Search the forum,

Discuss Cannot get RCD test to work? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

HappyHippyDad

-
Esteemed
Arms
Reaction score
5,633
Evening chaps..

I have just fitted some downlights in a bathroom and needed to give them RCD protection as there was none. I fitted the following:

rcd unit.jpg

The test button works fine and the unit trips when a fault occurs (touching neutral to earth) but I cannot get the MFT to test it for trip times which I need for the MWC. Its a fairy decent MFT and I've never had any trouble with it testing RCD's before but I have never tested this sort of RCD before, it has always been in the CU. I make contact with the live/neutral/earth of something which the RCD is feeding, I get the little 'tick' on the MFT and then it just wont test.

Am I missing something simple here? Is this unit tested in the same way as you would an RCD in a CU?
 
In addition to Howards post above ^^^^ Have you tested the ELI prior to fitting the RCD ?, because if the earth loop is high resistance/non-existent, the tester will inhibit the test if the CPC rises above a pre-set touch voltage, usually set @ 50V, some testers allow this to be set @ 25V, so check this too.
 
In addition to Howards post above ^^^^ Have you tested the ELI prior to fitting the RCD ?, because if the earth loop is high resistance/non-existent, the tester will inhibit the test if the CPC rises above a pre-set touch voltage, usually set @ 50V, some testers allow this to be set @ 25V, so check this too.

I forgot that bit, thanks. prior to carrying out a RCD test, the earth fault loop impedance value must be confirmed as compliant. That is an answer in the 2394/5 exam as well.

Cheers............Howard
 
Evening chaps..

I have just fitted some downlights in a bathroom and needed to give them RCD protection as there was none. I fitted the following:

View attachment 23855

The test button works fine and the unit trips when a fault occurs (touching neutral to earth) but I cannot get the MFT to test it for trip times which I need for the MWC. Its a fairy decent MFT and I've never had any trouble with it testing RCD's before but I have never tested this sort of RCD before, it has always been in the CU. I make contact with the live/neutral/earth of something which the RCD is feeding, I get the little 'tick' on the MFT and then it just wont test.

Am I missing something simple here? Is this unit tested in the same way as you would an RCD in a CU?
Yes, test the same way, it is just and RCD incorporated into a Switched Fused Spur. Double check polarity and ZS on load side of unit. Also prove your meter on another RCD. You may have a faulty unit.
 
Did you test on the outgoing terminals or at the end of the circuit?

The RCD feeds a junction box which feeds the lights and also a fan in the bathroom. I tested at the triple pole switch which I fitted. I tested on the coductors coming from the junction box and the MFT gave a tick 'measurement can be performed'.
 
In addition to Howards post above ^^^^ Have you tested the ELI prior to fitting the RCD ?, because if the earth loop is high resistance/non-existent, the tester will inhibit the test if the CPC rises above a pre-set touch voltage, usually set @ 50V, some testers allow this to be set @ 25V, so check this too.

Zs was 0.9, I'll have a look at the pre-set touch voltage.. Thanks Spark68
 
Yes, test the same way, it is just and RCD incorporated into a Switched Fused Spur. Double check polarity and ZS on load side of unit. Also prove your meter on another RCD. You may have a faulty unit.

Have triple checked polarity (as I was tired!), Zs is ok and I proved the meter on another RCD in the same house.
 
If the Zs is 0.9 then I don't see the touch voltage being set @ 25V being the problem, I would check the continuity of the CPC all the way through the circuit though.

I would also try the test at the outgoing terminals of the RCD with the outgoing circuit disconnected first too, to narrow down where the problem may lie, it maybe simply that the RCD is faulty.
 
I too think the device is being tested on the input side ,as Trev says , also don't forget to isolate the outgoing circuit if pos to avoid false readings ,,LOL,,,
 
as above. try it again. might be a duff rcd.
 
however....you say it works on the test button.....but not at the load...

whip that RCD fcu off and make sure the outgoing CPC is connected....it may have come out when you pushed the front on...

or it may be that you didn`t connect it at all....as if the sleeving moved over the conductor then it could have given the impression that a secure termination had been acheaved....when in reality its not...
 
