to the number of flats / 'studio apartments' being built with such low heat demands that they're opting for all electric heating to save the expense of a wet gas heating system. I'd think that many of these stuido apartments could well be candidates for themodynamic panels to be viable cost effective alternatives for both water and space heating, where there's only 1-2 rads and low heat requirements due to only 1-2 external surfaces with reasonably high insulation values.

I'd also think this could be a particularly viable option for water heating only for those with PV installed where the running costs could be close to zero if the water is set to heat only during the day.
Use in conjunction with other technologies means it would need to to be compatible with a multi-coil thermal store or hot water storage vessel, not just a dedicated tank. If it is not compatible, you are possibly in to a two tank design, with all the space implications that entails.
that entirely misses the advantage these systems have over solar thermal in that they do not need a secondary heat source other than an immersion for the very few days of the year when the system can't operate due to extreme low temperatures. So no they don't need a second coil to be combined with another heat source.
 
ST panels get way hotter than this during stagnation, hence the avoidance of soldered joints. Temperatures can exceed 180degC.
yes, but they are insulated from the air, this panel is specifically not insulated at all, quite the opposite, it's highly conductive to air as it's entirely made of aluminium.
 
If you ever saw this kind of temp flowing into the compressor, you need to call a fridgeman. Your expansion valve is knackered.....:D
oh erm, right, sorry I've not hugely looked into the exact functioning of the heat pump side of things, tbh I don't think I've seen a proper diagram of how they're laid out, and I've not actually worked with heatpumps (at least not the internal side of them).

I'll bow to your knowledge on that side of things as you're actually installing the things from the looks of it.

Do you have any data on what the operating temperatures of flow and return from the panel actually are in operation in full sunlight? Knowing this would help greatly to understand the likely efficiency of the panel in terms of absorbing heat from sunlight vs losing a proportion of that heat to the atmosphere if the panel's operating hotter than the surrounding air. If the panel is operating at lower temperatures than the surrounding air even in full sunlight, then the panel should be in the region of 90-95% efficient at the conversion of radiant solar energy into heat depending on it's absorption factor / efficiency.

I'd generally been assuming they'd lose some of this heat to the air, but looking at your figures earlier, it looks fairly obvious that they must actually still be absorbing heat from the outside air as well, which means they must be operating below ambient air temperatures, and therefore not be losing solar energy to the air at all.

In which case my assumptions behind my guess of maximum operating temperature are obviously way off as this would be below the maximum ambient air temperature not above it.
 
Your missing the point of heat pump operation they dont use the sun the defrost, they use hot gas to defrost and the buffer tank will aid the heating system while they defrost.
 
The thermo dynamic panels only require small amounts of heat to operate, the heat comes from the compressor to warm the water, not the panel.
the compressor doesn't create heat*, it merely concentrates it from a lower grade to a higher grade of heat. The original heat energy input that allows for the high COP's comes from the panels extracting heat / energy from the air and solar radiation.



*actually I suppose it does to an extent in terms of directly transferring electrical energy to heat, but that's not where the bulk of the heat comes from.
 
Heating and cooling is accomplished by moving a refrigerant through the heat pump's indoor and outdoor coils. Like in a refrigerator, a compressor, condenser, expansion valve and evaporator are used to change states of the refrigerant between a cold liquid and a hot gas.
When the liquid refrigerant at a low temperature passes through the outdoor evaporator heat exchanger coils, ambient heat is used to cause the liquid to boil. This boiling or change of state process amasses energy as latent heat. The vapor is then drawn into a compressor which further boosts the temperature of the vapor.
Passing into the building, the vapor enters the condenser heat exchanger coils where it transfers heat to indoor air, which is drawn across the coils by a fan. As the vapor cools, it condenses back into a liquid, and releases its latent heat to the air passing over the condenser unit.
Exiting the condenser, the cold liquid refrigerant is under high pressure. The refrigerant passes through an expansion valve which reduces the pressure, draws in heat and allows the refrigerant to re-enter the evaporator to begin a new cycle
 
not if your using gas it dont
basic laws of thermodynamics say you're wrong.

the additional heat energy on top of the electrical input energy isn't just magicked into existence by the compressor, it has to originate somewhere, and in the case of a closed loop system like this that heat input obviously has to come from the panel absorbing it from the air and sun.
 
The panels wont reach 55 degrees if the outside temp at night is -5. Thats why ASHP can work down to -20,
I'm fairly obviously not saying that the compressor doesn't extract the heat energy and boost it up to the required temperature, but you seem to be denying that the heat energy actually has to originate in the panel, which is obviously wrong.
 
energie 4 block thermal graph.JPG

I've now found a datasheet for the larger swimming pool / heating systems at least.

It doesn't give proper COP figures, but does at least give min / max electrical input and heat output figures eg for the 4 panels system, as well as diagrams showing the actual heat output expected from different ambient air temperatures in day and night. I don't know what sunlight levels are assumed in the daytime heat output figures, I'm thinking probably they're based on best case scenario of 1000W/m2 insolation, but it doesn't say.

Absorbed Power 0,9 - 1,8 kW ; Thermal Power 3,6 - 7,3 kW
 
Yes but only a few degrees, stick the panel in the ground or lake it would still work, how do you think fridges work or cold stores, freezes.
it's not a matter of degrees as such, it's a matter of total energy input into the system. and yes you could put the panel in a lake if you had one, but this is an alternative for those of us who don't have sufficient lakes or ground for a GSHP / WSHP to be an option.

It has occurred to me that we might be both arguing the same position but using different terminology.
 

Reply to Thermo dynamics for hot water that runs off atmosphere in the Solar PV Forum | Solar Panels Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hello there, I’m in the process of mapping out a relatively standard S-plan system for my parents central heating and hot water system. Not sure...
Replies
10
Views
2K
HI Folks. This is my first post so apologies if it's in the wrong location. I recently installed a 3kw Solar system with an iboost diverter...
Replies
15
Views
5K
Hello everyone my name is Tarek, i work as a concert and show lighting operator with over 20 years of experience in this field, so i have gained...
Replies
1
Views
2K
Hey everyone - new to this thread so thanks for having me. I have an issue with my DC power in a small truck camper. I have 3 accessories plugged...
Replies
5
Views
1K
Apprentice electrician (coming towards the end of my 1st year) here and looking for some help and understanding. I have moved into my flat and I...
Replies
53
Views
7K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock