Discuss EICR on a Sunday in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
Pedantic as ever Dave eh? I think you will find 2.5 is extremely common for immersion flexes, FFS how much more does it cost to install a cable that is well over capacity for the load rather than one which is only just over. If I came across a plumber who stuck a bit of 1.5 in I would ask why as well.The job I mentioned above the bloke is some kind of air-con installer and apparently they always use 2.5mm for 3kw loads!
Pedantic as ever Dave eh? I think you will find 2.5 is extremely common for immersion flexes, FFS how much more does it cost to install a cable that is well over capacity for the load rather than one which is only just over. If I came across a plumber who stuck a bit of 1.5 in I would ask why as well.
How many immersion heater heads are designed for 1.5mm? why would you install an RFC in 1.5 was it for a specific application or for general use, RFC's are usually installed in 2.5 as far as I am aware I cant really understand the point you are tying to make??Cost is irrelevant. If 2.5mm is squeezed into a terminal designed for a max of 1.5mm then there is a problem.
Do you also install all final circuits in bigger cable for the sake of putting an over capacity cable in?
I installed a ring final in 1.5mm at the weekend as that is what my calculations said would be right, would you have done it in 2.5 and wasted the extra couple of hundred pounds?
Pedantic as ever Dave eh? I think you will find 2.5 is extremely common for immersion flexes, FFS how much more does it cost to install a cable that is well over capacity for the load rather than one which is only just over. If I came across a plumber who stuck a bit of 1.5 in I would ask why as well.
So that you don't find them suffering from overheating and general degrading over time, given the arduous environments they are often in. If you are running them off an FCU then that's a bad idea anyway as the fuse is at its limit and contributing to the overheating. How much more does a bit of 2.5 cost?Why would you ask why to a bit of 1.5 butyal? I never find 2.5 it's always been 1.5 and that's all I've ever done for standard immersion heaters why use anything else
Who said anything about the temperature rating?? 1.5 is rated at 16A, which, given the conditions it is being used in, is running it close. Have you not come across such cables in a bad state after prolonged use? And what's butyal anyway, it is like butyl?2.5 butyal rated at a higher temp then 1.5? Don't think so! As Dave has already said cost is irrelavant
How many immersion heater heads are designed for 1.5mm? why would you install an RFC in 1.5 was it for a specific application or for general use, RFC's are usually installed in 2.5 as far as I am aware I cant really understand the point you are tying to make??
Who said anything about the temperature rating?? 1.5 is rated at 16A, which, given the conditions it is being used in, is running it close. Have you not come across such cables in a bad state after prolonged use? And what's butyal anyway, it is like butyl?
I don't see how you can consider that to be running it close? It is only 4/5 of the rated current of the cable
Indeed. For anyone worried about using a cable near rating, remember that the heat dissipated is proportional to the square of the current, in this case 16/25 or about 64% of the permitted temperature rise.
Please can you explain this one to me as I've not heard / been taught this calculation / consideration .... sorry if I'm being dumb!
p.s.Can we not just say heat resistant flex rather than butyl ... its so much easier to spell!!:tounge_smile:
Please can you explain this one to me
Reply to EICR on a Sunday in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.