C3s putting you in harms way ??

[LastManOnline]

You say it’s a claim on your prof. Indemnity ins was the matter over an eicr you carried out I take it, or with cabling that you personally installed?

Not on indemnity. It was a public liability claim. I did a standard electrical installation (new wire). As it was an "open ceiling" design with no attic, cables sometimes routed under the floor and up the walls rather than over the ceiling and down the walls.
Cabling in the floor was in pipe and had a layer of damp course over it but was still compromised

 

[telectrix]

Not on indemnity. It was a public liability claim. I did a standard electrical installation (new wire). As it was an "open ceiling" design with no attic, cables sometimes routed under the floor and up the walls rather than over the ceiling and down the walls.
Cabling in the floor was in pipe and had a layer of damp course over it but was still compromised

surely your insurance will repudiate any claim against you and tell the customer to pursue the builders.

 

[i=p/u]

Yeah work it out, I have a test sheet

 

[UNG]

My inspector from Napit basically advised me of the same potential situation as the OP suggested
I was discussing with him EICR coding, whereas I am generally more lenient on my coding than some, he suggested 'why take the chance? It’s you who will end up in court trying to justify it against some hard nosed lawyer waving the code breakers book at you!’
And sadly, the way the world is heading I have to agree with him, trying to be honest and doing the right thing is just giving more leverage to a lawyer if god forbid it ever got that far
so from now on I have tightened my coding up and have been now using the code breakers book rather than the BPG no. 4 which I used to use as a reference

Good salesman that NAPIT inspector I would think a lawyer would using BS7671 as the go to reference rather than some dodgy book with dubious content

 

[LastManOnline]

surely your insurance will repudiate any claim against you and tell the customer to pursue the builders.

Correct. That is precisely what's being proposed. The approach by the insurance company appears to be "kick the bucket down the road" if the builder can, t be sued then go after the concrete supplier. But you can see where all of this is going. The customer is left in complete limbo with realistically no chance of getting compensation. In the meantime his electrical circuits circuits continue to deteriorate, regularly causing rcd to trip. Massive inconvenience and stress.The I had to act. As a result of carrying out some repairs without the loss adjuster first visiting site, I am informed that the underwriter is almost certainly not going to consider getting involved.

 

[Mike Johnson]

Not on indemnity. It was a public liability claim. I did a standard electrical installation (new wire). As it was an "open ceiling" design with no attic, cables sometimes routed under the floor and up the walls rather than over the ceiling and down the walls.
Cabling in the floor was in pipe and had a layer of damp course over it but was still compromised

Can you tell me exactly what has happened, retarders do not normally have an adverse effect on buried service's, this all sounds a bit off to me.

 

[Soi disant]

Not even AFDDs should get to £1200 for a new board unless it's ludicrously large!

So how much are single-module RCBOs with AFD?

 

[Soi disant]

Possible there's a local 7288 I guess to give him partial benefit of the doubt...

Not a conformant way to provide additional protection.

 

[Soi disant]

I would think a lawyer would using BS7671 as the go to reference

Which says what about how to code non-conformances?

 

[Mike Johnson]

So how much are single-module RCBOs with AFD?

Fusebox F2010MX 10 Way SPD Metal Consumer Unit with 10 Mini A Rated DP RCBOs | eBay

Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Fusebox F2010MX 10 Way SPD Metal Consumer Unit with 10 Mini A Rated DP RCBOs at the best online prices at eBay! Free delivery for many products.

www.ebay.co.uk