Last edited:
however....you say it works on the test button.....but not at the load...

whip that RCD fcu off and make sure the outgoing CPC is connected....it may have come out when you pushed the front on...

or it may be that you didn`t connect it at all....as if the sleeving moved over the conductor then it could have given the impression that a secure termination had been asheaved....when in reality its not...

Should have proven all that if he's done the EFLI test before RCD test ,,
 
If the Zs is 0.9 then I don't see the touch voltage being set @ 25V being the problem, I would check the continuity of the CPC all the way through the circuit though.

I would also try the test at the outgoing terminals of the RCD with the outgoing circuit disconnected first too, to narrow down where the problem may lie, it maybe simply that the RCD is faulty.

Continuity of CPC was proved.

That is a very good idea Spark68 and I should have done that.

Which implies that he has not tested at the load terminals of the device. You test the device not the circuit

Would you not test the circuit as well Trev? When you test an RCD in a CU you test that on the circuit somewhere, generally a socket?
 
I have had one of those units duff before. Would not trip at 30ma. Did 100ma Ramp test and it operated at 70ma. After that it operated at 23Ma. Still returned it as felt it could be unreliable.
 
I don't know what all the fuss is about, i once spent and age trying to find out why an RCD wouldn't trip, i was testing on the supply side, took a while for the penny to drop, and not before i had stripped the bloody thing out before i realised what i had done.

So maybe i am a waste of space after all! :dunce2:
 
I don't know what all the fuss is about, i once spent and age trying to find out why an RCD wouldn't trip, i was testing on the supply side, took a while for the penny to drop, and not before i had stripped the bloody thing out before i realised what i had done.

So maybe i am a waste of space after all! :dunce2:
I never inferred that about you. This OP seems to get a lot of grief and I felt he was about to get a load more when he just wanted some help. I guess I was wrong.
 
I don't know what all the fuss is about, i once spent and age trying to find out why an RCD wouldn't trip, i was testing on the supply side, took a while for the penny to drop, and not before i had stripped the bloody thing out before i realised what i had done.

So maybe i am a waste of space after all! :dunce2:
Howard you have over 720 Thanks from us members here, your no waste of time M8, there are numties here though, and shhh, Don't tell anyone but there may be one in this thread hehe, I said maybe lol
 
Yes, I would for a dead accurate reading of device not affected by earth leakage out on the circuit.
I'm completely at a loss to understand what you're saying here. A bit back you're backing his method when it was pointed out (calmly and respectfully) that he was carrying out the test wrongly now you appear to be backing up what I said but only to get "a dead accurate reading"
Why would you not want a dead accurate reading?
 
I'm completely at a loss to understand what you're saying here. A bit back you're backing his method when it was pointed out (calmly and respectfully) that he was carrying out the test wrongly now you appear to be backing up what I said but only to get "a dead accurate reading"
Why would you not want a dead accurate reading?
Is he not just trying to confirm if unit is faulty. Probably only a got a bathroom light and a fan on load of this unit. He done I/R and ZS and said it was good. Why disconnect load in this case? just more for him to do? That was where I was coming from.
 
Continuity of CPC was proved.

That is a very good idea Spark68 and I should have done that.



Would you not test the circuit as well Trev? When you test an RCD in a CU you test that on the circuit somewhere, generally a socket?
does this mean you carried out a Zs?

and if so have you disturbed anything sinse then....but before attempting RCD testing?
 

Reply to Cannot get RCD test to work? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi all, Been a while since I have been on here. I have been on an apprenticeship the last 3 years training in the BMS world. Taking that into...
Replies
7
Views
404
So, I was messing around yesterday with some old testers I have laying around to see if they still work I found my dads old Robin MFT and noticed...
Replies
8
Views
566
Cant get my head round this :( I understand N-E faults cause RCD's to trip, but I cant understand why on these 2 occasions, googled allover but...
Replies
13
Views
2K
I have just checked a double outlet and it trips at 18ma. It was supposed to be faulty. Washing machine had a bad heater which got replaced but...
Replies
10
Views
635
Doing a kitchen job for my daughter’s music teacher, who also happens to have been in my wife’s class at school. Nothing big… just a little...
Replies
2
Views
323

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock